Prevalence of Attributable Etiology and Modifiable Stroke Risk Factors in Patients With Covert Brain Infarctions (CBI-Registry)

January 6, 2023 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Prevalence of Attributable Etiology and Modifiable Stroke Risk Factors in Patients With Covert Brain Infarctions (CBI-registry)

The CBI registry is a prospective, interdisciplinary, multimodal observational registry of patients with covert brain infarction. Methods: A standardized workup in analogy to manifest ischemic stroke including cerebral MRI, long-term rhythm monitoring (3 x 7 days ECG), echocardiography, laboratory work-up and risk factor assessment as well as noninvasive angiography of the cervical and intracranial arteries will be performed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Covert brain infarction (CBI) are incidental lesions of presumably vascular etiology, detected on cerebral imaging and without attributable event of an acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Formerly thought to be completely "silent", CBI do have consequences: patients with CBI have a two-fold increased risk of severe stroke in the future, more often covert neurological deficits, and a steeper decline in cognitive function with increased risk of dementia. Important associations of CBI are described with hypertension, carotid stenosis, chronic kidney disease and metabolic syndrome, heart failure, coronary artery disease, hyperhomocysteinemia and obstructive sleep apnea. No trustworthy guidelines exist how to approach a patient with CBI.

Aim and hypothesis: The investigators want to provide a reliable estimate on the yield and relevance of a complete stroke workup to identify modifiable vascular risk factors in patients with CBI searching for an easily treatable cause of the event like a carotid stenosis, atrial fibrillation, hypertension or diabetes. The investigators' hypothesis is that a complete workup in patients with CBI has a similar yield of underlying pathological findings as compared to workup recommended for AIS.

Design: The SILENT registry is a prospective, interdisciplinary, multimodal observational registry of 230 patients with CBI. Methods: A standardized workup procedures including cerebral MRI, long-term rhythm monitoring (3 x 7 days ECG), echocardiography and noninvasive angiography of the cervical and intracranial arteries will be performed.

Statistics: A sample size calculation estimated a sample size of 230 patients. A prespecified analysis protocol will be used.

Significance: This study has the potential to extend the work-up of stroke to patients with CBI. Since CBI are up to three times more frequent than manifest ischemic stroke, this would have huge implications for primary stroke prevention.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

230

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Tours, France
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours
        • Contact:
          • Marco Pasi
      • Bern, Switzerland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients will be recruited by the Neuroradiology Department of Inselspital Bern. All patients undergoing a brain MRI showing a presumably silent brain lesion and fulfilling the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be eligible for the study. Inpatients will be contacted while on a ward and outpatients by telephone calls.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any clinically silent ischemic lesions of the brain parenchyma detected on neuroimaging defined according to established criteria as either:

    • DWI positive lesions: Focus of restricted diffusion (high DWI signal and low ADC value) occurring in either white or gray matter, located in the cerebrum, cerebellum, or brain stem AND not satisfying the diagnostic criteria for MS OR
    • Cavitatory Lesions: ≥ 3 mm in size that follow CSF on all sequences that are slit or wedge shaped with an irregular margin AND NOT longitudinally aligned with perforating vessels or with a multiple, bilateral symmetrical distribution OR
    • T2W hyperintense/T1W hypointense lesions: Focal lesion with high T2W signal and low T1W signal that have prior evidence of restricted diffusion; OR present within cortical gray matter or deep gray matter nuclei OR a lesion that is new, compared with an MRI performed within 3 months OR T2W hyper/T1W hypointense lesions in the white matter, which are discontinuous but associated with the classic confluent periventricular T2 intense change of leukoaraiosis (Fazekas ≥2) AND NOT satisfying the diagnostic criteria for MS or with a significant patient history of severe trauma, radiation, drug toxicity, or carbon monoxide poisoning
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature by patient or legally authorized representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Projected life expectancy of less than 2 years,
  • Contraindication to MRI,
  • Patients with a history of symptoms compatible with an AIS/TIA attributable to the lesion observed, covert neurological deficits are allowed,
  • Patient is already included in another clinical trial that will affect the objectives of this study,
  • Patient's lack of accountability, inability to appreciate the nature, meaning and consequences of the study and to formulate his/her own wishes correspondingly,
  • Women who are pregnant or breast feeding or intention to become pregnant during the course of the study,
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
  • Contraindications to any of the routine procedures, e.g. inability to obtain neurovascular ultrasound examination,
  • Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Standardized work-up
A standardized workup procedures including cerebral MRI, long-term rhythm monitoring (3 x 7 days ECG), echocardiography, stroke laboratory, risk factor assessment and noninvasive angiography of the cervical and intracranial arteries will be performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Modified Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment etiology
Time Frame: After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging

Incorporating results from the baseline work-up the most likely etiology according to the modified Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) for the chronic brain lesions observed will be rated:

  • Large vessel atherothrombotic stroke: >=50% ipsilateral vascular stenosis present
  • Cardiac embolism: Sustained or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and/or Structural or functional high-risk source of embolism
  • Small vessel (lacunar) stroke: ischemia in perforating brain artery without embolic source
  • Patent foramen ovale (PFO): PFO with or without atrial septal aneurysm with recommendation for closure (patient age <60 OR patient age 60-70 and Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Score ≥5
  • Other specific etiology (e.g. dissections)
  • Stroke of undetermined etiology (two or more causes identified, negative evaluation)
After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Modified Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment etiology
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)

