Structural Mitral Valve Project

December 22, 2022 updated by: Wael Abuzeid, Queen's University

Implementation of a Structural Mitral Valve Clinic for the Management of Patients With Heart Failure Refractory to Medical Therapy

This is a prospective Quality Improvement (QI) study using the Model for Improvement framework.

The objective of this study is to implement a structured, comprehensive, innovative, and sustainable approach to the management of patients with advanced mitral valve (MV) disease and heart failure (HF) in Southeastern Ontario and to improve healthcare delivery, patient care, and patient outcomes in the context of structural surgical and percutaneous MV interventions. This will be achieved through the strategic implementation, promotion, and evaluation of:

i.The first local Southeastern Ontario Structural Mitral Valve Clinic using an Interdisciplinary heart team (IHT) at the Kingston Health Sciences Centre (KHSC) and its integration with the KHSC's existing Heart Failure Clinic; ii.The first provincial Structural Mitral Valve Clinic electronic referral service on the Ontario electronic services platform; and iii.The promotion of the above through targeted KT (Knowledge Transfer) outreach activities.

Patients for this study will be recruited through medical referral within the south eastern Ontario, Canada region.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Brigita Zile, RN, CCRP
  • Phone Number: 7109 613-549-6666
  • Email: bvz@queensu.ca

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 2V7
        • Recruiting
        • Kingston Health Sciences Centre
        • Contact:
          • Brigita Zile, RN, CCRP
          • Phone Number: 7109 613-549-6666
          • Email: bvz@queensu.ca
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with primary and secondary moderate to severe MR with heart failure (HF) (preserved or reduced ejection fraction with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class >II), who have had at least one previous hospitalization for HF, require specialist advisement.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All adults (≥18 years of age) patients with primary and secondary moderate to severe MR with HF (preserved or reduced ejection fraction with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class >II), who have had at least one previous hospitalization for HR, require specialist advisement, and have provided signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who are not eligible for either an MV surgical intervention or a TMVI procedure.
  • Females of childbearing age who are not willing or unable to use a reliable method of birth control.
  • Inpatient referrals.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wait time 1
Time Frame: At week three following study entry.
The time between date referral made and date acknowledged by cardiologist.
At week three following study entry.
Wait time 2
Time Frame: At week sixteen following study entry.
The time from acceptance for a procedure to time of pre-procedure imaging.
At week sixteen following study entry.
Wait time 3
Time Frame: At week sixteen following study entry.
The time from acceptance for a procedure to time of procedure.
At week sixteen following study entry.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morbidity 1
Time Frame: At 30 days post procedure.
Morbidity = all cause hospitalization and heart failure hospitalization post procedure.
At 30 days post procedure.
Morbidity 2
Time Frame: At one year post procedure.
Morbidity = all cause hospitalization and heart failure hospitalization post procedure.
At one year post procedure.
Mortality 1
Time Frame: At 30 days post procedure.
Mortality = all cause mortality
At 30 days post procedure.
Mortality 2
Time Frame: At one year post procedure.
Mortality = all cause mortality
At one year post procedure.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electronic referral patient experience survey
Time Frame: At day one (study entry).

A survey of patient experience and satisfaction with the electronic referral method.

Comments:

The survey will be developed by the study investigator and each patient experience related question will be answered using the following scale: Strongly agree ☐ Agree ☐ Neither agree or disagree ☐ Disagree ☐ Strongly disagree. ☐ NA

At day one (study entry).
Electronic referral usage - eReferrals answered
Time Frame: At day one (study entry).
Proportion (%) of eReferral answered
At day one (study entry).
Electronic referral usage - response time
Time Frame: At day one (study entry).
median specialist response interval time (days).
At day one (study entry).
Electronic referral usage - inappropriate eReferrals
Time Frame: At day one (study entry).
proportion (%) of inappropriate eReferrals.
At day one (study entry).
Electronic referral usage - specialist time
Time Frame: At day one (study entry).
median time (hours) spent by specialist on eReferral.
At day one (study entry).
Cost comparison 1
Time Frame: At one day post procedure.
Cost comparison between eReferral and traditional referrals based on number of baseline (pre-procedural) lab tests and investigations.
At one day post procedure.
Cost comparison 2
Time Frame: On the day prior to procedure.
Cost comparison between eReferral and traditional referrals based on number of missed clinic visits.
On the day prior to procedure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Version Date January 25, 2022

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on MitraClip procedure

3
Subscribe