Evaluation of Social Cognition in Patient With Type 1 or Type 2 Narcolepsy Versus Patients With Idiopathic Hypersomnia (COGNAR)

March 17, 2023 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Narcolepsy is a chronic disabling neurologic disorder mainly characterised by excessive daytime sleepiness. Type 1 narcolepsy is associated with a deficit of hypocretin in the cerebrospinal fluid responsible for the cataplexy symptom while type 2 shows a normal hypocretin level and no cataplexy. While the development of narcolepsy is independent of parental social level, narcolepsy has a significant influence on educational level, grading, social outcome, and welfare consequences. Several studies assessed global cognition efficiency, mood, and attention in narcoleptic patients but only a few specifically measured social cognition and mostly without a control group.

In a population of narcoleptics children, a severe impairment in social cognition is described for 20% of the group, contrary to 2 % for the control group. The literature also depicts some impairments in decision making, somatic and cognitive emotions responses but the emotion recognition seems to be preserved.

A better understanding of the social and cognitive aspects of narcolepsy could lead to a better treatment of the disease in its entirety, including if relevant specific cognitive behavioural therapy.

The protocol consists in a psychometric evaluation including several questionnaires in order to assess social cognition. It will be proposed to patients with type 1 or type 2 narcolepsy and patients with idiopathic hypersomnia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80054
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Amiens-Picardie
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Aurélie BASILLE-FANTINATO, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Véronique QUAGLINO, Pr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients (>/= 18years old)
  • diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia
  • non opposition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • comorbid psychiatric or neurologic disease
  • patient under 18 years old
  • patient under guardianship, curators or deprived of liberty, refusal of the patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NT1
type 1 narcolepsy

In addition to the usual care, the patient will complete the following validated questionnaires :

SART (Sustained Attention to Response Task), IGT (Iowa Gambling Task), UPPS (Impulsive Behaviour Scale), TAS (Toronto Alexithymia Scale), BES (Basic Empathy Scale), FRET (Facial Emotions Recognition Task), ERF-CS, MASC (Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition)

Experimental: NT2
type 2 narcolepsy

In addition to the usual care, the patient will complete the following validated questionnaires :

SART (Sustained Attention to Response Task), IGT (Iowa Gambling Task), UPPS (Impulsive Behaviour Scale), TAS (Toronto Alexithymia Scale), BES (Basic Empathy Scale), FRET (Facial Emotions Recognition Task), ERF-CS, MASC (Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition)

Active Comparator: HSI
idiopathic hypersomnia

In addition to the usual care, the patient will complete the following validated questionnaires :

SART (Sustained Attention to Response Task), IGT (Iowa Gambling Task), UPPS (Impulsive Behaviour Scale), TAS (Toronto Alexithymia Scale), BES (Basic Empathy Scale), FRET (Facial Emotions Recognition Task), ERF-CS, MASC (Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean SART score in the three groups
Time Frame: 2 years
SART is Sustained Attention to Response Task. The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) is a computer-based go/no-go task that requires participants to withhold behavioral response to a single, infrequent target (often the digit 3) presented amongst a background of frequent non-targets (0-2, 4-9). There is evidence supporting the role of the SART as a measure of working memory, sustained attention, and impulse/inhibitory control.
2 years
Mean IGT score in the three groups
Time Frame: 2 years
The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is a psychological task thought to simulate real-life decision making. Participants are presented with four virtual decks of cards on a computer screen. They are told that each deck holds cards that will either reward or penalize them, using game money. The goal of the game is to win as much money as possible. Net scores are calculated as follow: [advantageous decks (C + D) minus disadvantageous decks (A + B)] for five blocks of 20 selections.
2 years
Mean UPPS score in the three groups
Time Frame: 2 years
UPPS (Impulsive Behaviour Scale). The Impulsive behavior scale (S-UPPS-P) is an instrument composed of 20 items rated on a four-point Likert scale (23): (1) disagree strongly, (2) disagree some, (3) agree some, and (4) agree strongly. Scores are presented for each of five subscales, plus a total impulsivity score. In addition to the raw scores, in order to put each subscale into the same metric, the mean is calculated for the items on each subscale, from 1 to 4, where 1 indicates that the respondent did not indorse impulsive answers, and 4 indicating a high level of self-reported impulsivity.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 7, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Narcolepsy

Clinical Trials on Questionary

3
Subscribe