GOALIE: Intramuscular vs. Enteral Penicillin Prophylaxis to Prevent Progression of Latent RHD Trial

Intramuscular vs. Enteral Penicillin Prophylaxis to Prevent Progression of Latent Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Non-inferiority Randomized Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if twice daily oral penicillin prophylaxis is non-inferior to monthly IM penicillin prophylaxis in preventing latent Rheumatic Heart Disease Progression in children between the ages of 5-17 years. The main objective is to compare the proportion of children aged 5-17 years with latent RHD receiving oral penicillin prophylaxis who progress to worse valvular disease at 2-years compared to children who receive IM penicillin prophylaxis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

GOALIS is a randomized controlled trial developed to provide high quality contemporary evidence on the efficacy of oral penicillin as RHD prophylaxis.

Aim 1: To compare the proportion of children aged 5-17 years with latent RHD receiving oral penicillin prophylaxis who progress to worse valvular disease at 2-years compared to children who receive IM penicillin prophylaxis.

Aim 2: To evaluate the economic equivalence and cost-effectiveness of oral penicillin compared to IM penicillin, after echocardiographic screening for latent RHD detection.

Aim 3: Compare patient-reported outcomes (treatment acceptance, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life) between children receiving oral and IM penicillin prophylaxis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1004

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Kampala, Uganda
        • Recruiting
        • Uganda Heart Institute
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has a new diagnosis of latent RHD detected through primary or secondary school echocardiographic screening.
  • Has agreed to participate in the study via the study's informed consent/assent process.

Operational Definition of Latent RHD Borderline RHD or Mild Definite RHD (to include no more than mild regurgitation at the mitral or aortic valve, normal mean mitral and aortic valve gradients, normal bi-ventricular function) according to the 2012 WHF consensus criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known history of ARF or RHD
  • Newly diagnosed RHD by echo screening considered to be "missed clinical RHD" as compared to true latent RHD including: > mild pathological valvular regurgitation at the mitral valve or aortic valve, mitral stenosis (mean MV gradient ≥ 4mmHg) (definite B61), aortic stenosis (mean AV gradient ≥ 20mmHg)
  • Structural or functional cardiac defects, other than those consistent with RHD, that were known prior to or detected through echo screening (except patent foramen ovale, small atrial septal defect, small ventricular septal defect, small patent ductus arteriosus)
  • Self-report of prior allergic reaction to penicillin
  • Any known conditions predisposing to thrombocytopenia or hypercoagulability, or other contraindications to intramuscular injection
  • Any known co-morbid conditions (ex. HIV, renal deficiencies, severe malnutrition) that have resulted in prescription of regular antibiotic prophylaxis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oral Pencillin
Oral phenoxymethyl penicillin (Pen V) prophylaxis 250mg twice daily.
Prophylaxis
Other Names:
  • Pen V
Active Comparator: IM Penicillin
Intramuscular benzathine benzylpenicillin G (BPG) prophylaxis (600,000 IU for children <30kg, 1.2 million IU for children ≥30kg), every 28 days
Prophylaxis
Other Names:
  • benzathine penicillin G, BPG, penicillin prophylaxis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression
Time Frame: 2 year endpoint
Progression of echocardiographic features of latent RHD to borderline to definite, or definite to mild or definite to moderate/severe
2 year endpoint

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demonstrate non-inferior costs and cost-effectiveness of oral penicillin compared to IM penicillin
Time Frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
The aim is to understand the costs and effectiveness of the intervention. Costs will include intervention and disease specific costs, capturing both health system and family out of pocket costs. Participants will complete a questionnaire asking about out-of-pocket cost (medications, supplies, consultation fees) and lost productivity (including missed school and workdays) due to the intervention. Costs will be measured in the local currency (Uganda Shillings) and presented in United States dollars (USD)
baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
Obtain cost data associated with the receipt of oral or IM penicillin in the community from a healthcare provider perspective.
Time Frame: 2 year endpoint
In order to understand health center and community costs, 10 randomly selected health care facilities (including level II, III, and IV facilities) will be surveyed to obtain direct costs of medications, supplies as well as any administration and professional fees associated with outpatient and inpatient visits.
2 year endpoint
Treatment Acceptance
Time Frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
Treatment acceptance will be assessed with the widely-used Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) questionnaire, a generic medication acceptance instrument validated for chronic conditions. This 25-item survey consists of six areas of focus: medication convenience (3 items), length of treatment (2 items), medication constraints (9 items), medication side effects (5 items), medication effectiveness (3 items), medication advantages (3 items). Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale and scores of 1 through 4 indicating increasing levels of acceptance.
baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
Treatment Satisfaction will be assessed with the 14-item Abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (v 1.4). This widely used survey contains 4 areas of focus including satisfaction of treatment effectiveness (3 items), satisfaction with treatment side effects (5 items), satisfaction with treatment convenience (3 items), and a global treatment satisfaction (3 items). Scores are then transformed to a score of 0-100 to create the overall scale score and the subcategory scores, with higher scores representing higher treatment satisfaction on that domain.
baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
Health Related Quality of Life will be measured using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core (PedsQL 4.0) questionnaire. The PedsQLTM4.0 is a 23-item survey for children aged 5-18 which assesses HRQOL. It has four areas of focus: Physical functioning (8 items), emotional functioning (5 items), social functioning (5 items), school functioning (5 items). Each item has five possible responses measuring the extent to which the item was a problem during the past month. The possible responses are measured using a 5-point Likert scale from 0=never a problem to 4 = almost always a problem. These reverse scaled scores are then transformed to a score of 0-100 to create the overall scaled score and the subcategory scores, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
Patient-reported outcomes
Time Frame: baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization
Interviews will be used to collect qualitative data around participants perceptions of the impact of RHD and its treatment on their activities of daily living and quality of life including experiences with IM or oral penicillin prophylaxis.
baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24 months post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrea Z Beaton, Cincinnati Chidren's hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatic Heart Disease

Clinical Trials on phenoxymethyl penicillin

3
Subscribe