Potential Injection of Human Umbilical Cord Secretome in the Case of Trophic Ulcers (Pre-post Intervention)

March 8, 2023 updated by: Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM

Effectiveness of Giving Injection of Human Umbilical Cord Secretome in the Case of Trophic Ulcers (Pre-post Intervention)

Background: Trophic ulcer is one of the complications that arise due to leprosy infection of the skin and includes diseases that trigger permanent disability and reduce the quality of life of the person. The facts in the field that more than 50% of chronic ulcers, especially trophic ulcers due to leprosy fail to heal with usual treatment. Therefore it is important to do a new method in healing trophic ulcers. Stem cell therapy or one of them is conditioned medium mesenchymal stem cell is a promising therapy because of its biological and physiological processes resembling the mechanism of wound healing Method: This research is a clinical trial research "Open Trial". Phase 1 to see the side effects caused by the intervention. Minimum sample size of 20 respondents with trophic ulcers due to leprosy that is difficult to resolve with usual treatment. The main outcome is wound healing in terms of the length and extent of the wound. The secondary outcome is treatment toxicity 4 weeks after administration. Follow-up visits will be scheduled at 2, 4, and 12 weeks post-treatment. If the results confirm safety, feasibility and potential efficacy, large multicenter randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up will begin with a focus on the effectiveness of therapy

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Banten
      • Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia, 15810
        • Sukma Clinic
    • West Borneo
      • Singkawang, West Borneo, Indonesia, 79123
        • RS Alverno Singkawang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic ulcers in Morbus Hansen's patients aged 18-80 years
  • Not recovering with routine therapy for at least 1 months
  • Trophic ulcers degrees 2 and 3
  • Willing to take part in the study
  • As well as with the respondent's good health to follow this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who took anticoagulants,
  • Patients had hypertension
  • Patients had any staging kidney failure
  • Patients had a history of blood disorders and pregnancy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conditioned Medium Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (CM-WJMSCs)
Conditioned Medium Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (CM-WJMSCs) made as much as 0.1cc / 1cm intracutaneously with a flexpen device in the wound area every 2 weeks.
The interventions given in this study were Conditioned Medium Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (CM-WJMSCs) as much as 0.1cc / 1cm intracutaneously with a flexpen device in the wound area every 2 weeks. The variables in this study were divided into two, namely the independent variable was the use of Conditioned Medium Wharton's Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (CM-WJMSCs) were administered intracutaneously, and the dependent variables were wound healing and side effects caused by the interventions given. Wound healing or repair in this study was assessed from several variables, namely the presence of granulation tissue growth, reduced edema, reduced erythema and improvement in wound size both in terms of length, width, and area measured by using a standard ruler and digital photo.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Wound Size - Length
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Digital measurements of Length carried out using a rule from time to time (1 time per week for 4 weeks) with units in cm
4 weeks
Changes in Wound Size - Width
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Digital measurements of Width carried out using a rule from time to time (1 time per week for 4 weeks) with units in cm
4 weeks
Changes in Wound Size - Area
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Digital measurements carried out by multiplying the length and width of the wound over time (1 time per week for 4 weeks) in units of cm squares
4 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse event of Allergic
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of side effects in the form of allergies for 4 weeks the intervention is expressed in the form of incidence with consideration of diagnosis by a doctor and sought to know about the causal from these side effects
4 weeks
Adverse event of Erythema
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of side effects in the form of erythema for 4 weeks the intervention is expressed in the form of incidence with consideration of diagnosis by a doctor and searched for causal from these side effects
4 weeks
Adverse event of Angioedema and Urticaria
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of side effects in the form of Angioedema and Urticaria for 4 weeks the intervention is expressed in the form of incidence with consideration of diagnosis by a doctor and searched for causal from these side effects
4 weeks
Adverse event of Tumor
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Assessment of side effects in the form of Tumor for 4 weeks the intervention is expressed in the form of incidence with consideration of diagnosis by a doctor and searched for causal from these side effects
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Secretome

3
Subscribe