- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05739565
Impact of a Physical Activity Intervention With Motivational Support From Peers for Prostate Cancer Patients (ACTI-PAIR2)
Title Impact of a Physical Activity Intervention With Motivational Support From Peers for Prostate Cancer Patients - ACTI-PAIR 2 Multicenter, Randomized Stepped-wedge Study
Despite the recognized benefits of physical activity in tertiary prevention, 60-70% of prostate cancer patients are insufficiently active.
Yet 150 minutes of brisk walking per week (new WHO recommendations) is associated with a 29% reduction in cancer mortality and a 57% reduction in recurrence.
Increasing patients' adherence to regular physical activity appears to be a new challenge for personalized cancer care.
Personalized physical activity programmes (1) at home, (2) supported by health professionals, or (3) by peers have shown the effectiveness of regular physical activity.
However, these interventions last less than 6 months and do not allow for long-term sustainability of physical activity.
This study proposes to combine 3 interventions, which aim to initiate and maintain regular physical activity in prostate cancer patients:
- 1-The realization of a personalized and realistic physical activity project via physical activity support devices (sport health centers)
- 2-Coaching by a peer (a patient with the same disease who has reached the WHO recommendations for physical activity), who will provide motivational follow-up
- 3-Support by health professionals (attending physician) through the prescription of physical activity.
The feasibility of ACTI-PAIR program has been demonstrated, the investigators now wish to evaluate it effectiveness.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Amandine BAUDOT, CRA
- Phone Number: +33 (0)477829450
- Email: Amandine.Baudot@chu-st-etienne.fr
Study Contact Backup
- Name: HUPIN DAVID, MD
- Phone Number: +33 (0)477828413
- Email: David.Hupin@chu-st-etienne.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Chambéry, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Activité Physique Adaptée - CDOS Savoie
-
Principal Investigator:
- Fabrice DESCOMBES, MD
-
Chambéry, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CH Chambery
-
Principal Investigator:
- Guillaume MORICEAU, MD
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Activité Physique Adaptée - DAHLIR 63
-
Principal Investigator:
- Joris MARTIN, MD
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand - ONCOLOGIE
-
Contact:
- Aurore DOUGE
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Rémi FILLATRE
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Julien PINOT
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Sébastien BAILLY Sébastien
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CHU Clermont-Ferrand - Urologie
-
Contact:
- Laurent GUY
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Florian CERUTI, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Nicolas VEDRINE
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Clémentine MILLET
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ludivine CAMBOU
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Cyril CHARBONNEL
-
Grenoble, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Activité Physique Adaptée - CDOS Isère
-
Contact:
- MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Manon GIRARD, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Fanny BIZARD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Benjamin CASSEBRAS
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Maëva MANUEL
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Cécile GUIGUE
-
Grenoble, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CHU Grenoble - Urologie
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jean-Luc DESCOTES, MD
-
Contact:
- Jean-Luc DESCOTES, MD
-
Le Puy-en-Velay, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Activité Physique Adaptée - DAHLIR 43
-
Principal Investigator:
- Anaïs CHARRA, MD
-
Contact:
- Anaïs CHARRA, MD
-
Le Puy-en-Velay, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CH Le Puy en Velay
-
Principal Investigator:
- Corinne BRUCHET, MD
-
Contact:
- Corinne BRUCHET, MD
-
Lyon, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Activité Physique Adaptée - DAHLIR 69
-
Contact:
- Julie Julie, MD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Julie Julie, MD
-
Lyon, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CLB - Oncologie
-
Principal Investigator:
- Cécile LAUDE, MD
-
Contact:
- Cécile LAUDE, MD
-
Lyon, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CLB - Radiothérapie
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sofiane HANAYA, MD
-
Contact:
- Sofiane HANAYA, MD
-
Lyon, France
- Not yet recruiting
- HCL - CH Lyon Sud
-
Contact:
- Alain RUFFION, MD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Alain RUFFION, MD
-
Lyon, France, 69000
- Not yet recruiting
- HCL - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
-
Contact:
- Marc COLOMBEL, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Sébastien CROUZET
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Ricardo CODAS DUARTE
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Hakim FASSI-FEHRI
-
Privas, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Activité Physique Adaptée - CDOS Ardèche
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jonathan BAZARD, MD
-
Roanne, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CH Roanne
-
Principal Investigator:
- Lionel VINCENT, MD
-
Contact:
- Lionel VINCENT, MD
-
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France, 42270
- Not yet recruiting
- Clinique du Parc
-
Contact:
- Hocine HABCHI, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Amine MESSAOUD
-
Saint-Étienne, France
- Recruiting
- Hôpital privé de la Loire
-
Principal Investigator:
- Stéphane LORIN, MD
-
Contact:
