Dexmedetomidine Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnosis of Endobronchial US-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

October 24, 2023 updated by: Mohamed Fouad Algyar, Kafrelsheikh University

Moderate Sedation by Dexmedetomidine Versus General Anesthesia on the Diagnostic Yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of this study is to compare dexmedetomidine as moderate sedation versus general anathesia on the diagnostic yield of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has emerged as a highly effective, minimally invasive technique for sampling peribronchial, mediastinal, and lung masses for pathologic examination with low rate of complications, and costs.

Dexmedetomidine, is a high-affinity adrenergic agonist of the alpha 2 receptor, is a potential alternative sedative.

The use of dexmedetomidine does not lead to respiratory depression, or to a decline in cognitive skills or patient cooperation. This is because dexmedetomidine acts on the alpha-2 receptors in the locus coeruleus, in contrast to other sedatives (midazolam and propofol) which act on GABA receptors/cerebral cortex.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • ElGharbiaa
      • Tanta, ElGharbiaa, Egypt, 31511
        • Mohammad Fouad Algyar
        • Contact:
          • Mohammad F Algyar, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification II or III a requiring EBUS-TBNA based on suspicion of either benign or malignant disease in mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes (LNs) or masses or requiring EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal staging of lung cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected need for additional procedures other than EBUS-TBNA during planned bronchoscopy (e.g., need for navigational bronchoscopy, endobronchial biopsies, and therapeutic bronchoscopy)
  • body mass index > 35 kg/m2
  • allergies to any of the involved sedatives or anesthetic agents
  • comorbidities contraindicating the EBUS procedure
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: dexmedetomidine group
patients will recieve moderate sedation by dexmedetomidine as study group
Active Comparator: general anesthesia group
general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade under controlled ventilation as control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield of Endobronchial ultrasound -guided transbronchial needle aspiration
Time Frame: During procedure
The number of subjects in whom Endobronchial ultrasound -guided transbronchial needle aspiration provided a specific diagnosis will be assessed
During procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed S Torky, Lecturer of Chest Department , Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be provided under a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

One year after the end of the study

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sedation

Clinical Trials on dexmedetomidine

3
Subscribe