- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05731349
Impact of Early Sepsis Care Guided by the National Early Warning Score 2 in the Emergency Department (NEWS-1-TRIPS)
Early Sepsis Care With the National Early Warning Score 2-guided Sepsis Hour-1 Bundle in the Emergency Department: A Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Stepped Wedge Randomised Controlled Trial (NEWS-1 Trial Pilot Study)
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to determine the feasibility of conducting a fully powered type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial on early sepsis care that is guided by early warning score in adult emergency department (ED) patients who have infection. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is it feasible to execute the trial procedure and fulfill the progression criteria to a full-scale trial?
- Does the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) Hour-1 Bundle care reduce the mortality of adult ED patients with a clinical diagnosis of infection and a National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) equal to or greater than 5?
- What are the barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of the SSC Hour-1 Bundle in the ED settings?
Participants will receive the following SSC Hour-1 Bundle care during the intervention period:
- Blood lactate level measurement
- Blood cultures collection before administering antibiotics
- Broad-spectrum antibiotics
- Intravenous fluid
- Vasopressors if the blood pressure remains low during or after fluid replacement to maintain the mean arterial blood pressure equal to or greater than 65 mmHg
Researchers will compare patients who receive SSC Hour-1 Bundle triggered by a NEWS2 equal to or greater than 5 and patients who receive standard treatment based on clinical judgement to see if the SSC Hour-1 that is triggered by a high NEWS2 score could reduce mortality of adult ED patients with infection.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Despite international endorsement and promulgation, the uptake of the sepsis-care bundles remains low across health-care settings. In most cases, clinicians are still offering sepsis care based on individual clinical judgement, intuition, skills, and available time and resources, leading to a variable standard of care at best and a suboptimal patient outcome in many cases. Significant knowledge gaps exist in the real-world effectiveness of sepsis bundles that are objectively triggered by the early warning score and in the best implementation strategy of sepsis bundle in the ED setting.
The sepsis care model in which the SSC Hour-1 Bundle is triggered objectively by a high NEWS2 score (≥ 5) (known as "NEWS-1 care" in this study) will be evaluated in this study. This pilot study is a type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study, which contains all the major components of a planned full-scale hybrid trial intended to involve a larger sample size from more local EDs. This pilot study has two essential components:
First, the effectiveness component will evaluate the effect of the SSC Hour-1 Bundle in reducing 30-day all-cause mortality in adult patients presenting to the ED with a clinical diagnosis of infection and a NEWS2 ≥ 5. A prospective, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial, which combines elements of a standard cluster-randomized design (intervention applied in clusters) and a before-after design (in which each cluster switches to the intervention), will be conducted in four EDs in Hong Kong. All study sites will start with an initial period of standard care; they will then switch in random order at intervals of two months to the NEWS-1 care in a unidirectional fashion until all hospitals have crossed over. Recruitment will continue in all study sites until the end of the trial.
Second, the implementation component will use a mixed-methods design to evaluate the uptake of the SSC Hour-1 Bundle using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, and determine the barriers to and facilitators of its implementation in daily practice.
The primary outcome of this pilot study is the feasibility of a full-scale type 1 hybrid trial on the NEWS-1 care, which will be determined based on the 14 pre-defined progression criteria to assess the feasibility of emergency staff in multiple centres to screen, recognise and recruit patients with suspected sepsis and to execute trial procedures; the feasibility of trial methods to decide whether a fully-powered trial should be undertaken to determine the safety and effectiveness of the intervention; and the feasibility of research staff to conduct the implementation evaluation. Please refer to the published study protocol for the 14 progression criteria.
