Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions With Twinblock Versus Myobrace Appliances in Developing Skeletal Class II Patients

January 31, 2024 updated by: Alexandria University

Cephalometric Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions After Functional Treatment With Twinblock Versus Myobrace Appliances in Developing Skeletal Class II Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the pharyngeal airway changes after treatment with Myobrace and after treatment with Twinblock in developing skeletal Class II patients.

The main question it aims to answer is: Is the efficacy of the twin-block Vs Myobrace appliances in the improvement of pharyngeal airway dimensions in adolescents having skeletal Class II malocclusion with retrognathic mandible utilizing sagittal pharyngeal airway area measurements.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Ahmed Median

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy children
  • 9-12 Years
  • Skeletal Class II with mandibular defeciency and normal maxillary growth depending on clinical diagnosis and confirmed with lateral cephalometric x-reay readings ( ANB angle >4 and SNA angle <78)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous Orthodontic treatment
  • Previous extractions
  • mandibular shifts
  • Severe Crowding
  • Anterior open bite
  • Any perioral habits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Myobrace functional Appliance
Thirteen patients with developing skeletal Class II malocclusion will be treated with Myobrace functional appliance for six months.
An Appliance for treating growing Class II patients with mandibular deficiency
Active Comparator: Twin Block Functional appliance
Thirteen patients with developing skeletal Class II malocclusion will be treated with Twinblock functional appliance for six months.
An Appliance for treating growing Class II patients with mandibular deficiency

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SNA
Time Frame: Six months
Angle formed between points Sella, Nasion and A point and describes anteroposterior position of the maxilla relative to the anterior cranial base.
Six months
SNB
Time Frame: Six months
Angle formed between points Sella, Nasion and B point and describes anteroposterior position of the mandible relative to the anterior cranial base.
Six months
ANB
Time Frame: Six months
Angle formed between points A, Nasion and B point indicating the skeletal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible.
Six months
Witts appraisal
Time Frame: Six months
The linear distance between the perpendicular projections of points A and B over the functional occlusal plane.
Six months
FMA
Time Frame: Six months
Angle formed between mandibular plane and Frankfort horizontal plane.
Six months
Pharyngeal air way area measurement
Time Frame: Six months
The upper border of Naso Pharyngeal air way area will be delineated by a line extending from the harmonium (H) to the posterior nasal spine. The lower extent of the NPAA will be traced by marking a line at the tip of the soft palate parallel to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane extending to the posterior wall of the pharynx. The OPAA and LPAA are differentiated by a line drawn at the level of the tip of epiglottis parallel to the FH plane to the posterior wall of the pharynx. The lower border of the LPAA is defined as a line drawn parallel to FH plane and passing through the anteroinferior most point (C5AI) of the fifth cervical vertebra. Area will be measured.
Six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ahmed Median, PhD, Alexandria University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0418-03/2022

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1

Clinical Trials on Myobrace Functional Appliance

3
Subscribe