- Stéphane LORIN, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Aline GUILLOT
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Cécile VASSAL
-
Saint-Étienne, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Activité Physique Adaptée - DAPAP 42
-
Principal Investigator:
- Maël GARROS, MD
-
Contact:
- Maël GARROS, MD
-
Saint-Étienne, France
- Recruiting
- CHU Saint-Etienne - Oncologie
-
Principal Investigator:
- Pierre CORNILLON, MD
-
Contact:
- Pierre CORNILLON, MD
-
Saint-Étienne, France
- Not yet recruiting
- CHU Saint-Etienne - Radiothérapie
-
Principal Investigator:
- Anne-Laure BAREILLE, MD
-
Contact:
- Anne-Laure BAREILLE, MD
-
Valence, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Activité Physique Adaptée - CDOS Drôme
-
Principal Investigator:
- Aline CARLIER, MD
-
Valence, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Hôpitaux Drôme Nord - Valence
-
Principal Investigator:
- Thomas POLGUER, MD
-
Valence, France
- Not yet recruiting
- Radiologie Drôme-Ardèche - Valence
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jean-Baptiste GUY, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Sébastien CLIPPE
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Bertrand FLEURY
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Diagnosed with prostate cancer for at least 1 year
- PA practice < 150 minutes per week (considered inactive according to WHO)
- Affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
- Having received informed information about the study and having co-signed, with the investigator, a consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
For patients:
- Undergoing treatment (except hormone therapy)
- Significant comorbidities contraindicating the practice of physical activity: associated cardiac pathologies, respiratory pathologies, disabling joint pathologies
- Deprived of liberty or under guardianship
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Acti-Pair program
|
Motivational support by the peer (a patient with the same pathology who meets the WHO recommendations for physical activity), who will provide motivational follow-up
|
No Intervention: Usual care
The control group will be made up of patients followed up for prostate cancer and benefiting from usual care which consists of giving advice and recommendations for physical activity in consultation, aiming to make patients more active in their daily lives (=usual practice, physical activity to be carried out independently, at home).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Objective measurement of physical activity (in MET-hr/week, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), measures the intensity of physical activity)
Time Frame: Month: 12
|
via actimetry (Actigraph GT9x, Pensacola, Florida, USA) 12 months (+/- 1 month) after the patient's inclusion in the Acti-Pair program
|
Month: 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Objective measurement of physical activity (in MET-hr/week, Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET), measures intensity of physical activity)
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
via actimetry (Actigraph GT9x, Pensacola, Florida, USA) (at 3 and 6 months).
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Objective measure of physical inactivity (in h/d)
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
via actimetry (Actigraph GT9x, Pensacola, Florida, USA)
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Measurement of physical capacity: walking distance (meters)
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
via the 6-minute walk test (6MWT).
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Measurement of muscle strength: biceps muscle strength (kg)
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
via the handgrip (JAMAR Hand Dynamometer, Nottingham, UK).
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Level of fatigue assessed by measuring heart rate variability (SDNN and RMSSD in ms)
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
via heart rate monitor connected to an actimeter (Actigraph GT3x, Pensacola, Florida, USA) for 24 hours
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by physicians
Time Frame: through end of inclusion, an average of 30 months
|
Number of physicians including patients
|
through end of inclusion, an average of 30 months
|
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by peers
Time Frame: through end of inclusion, an average of 30 months
|
Number of peers recruited
|
through end of inclusion, an average of 30 months
|
Adoption of Acti-Pair program by Adapted Physical Activity (APA) professionals
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 42 Months
|
Number of patients followed by APA professionals
|
through study completion, an average of 42 Months
|
Time dedicated by peers, Adapted Physical Activity (APA) professionals and health professionals to the Acti-Pair program
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 42 Months
|
Number of hours spend to follow-up patient specifically for the Acti-Pair program by peers, Adapted Physical Activity (APA) professionals and health professionals
|
through study completion, an average of 42 Months
|
Assessment of the context:factors favoring and hindering implementation, achievement, adaptation and sustainability of the programme ; compliance with the programme ; social representations
Time Frame: Before and after the implementation of the intervention
|
Semi-structured interviews
|
Before and after the implementation of the intervention
|
Percentage of adherence to the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
|
via the number of patients continuing the programme 12 months after initiation
|
12 months
|
Motivation to engage in physical activity for patients and peers
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
via the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire (BREQ-2).