We will not proceed to a full-scale trial if there is clear evidence of significant harm (safety criterion) or effect (equipoise criterion). As for the other progression criteria, no weighing will be added during evaluation and they will be considered collectively as we conclude the study.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Pui Kin Lam, MBBS, MPH
- Phone Number: 852 3917 9413
- Email: lampkrex@hku.hk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- Accident and Emergency Department, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital
-
Contact:
- Rex Pui Kin Lam, MBBS, MPH
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- Accident and Emergency Department, Prince of Wales Hospital
-
Contact:
- Rex Pui Kin Lam, MBBS, MPH
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- Accident and Emergency Department, Queen Mary Hospital
-
Contact:
- Rex Pui Kin Lam, MBBS, MPH
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- Accident and Emergency Department, Tuen Mun Hospital
-
Contact:
- Rex Pui Kin Lam, MBBS, MPH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
ED patients aged ≥ 18 years who fulfil ALL of the following criteria:
- a clinical diagnosis of infection made by the treating emergency physicians
- require hospital admission
- a NEWS2 ≥ 5
Exclusion Criteria:
- age < 18 years
- currently pregnant
- neutropenic or post-chemotherapy fever, for which ED protocols for early antibiotics apply
- an advanced directive with a ceiling-of-care
- refusal of consent/pre-existing mental illness rendering consent impossible
- refusal of hospitalization
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: NEWS-1 care
During the interventional period, the 2018 Sepsis Hour-1 Bundle will be initiated in the ED if NEWS2 score ≥ 5.
|
|
No Intervention: Standard care
During the standard care period, emergency physicians will assess the patients based on history, physical examination, laboratory tests, chest radiography or other imaging studies, and will offer treatment based on clinical expertise, intuition, and local or international guidelines
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
All-cause 30-day mortality (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
The number of patients who die over 30 days
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
All-cause in-hospital mortality
Time Frame: From the date of recruitment until the date of death from any cause or date of hospital discharge, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The number of patients who die during the index hospitalization
|
From the date of recruitment until the date of death from any cause or date of hospital discharge, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
All-cause 90-day mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
|
The number of patients who die over 90 days
|
90 days
|
Sepsis-related in-hospital mortality
Time Frame: From the date of recruitment until the date of death from sepsis or date of hospital discharge, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The number of patients who die during the index hospitalization because of sepsis, as judged by an independent emergency physician and an infectious disease specialist based on review of clinical notes and autopsy findings, if available
|
From the date of recruitment until the date of death from sepsis or date of hospital discharge, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
Intensive care unit admission
Time Frame: From the date of recruitment until the date of first documented intensive care unit admission or date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
Number of participants who require intensive care unit admission during the index hospitalization
|
From the date of recruitment until the date of first documented intensive care unit admission or date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
Ventilator-free days over 30 days
Time Frame: Over 30 days following recruitment
|
The number of ventilator-free days over 30 days after recruitment
|
Over 30 days following recruitment
|
The need for renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: From the date of recruitment until the date of first documented renal replacement therapy or date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The number of patients who require renal replacement therapy during the index hospitalization that is not due to pre-existing renal failure
|
From the date of recruitment until the date of first documented renal replacement therapy or date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The total length of stay in the emergency department
Time Frame: From the time of emergency department registration to the time of check out from the emergency department or time of death in the emergency department, whichever comes first, assessed up to 7 days
|
The total number of hour of patient stay in the emergency department
|
From the time of emergency department registration to the time of check out from the emergency department or time of death in the emergency department, whichever comes first, assessed up to 7 days
|
The total length of stay in the intensive care unit
Time Frame: From the date of intensive care unit admission until the date of discharge from the intensive care unit or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The total number of days of patient stay in the intensive care unit
|
From the date of intensive care unit admission until the date of discharge from the intensive care unit or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The total length of stay in the general ward
Time Frame: From the date of hospital admission to general ward until the date of hospital discharge or date of transfer out of general ward or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The total number of days of patient stay in the general ward
|
From the date of hospital admission to general ward until the date of hospital discharge or date of transfer out of general ward or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The time to surgery
Time Frame: From the of emergency department registration until the first documented time of surgery or time of hospital discharge or time of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The number of hours from ED registration to the first surgery for cases who receive surgery during the index hospitalization
|
From the of emergency department registration until the first documented time of surgery or time of hospital discharge or time of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
