Benefits of an Aerobic and Strength Rehabilitation Program With Post- SARS-CoV-2 Patients Moderate-severe (SARS-CoV-2)

December 27, 2022 updated by: David Fernández, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz

Benefits of an Aerobic and Strength Rehabilitation Program With Post-SARS-CoV-2 Patients Moderate-severe

The SARS-CoV-2 is a pulmonary pathology which is caused by SARS-COV2 and the main signs and symptoms are fever, dyspnea, cough, fatigue, muscular pain and more. Even if SARS-CoV-2 is an acute respiratory pathology we know that can cause some chronic conditions in the general status health of the patients. Besides, it can have an important impact in the physique condition such as a detrimental of the aerobic capacity, lung capacity based on the severity of the patient.

On the other hand, World Health Organization (WHO) has a criteria to classify the severity of SARS-CoV-2;

Saturation de O2 <94%,

PaO2/FiO2: <300mm

Frecuencia respiratoria > 30p/m

abscess Lung > 50%

septic shock

Multiorganic failure

Based on the high survival but the important number of side effects of this pathology remaining the detrimental of the health and exercise condition. We justify our study based on an aerobic exercise program with a strength part to improve those conditions of the patients.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators develop an aerobic exercise program for two treatment groups which one of them has a strength program as a supplement to verify if the aerobic exercise plus strength improve more than aerobic exercise alone the condition of COVID patients.

The protocol is based on 8 weeks of program with a baseline measurements and a follow ups after the 8º weeks, at 2, 4 and six months after finish the treatment to compare the effectiveness of both treatment and between them.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28015
        • David Fernández
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Astrid Texeira Taborda, Msc
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Fernández, Msc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients had been got covid in the last 2 years.
  • No fractures, or major injuries which could compromised the movements of the patient
  • No major pathologies which deteriorate the general health status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric (moderate to severe)
  • Acute infection
  • Fractures (moderate to severe)
  • Cognitive detrimental state

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Aerobic exercise plus strength
The purpose is to verify if the aerobic exercise plus a strength program improves more than aerobic exercise alone in COVID patients.
A 8 week program of aerobic exercise plus strength exercise of upper and lower limbs in the hospital with a supervised trained physiotherapist
Sham Comparator: Aerobic exercise alone
The purpose is to verify if COVID patients can improve the status of their health only with an aerobic exercise program alone.
This group has a 8 weeks program of only aerobic exercise in the hospital with a supervised trained physiotherapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6MWT
Time Frame: 6 minutes
The 6-minute walking test (6MWT) measured the cardiovascular endurance and the Functional Independence Measure assessed the global functional capacity
6 minutes
sf 36
Time Frame: 36 minutes
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a widely it. The measure meets high psychometric standards [20, 21]. The 36 items represent eight scales: Physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. These eight scales form two higher order constructs: physical health (the first four scales) and mental health (the latter four scales). These constructs are represented by two summary measures: Physical Component Summary (PCS) measure and Mental Component Summary (MCS) measure. Scoring was completed as per standard instructions, using norm-based scoring algorithms. Lower scores on the MCS refect "frequent psychological distress, substantial social and role disability due to emotional problems; health in general rated 'poor'". Lower scores on the PCS refect "Substantial limitations in self-care, physical, social, and role activities; severe bodily pain; frequent tiredness; health rated 'poor'"
36 minutes
Timed up and Go (TUG)
Time Frame: 5-7 minutes
Functional mobility was assessed through the timed up-and-go (TUG) test, five times sit-to-stand (FTSTS) test, functional reach and balance confidence. The TUG test measures the time taken by a participant to stand from a sitting position, walk 3 m, return and sit back down and is a measure of mobility. The FTSTS measures the time taken by a participant to switch from sitting-to-standing five times in a row and is a test of functional strength. Functional reach measures the distance a participant can reach forward with his or her arm outstretched while standing and is a test of balance. For each test, participants completed a practice run before the actual measurement
5-7 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
BORG
Time Frame: 10 seconds
it is a scale that has been used to evaluate the degree of dyspnea (0=no dyspnea, 10=worse dyspnea)
10 seconds
Ecography
Time Frame: 2-3 minutes
quadriceps muscle length will be measured
2-3 minutes
Heart beat
Time Frame: 45 min
the heart beat will be measured before and during the treatment sessions
45 min
Saturation
Time Frame: 45 min
Before the session and during the itself will be measured
45 min
SARC-F questionnaire
Time Frame: 10 minutes
SARC-F includes five components: strength, assistance walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and falls. SARC-F items were selected to reflect health status changes associated with the consequences of sarcopenia. SARC-F scale scores range from 0 to 10 (i.e. 0-2 points for each component; 0 = best to 10 = worst) and were dichotomized to represent symptomatic (4+) vs. healthy (0-3) status
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Fernández, msc, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COV_2022

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

When the study will be completed and published, It will be available to share with more researches.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will become available at the end of the last follow up to have all data for the Statistical analysis.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

All data Access will be possible when the manuscript will be published in a Journal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Aerobic plus strength group

3
Subscribe