This questionnaire consists of 19 items includes 6 sub-scores of motivations : introjected regulation (3 items), external regulation (4 items), intrinsic regulation (4 items), integrated regulation, amotivation (4 items) and identified regulation (4 items) on a scale from 1 (Not at all true for me) to 5 (Absolutely true for me).
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained through the intervention (quality adjusted life year)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Quality of life data will be collected (e.g.
quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, Appendix 3), transformed into utilities to calculate quality adjusted life year (QALY), and the number of patients continuing physical activity at 12 months.
Cost data will be collected throughout the study, in each of the 8 departments involved.
The analysis will be carried out from the payer's (health insurance) perspective.
The time horizon will be that of the study (12 months), and therefore in accordance with French guidelines (HAS), no discount rate will be applied
|
12 months
|
Cost per patient continuing physical activity at 12 months through the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The costs will include : - direct medical costs : health professionals consultations, peer-to-peer, patient sessions with APA professionals - indirect costs of implementing the intervention: training, facility rental operating costs, investment in small equipment
|
12 months
|
Subjective measurement of physical activity (in Metabolic equivalent of task-h/week) and sedentary time (h/d)
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Via the e-Adult Physical Activity Questionnaire (e-APAQ, EA SNA-EPIS, University of Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France) e-Adult Physical Activity Questionnaire (e-APAQ) assesses the 5 categories of physical activity (work, travel, daily life, leisure and sport) and daily life, leisure and sport).
The minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 300.
More the physical activity score is high, more the patient is active.
This questionnaire authenticates the periods of sedentarity (at work, during travel and daily life, leisure and sport).
The minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 24.
More the sedentarity score is high, more the patient is sedentary.
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Level of fatigue
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
via the FACIT-F questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue Scale).
This questionnaire asseses fatigue and it impacts.
The score range is 0 to 160.
More the score is higher, more the fatigue is high.
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
via the EuroQol-5D questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L).
The score range is -0.148 to 0.949.
Mre the score is high, more the quality of life is good.
|
Inclusion, 3, 6 and 12 months
|
Alliance between the patient and the peer
Time Frame: 12 months
|
via the Working Alliance Inventory - short version (WAI-SR). This questionnaire measures three dimensions: bonding (development of a positive interpersonal attachment between the patient and the peer including mutual trust and respect), tasks (each partner's perception of the appropriateness and effectiveness of the care tasks, as well as tasks, as well as shared responsibility for their execution) and goals (understanding, validation and acceptance by both partners of the objectives of change in physical activity management). Patients rate items on a 5-point Likert scale anchored at each end with 'rarely or never' (1) and 'always' (5). The Goal, Task and Bond domains each have scores ranging from 5 to 20. Higher scores indicate a better therapeutic alliance. |
12 months
|
Patients, peers and professionals satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Via a satisfaction questionnaire constructed for the Acti-Pair programme.
The proposed responses are a likert scale ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree.
Each item will be described with a percentage of Likert scale for each response.
More participants will fill out they have been strongly agree, more they will be satisfied.This questionnaire does not have a score.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: David HUPIN, MD PhD, CHU de Saint-Etienne
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bonn SE, Sjolander A, Lagerros YT, Wiklund F, Stattin P, Holmberg E, Gronberg H, Balter K. Physical activity and survival among men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jan;24(1):57-64. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0707. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
- Richman EL, Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Paciorek A, Carroll PR, Chan JM. Physical activity after diagnosis and risk of prostate cancer progression: data from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor. Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;71(11):3889-95. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3932. Epub 2011 May 24.