All-cause in-hospital mortality (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: From the date of recruitment until the date of death from any cause or date of hospital discharge, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The number of patients who die during the index hospitalization
|
From the date of recruitment until the date of death from any cause or date of hospital discharge, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
All-cause 90-day mortality (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: 90 days
|
The number of patients who die over 90 days
|
90 days
|
Sepsis-related in-hospital mortality (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: From the date of recruitment until the date of death from sepsis or date of hospital discharge, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The number of patients who die during the index hospitalization because of sepsis, as judged by an independent emergency physician and an infectious disease specialist based on review of clinical notes and autopsy findings, if available
|
From the date of recruitment until the date of death from sepsis or date of hospital discharge, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
Intensive care unit admission (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: From the date of recruitment until the date of first documented intensive care unit admission or date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
Number of participants who require intensive care unit admission during the index hospitalization
|
From the date of recruitment until the date of first documented intensive care unit admission or date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
Ventilator-free days over 30 days (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: Over 30 days following recruitment
|
The number of ventilator-free days over 30 days after recruitment
|
Over 30 days following recruitment
|
The need for renal replacement therapy (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: From the date of recruitment until the date of first documented renal replacement therapy or date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The number of patients who require renal replacement therapy during the index hospitalization that is not due to pre-existing renal failure
|
From the date of recruitment until the date of first documented renal replacement therapy or date of hospital discharge or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The total length of stay in the emergency department (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: From the time of emergency department registration to the time of check out from the emergency department or time of death in the emergency department, whichever comes first, assessed up to 7 days
|
The total number of hour of patient stay in the emergency department
|
From the time of emergency department registration to the time of check out from the emergency department or time of death in the emergency department, whichever comes first, assessed up to 7 days
|
The total length of stay in the intensive care unit (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: From the date of intensive care unit admission until the date of discharge from the intensive care unit or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The total number of days of patient stay in the intensive care unit
|
From the date of intensive care unit admission until the date of discharge from the intensive care unit or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The total length of stay in the general ward (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: From the date of hospital admission to general ward until the date of hospital discharge or date of transfer out of general ward or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The total number of days of patient stay in the general ward
|
From the date of hospital admission to general ward until the date of hospital discharge or date of transfer out of general ward or date of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The time to surgery (in full-scale stepped wedge RCT)
Time Frame: From the of emergency department registration until the first documented time of surgery or time of hospital discharge or time of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
The number of hours from ED registration to the first surgery for cases who receive surgery during the index hospitalization
|
From the of emergency department registration until the first documented time of surgery or time of hospital discharge or time of death, whichever comes first, assessed up to 90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Pui Kin Lam, MBBS, MPH, The University of Hong Kong
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Project No. 19201161
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sepsis
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasRecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis Bacterial | Sepsis BacteremiaUnited States
-
Jip GroenInBiomeRecruitingMicrobial Colonization | Neonatal Infection | Neonatal Sepsis, Early-Onset | Microbial Disease | Clinical Sepsis | Culture Negative Neonatal Sepsis | Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset | Culture Positive Neonatal SepsisNetherlands
-
The University of QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalUnknown
-
Karolinska InstitutetÖrebro University, SwedenCompletedSepsis | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, SevereSweden
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedSepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockUnited States
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
University of LeicesterUniversity Hospitals, Leicester; The Royal College of AnaesthetistsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityRecruitingSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); New York Presbyterian Hospital and other collaboratorsCompletedSepsis | Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis | Infection | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States
-
Inverness Medical InnovationsCompletedSepsis | Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome | Severe Sepsis | Sepsis SyndromeUnited States
Clinical Trials on 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Hour-1 Bundle
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompleted