- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05655208
Histological Profiles of Lung Allograft Transbronchial Biopsies and Clinical Outcomes After Lung Transplantation (LANDSCAPE)
Lung transplantation is the only curative treatment for individuals with end-stage lung disease. Understanding the lung allograft's histological lesions, which is key for the patient management, remains difficult because of the multiplicity of lesions associated with graft outcome and their interpenetration.
The goal of this observational study is to identify clusters of histological lesion on transbronchial biopsies in Lung transplant recipient prospective cohort.
The main question[s] it aims to answer are:
- what are the different pattern of histological lesion?
- what are the graft outcome associated with the different clusters?
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
SCIENTIFIC JUSTIFICATION:
With more than three million deaths per year, the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is currently the third cause of mortality worldwide , and contributes to the growing number of individuals with end-stage lung disease, which is now a major issue for world public health. Overall, for individuals with end-stage lung disease, lung transplantation (LTx) is the only treatment able to increase patient survival and quality of life, with more than 4,500 lung transplantations performed each year.
Despite major progresses made in the last decade regarding organ preservation, procurement and short term outcome little improvements have been made on the histological characterization of rejection, which remains the main determinant of patient death after lung transplantation.
One of the main limitation of histological analysis is the multiplicity of lesions associated with graft outcome and their interpenetration. Historically, the perivascular infiltrate or cellular rejection (A lesions), and the lymphocytic bronchiolitis (B lesions) are the first histological lesions associated with graft dysfunction and stand as key parameters in patient management. In addition to A and B lesions, a wide spectrum of histological lesions of the lung allograft is associated with clinical outcomes.
However, to our best knowledge, only few studies thoroughly investigated the various elementary lesions in the broad scope of histological analysis, and their association with clinical outcomes. Although informative, those studies usually suffer from a small number of patients, convenience clinical samples from registry, and the lack of innovative statistical approach. Overall, the wide spectrum of the allograft lesions has not been investigated using a large number of transbronchial biopsies with standardized protocol and biopsy reading, and a multidimensional approach on deeply phenotyped data.
The recent use of unsupervised method in organ transplantation has permitted the identification of clinically relevant patient clusters and may be a relevant strategy to decipher the heterogeneity in histological lesions in lung recipients.
Therefore, using a deeply phenotyped prospective cohort of lung recipients and consecutive transbronchial biopsies with protocolized evaluation and interpretation covering the different cases scenario encountered in clinical practice, the investigators aim to identify histological clusters based on histological lesions and assess their associations with graft and patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVES:
Main objective: To identify of histological cluster of lung allograft Transbronchial biopsies
Secondary objective: To evaluate association of each cluster with baseline clinical data and anti HLA donor specific antibody and graft outcome
INTERVENTIONS:
This is an observational study that involves only minimal risk and constraints. The intervention consists in the evaluation of parameters measured as part of the standard of care at the time of post-transplant allograft biopsy.
No medicinal product is under investigation in this protocol.
EXPECTED BENEFITS for the participants and for society:
There will be no immediate individual benefit for the patient to participate in the study.
This study will provide us with data of Lung transplant patients that may allow the improvement of clinical decisions and the long-term lung allograft management.
MINIMAL RISKS AND CONSTRAINTS added by the study No additional intervention beyond the standard of care will be performed in this study.
RECRUITING CENTER:
- Single center study
- Hopital Foch, Suresnes, France
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
This prospective cohort included consecutive lung transplant recipients who were transplanted between February 2010 and November 2019 in Foch Hospital and were eligible for inclusion.
Every protocol and for cause transbronchial biopsies (TBBs) identified in the Foch hospital database for each patient were analyzed using standardized template. Reports of TBB with one or more missing values were excluded. Protocol TBB were performed after transplantation with the following scheme : month 1 (M1) at 30 ± 10 days, month 2 (M2): 60 ± 10 days, month 3 (M3): 90 ± 10 days, month 4 (M4): 120 ± 10 days, month 6 (M6): 180 ± 10 days, month 9 (M9): 270 ± 10 days and month 12 (M12): 365 ± 10 days. For cause TBB were performed in case of graft dysfunction.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- i) age greater than 18 years,
- ii) single or bilateral lung transplantation,
- iii) having at least one transbronchial biopsy available for analysis
- iv) consent their clinical data to be used for research
Exclusion Criteria:
• Biopsies with at least one missing value in the standardized clinical report were excluded
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
graft loss resulting in death or re-transplantation and all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 118 months
|
118 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
chronic lung allograft dysfunction occurrence
Time Frame: 118 months
|
118 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- LungCluster
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lung Transplant Rejection
-
Stanford UniversityKaiser Foundation Research InstituteCompletedLung Transplant Rejection | Cardiac Transplant RejectionUnited States
-
Hopital FochRecruitingLung Transplant Rejection | Lung Transplant Failure | Lung Transplant; Complications | Lung Transplant Failure and RejectionFrance
-
University of ZurichRecruitingLung Transplant Rejection | Lung Transplant Failure and RejectionSwitzerland
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingLung Transplant Rejection | Antibody-mediated RejectionAustria
-
Duke UniversityBristol-Myers SquibbWithdrawnLung Transplant Rejection | Antibody-mediated Rejection
-
Washington University School of MedicineBristol-Myers Squibb; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedLung Transplant Rejection | Antibody-mediated RejectionUnited States
-
Xemed LLCChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia; University of PennsylvaniaRecruiting
-
University of AlbertaRecruitingLung Transplant RejectionCanada, United States, Australia, Austria, Czechia, Poland
-
John F. McDyer, MDCompletedLung Transplant RejectionUnited States
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteUnknownLung Transplant RejectionSpain