- Phillips SM, Stampfer MJ, Chan JM, Giovannucci EL, Kenfield SA. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and health-related quality of life in prostate cancer survivors in the health professionals follow-up study. J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Sep;9(3):500-11. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0426-2. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
- Steindorf K, Depenbusch J, Haussmann A, Tsiouris A, Schmidt L, Hermann S, Sieverding M, Wiskemann J, Ungar N. Change patterns and determinants of physical activity differ between breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jul;28(7):3207-3218. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05097-1. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
- Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH. Cancer survivors' exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire-survey. Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):186-94. doi: 10.1002/pon.2072. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
- Livingston PM, Craike MJ, Salmon J, Courneya KS, Gaskin CJ, Fraser SF, Mohebbi M, Broadbent S, Botti M, Kent B; ENGAGE Uro-Oncology Clinicians' Group. Effects of a clinician referral and exercise program for men who have completed active treatment for prostate cancer: A multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial (ENGAGE). Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2646-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29385. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
- Tudor-Locke C, Lauzon N, Myers AM, Bell RC, Chan CB, McCargar L, Speechley M, Rodger NW. Effectiveness of the First step Program delivered by professionals versus peers. J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jul;6(4):456-62. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.4.456.
- Buman MP, Giacobbi PR Jr, Dzierzewski JM, Morgan AA, McCrae CS, Roberts BL, Marsiske M. Peer Volunteers Improve Long-Term Maintenance of Physical Activity With Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Phys Act Health. 2011 Sep;8(s2):S257-S266. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s257.
- Pinto BM, Stein K, Dunsiger S. Peers promoting physical activity among breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2015 May;34(5):463-72. doi: 10.1037/hea0000120. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
- Galvao DA, Newton RU, Girgis A, Lepore SJ, Stiller A, Mihalopoulos C, Gardiner RA, Taaffe DR, Occhipinti S, Chambers SK. Randomized controlled trial of a peer led multimodal intervention for men with prostate cancer to increase exercise participation. Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):199-207. doi: 10.1002/pon.4495. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
- Baudot A, Barth N, Colas C, Garros M, Garcin A, Oriol M, Roche F, Chauvin F, Mottet N, Hupin D; on behalf the Acti-Pair investigators. The physical activity experience of prostate cancer patients: a multicentre peer motivation monitoring feasibility study. The Acti-Pair study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jan 21;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-00966-9.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20PH286
- 2022-A01094-39 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteRecruitingObesity | Overweight | Cancer Survivor | Prostate Adenocarcinoma | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage II Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate Cancer | Stage IVA Prostate Cancer | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer | Stage A Prostate Cancer | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; Prostate Cancer FoundationWithdrawnStage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IVA Prostate Cancer | Stage IVB Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedRecurrent Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Ryan Kohlbrenner, MDRadiological Society of North AmericaCompletedProstate Adenocarcinoma | Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Prostate Carcinoma | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage...United States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI); SanofiTerminatedDiarrhea | Recurrent Prostate Cancer | Hormone-resistant Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterProgenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.TerminatedRandomized Trial of PSMA PET Scan Before Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer (PSMA-dRT)Stage II Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Prostate...United States
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRiverside Methodist HospitalCompletedStage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Stage IV Prostate Cancer | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
University of California, IrvineCompletedRecurrent Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage I Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Prostate...United States
-
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteGenentech, Inc.CompletedRecurrent Prostate Cancer | Stage I Prostate Cancer | Stage III Prostate Cancer | Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate | Stage IIA Prostate Cancer | Stage IIB Prostate CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Acti-Pair program
-
Coopervision, Inc.Completed
-
Graeme YoungVisioncare Research Ltd.Completed
-
HTL-Strefa S.A.Completed
-
Zhe Jiang Hisun Bioray Bio-pharmaceu tical Co.LtdCompletedSimilarity of Pharmacokinetics and SafetyChina
-
Croydon Health Services NHS TrustCompletedVaricose Veins | Venous Insufficiency | Chronic Venous Insufficiency | Lipodermatosclerosis
-
London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineCompleted
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsRecruitingBRAF V600E Mutation-positive Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Solid TumorJapan
-
Sohag UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of California, San FranciscoGenentech, Inc.Active, not recruitingPediatric Recurrent/Refractory BRAFV600E-mutant GliomasUnited States, Canada
-
China National Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai HospitalRecruitingNon-Valvular Atrial FibrillationChina