Incorporating results from the baseline work-up the most likely etiology according to the modified Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) for the chronic brain lesions observed will be rated:

  • Large vessel atherothrombotic stroke: >=50% ipsilateral vascular stenosis present
  • Cardiac embolism: Sustained or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and/or Structural or functional high-risk source of embolism
  • Small vessel (lacunar) stroke: ischemia in perforating brain artery without embolic source
  • Patent foramen ovale (PFO): PFO with or without atrial septal aneurysm with recommendation for closure (patient age <60 OR patient age 60-70 and Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Score ≥5
  • Other specific etiology (e.g. dissections)
  • Stroke of undetermined etiology (two or more causes identified, negative evaluation)
At the end of follow-up (2 years)
Median of National Institute of Health Stroke score (NIHSS)
Time Frame: At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging

The NIHSS is a 15-item neurological examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patent's ability to answer questions and perform activities, without coaching and without making assumptions about what the patient can do.

Ratings for each item are scored on a 3- to 5-point scale, with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items. Scores range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Percentage of Presence of covert neurological deficits corresponding to the CBI
Time Frame: At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Unrecognized or unreported stroke-like symptoms, called covert symptoms, e.g. visual field defect or slight ataxia
At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Median of Modified Rankin Scale functional status (mRS)
Time Frame: At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assesses disability in patients who have suffered a stroke and is compared over time to check for recovery and degree of continued disability. A score of 0 is no disability, 5 is disability requiring constant care for all needs; 6 is death.
At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Median of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Time Frame: At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The MoCA may be administered by anyone who understands and follows the instructions, however, only a health professional with expertise in the cognitive field may interpret the results. Time to administer the MoCA is approximately 10 minutes. The total possible score is 30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal.
At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Median of Becks-Depression-Inventar-II
Time Frame: At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI, BDI-1A, BDI-II), created by Aaron T. Beck, is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory. Like the BDI, the BDI-II also contains about 21 questions, each answer being scored on a scale value of 0 to 3. Higher total scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. The standardized cutoffs used differ from the original:

0-13: minimal depression 14-19: mild depression 20-28: moderate depression 29-63: severe depression.

At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Median of EuroQol-5d
Time Frame: At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging

The EQ-5D consists of several components: On the one hand, the self-assessment using the EQ-5D questionnaire, which describes the state of health using five dimensions:

Agility, mobility the ability to take care of yourself Everyday activities (e.g. work, studies, housework, family, free time) pain, physical discomfort fear, depression

At baseline visit, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Number of Participants with Dyslipidemia
Time Frame: After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
according to the 2018 ACC/AHA recommendations
After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Number of Participants with New diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 2
Time Frame: After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Elevated HbA1c or random glucose according to the 2017 International Diabetes Federation Guidelines
After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Number of Participants with Hematological abnormality
Time Frame: After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
requiring change of management
After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Number of Participants with Abnormality in renal function or electrolytes
Time Frame: After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
requiring change of management
After baseline work-up, expected to be at least 3 months after brain imaging
Number of Participants with Ischemic stroke
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)
defined as new sudden focal neurological deficit of presumed cerebrovascular etiology, occurring > 24 hours after the index SBI, that persisted beyond 24 hours and was not due to another identifiable cause
At the end of follow-up (2 years)
Number of Participants with TIA
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)
defined as a transient episode of neurologic dysfunction caused by focal brain, spinal cord, or retinal ischemia without cerebral infarction on imaging
At the end of follow-up (2 years)
Number of Participants with Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)
defined as typical symptoms and cardiac biomarker elevation (troponin I or T, creatine kinase-MB) above the upper limit of normal, new pathological Q waves in at least 2 contiguous electrocardiogram leads, or confirmation at autopsy or by coronary angiography or by MRI.
At the end of follow-up (2 years)
Number of Participants with relevant symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)
including subdural, epidural, subarachnoidal and intracerebral hemorrhage, defined as hemorrhage that leads to a clinical worsening and hospitalisation and is assessed by the treating physician to be likely the cause of the new neurological symptom or the death. Intracerebral hemorrhage due to a trauma will not be considered.
At the end of follow-up (2 years)
Number of Participants with Major cardiovascular events
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)
defined as composite of stroke, myocardial infarct, heart failure or cardiovascular death)
At the end of follow-up (2 years)
Number of Participants with Systemic embolism
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)
defined as abrupt vascular insufficiency associated with clinical or radiological evidence of arterial occlusion of an extremity or organ in absence of another likely mechanism (e.g. atherosclerosis, instrumentation or trauma)
At the end of follow-up (2 years)
Number of Participants with Vascular death
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)
defined as death that is due to a vascular cause
At the end of follow-up (2 years)
Number of Participants with All-cause mortality
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up (2 years)
defined as death of any cause
At the end of follow-up (2 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Urs Fischer, Prof. Dr. med., University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Open to expand the registry to other centers. Can provide the materials:

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From 2022 onwards

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After clearance by ethics

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Silent Cerebral Infarct

3
Subscribe