Nordic Hamstring Exercise After ACL Reconstruction Reconstruction

February 20, 2023 updated by: University of Toledo

Use of Nordic Hamstring Exercise to Improve Hamstrings Function in Patients After ACL Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries constitute a significant portion of major knee joint injuries sustained by young, active individuals, and significantly increase risk for long-term disability. Yet the recommended solution to restore joint stability following injury--ACL reconstruction (ACLR)--does not prevent post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA). Post-traumatic quadriceps (dys)function is a hallmark characteristic following ACLR, reported to accelerate the onset of PTOA after ACL injury, making the recovery of muscle function a primary concern to clinicians. However, hamstrings muscle function is drastically underrepresented relative to the quadriceps in the context of recovery from ACLR, which impedes the ability to develop targeted treatment approaches. Persistent hamstrings weakness is widely reported in patients who undergo ACLR with a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft, which increases ACL strain, and may contribute to higher graft failure rates in this population. To effectively treat muscular impairments, underlying neuromuscular adaptations known to occur in response to ACLR must be targeted. Eccentric exercise is uniquely suited to enhance neuromuscular function. The Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) is a specific form of eccentric exercise that is clinically relevant and easy to implement, but has not been explored as an intervention for hamstrings neuromuscular dysfunction in patients who undergo ACLR with HT. To establish an evidence-based treatment model, the investigators will use a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial to establish the feasibility and efficacy of a 4-week NHE protocol in patients who undergo ACLR with HT. Separate factorial ANOVAs will be used to assess the effects of group (NHE, control) and time (baseline, 4 weeks) on selected outcomes. Effect sizes will be calculated for within- and between-group comparisons. The investigators expect to observe improvements in hamstrings neuromuscular function following the NHE protocol, and that those improvements will be greater than the control group. Additionally, the investigators expect the protocol to be feasible in terms of intervention adherence and patient retention. This study will identify specific barriers to the implementation of NHE in patients who undergo ACLR with HT, and will provide support for the application of an easy to implement clinical intervention able to address a complex neurophysiological problem.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43606
        • The University of Toledo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-35
  • History of primary, unilateral ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with hamstrings tendon autograft

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lower extremity orthopedic surgery prior to ACLR
  • Post-surgical complication (e.g. infection, delayed healing)
  • Multiple ligament knee injury
  • Treated articular cartilage lesion
  • Known history of knee osteoarthritis
  • Concussion within 6 months
  • History of neurological disorder
  • Currently taking prescription medication that may alter neural excitability (e.g. stimulants, depressants)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nordic Hamstring Exercise
A 4-week (10 session), progressive, Nordic Hamstring Exercise (NHE) protocol will be used for this study.
A 4-week (10 session), progressive, NHE protocol will be used for this study. Immediately following the completion of study visit 1, patients will be informed about the nature of the NHE protocol. Those available and willing to participate will be randomized to an intervention group (NHE, control). Patients randomized to NHE will receive formal instruction about how to correctly perform the exercise, and will be asked to perform several repetitions to familiarize themselves with the exercise and verify proper technique. At this time, patients will be dismissed from study visit 1, and return visits 2-11 will be scheduled to complete the NHE protocol. Patients will return for a final study visit (12) to record post-intervention measurements within 7 days of completing the NHE protocol. A minimum of 48 hours will be used to separate study visits. To accurately assess patients' ability to perform the NHE, all exercise will be performed on a NordBord Hamstring Testing System.
No Intervention: Control
Patients randomized to the control group will be instructed to avoid any changes to their normal routine (e.g., physical activity level, strength training, etc.). An investigator not involved in data collection will communicate with patients in the control group on a weekly basis to ensure they have not changed their physical activity level and do not have any questions. Patients randomized to the control group will participate in a minimum of 2 study visits at baseline and 4 weeks. These individuals will have the option to open enroll in the intervention group at the completion of their original 4-week study period. Those who choose to enroll in the intervention group at this time will return for 11 additional visits to complete the NHE protocol (visits 3-12) and final assessment (visit 13)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in peak eccentric torque
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Hamstrings
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in peak isometric torque
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Hamstrings
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in peak isokinetic torque
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Hamstrings
Baseline, 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in rate of torque development
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Hamstrings
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in torque coefficient of variation
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Hamstrings
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in central activation ratio
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Hamstrings
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in single leg hop
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Hop for distance
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in active motor threshold
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) derived outcome in semitendinosus
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in cortical silent period
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) derived outcome in semitendinosus
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in short-interval cortical inhibition
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) derived outcome in semitendinosus
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in intracortical facilitation
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) derived outcome in semitendinosus
Baseline, 4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in visual analog scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Current knee pain questionnaire (range: 0 [no pain] to 10 [high pain])
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia 11-item
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Fear of pain-related movement and reinjury questionnaire (range: 11 [low fear] to 44 [high fear])
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in ACL Return to Sport after Injury
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Psychological readiness questionnaire (range: 0 [low readiness] to 100 [high readiness])
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Subjective knee function questionnaire (range: 0 [low function] to 100 [high function])
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Subjective knee function questionnaire (range: 0 [low function] to 100 [high function])
Baseline, 4 weeks
Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Global health questionnaire (range: 0 [low global health] to 100 [high global health])
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in Tegner Activity Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Subjective activity level questionnaire (range: 0 [low activity] to 10 [high activity])
Baseline, 4 weeks
Change in International Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks
Subjective activity level (higher values = higher activity level)
Baseline, 4 weeks
Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Objectively monitored physical activity
4 weeks
Global Rating of Change
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Subjective perception of change in knee function following intervention (range: -7 [worse knee function] to 7 [better knee function])
4 weeks
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory
Time Frame: 4 weeks (intervention group only)
Interest/enjoyment and value/usefulness subscale questionnaires (range: 7 [no interest/enjoyment or value/usefulness] to 49 [high interest/enjoyment or value/usefulness])
4 weeks (intervention group only)
Average rating of perceived exertion
Time Frame: 4 weeks (intervention group only)
Subjective perception of effort/difficulty during exercise questionnaire (range: 6 [light effort] to 20 [high effort]), completed during each intervention session
4 weeks (intervention group only)
Average visual analog scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks (intervention group only)
Average pain or discomfort questionnaire (range: 0 [no pain/discomfort] to 10 [high pain/discomfort]), completed during each intervention session
4 weeks (intervention group only)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Grant Norte, PhD, ATC, The University of Toledo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 13, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Weakness

Clinical Trials on Nordic Hamstring Exercise

3
Subscribe