A Study Evaluating Physical Activity and Joint Health in Severe Haemophilia A Patients ≥12 Years Treated Once Weekly With Efanesoctocog Alfa (FREEDOM)

April 25, 2024 updated by: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum

A Phase 3b Open-label Study Evaluating Physical Activity and Joint Health in Previously Treated Patients ≥12 Years With Severe Haemophilia A Treated With Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII Fc-von Willebrand Factor-XTEN Fusion Protein (Efanesoctocog Alfa) for 24 Months

FREEDOM is a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3b study in Europe that aims to enrol approximately 90 previously treated severe haemophilia A patients aged ≥12 years, currently on prophylaxis. After a run-in period of 30-45 days, patients will receive efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis, 50 IU/kg once-weekly for 24 months (additional preventive dose not permitted). An activity tracker and an electronic patient diary will be used to collect data on physical activity, bleeds, factor dosing, pain, and injuries from screening throughout the study.

The primary objective is to describe changes in physical activities over 24 months on efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis, with a primary endpoint of change from baseline in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) at month 24.

Secondary objectives include relationship between physical activity and other variables (bleeds, joint status, pain, injuries, and quality of life); changes in joint status as assessed by HEAD-US, HJHS and MRI; occurrence of bleeds, injuries, pain. Safety and tolerability of efanesoctocog alfa will also be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Brussel, Belgium
        • Withdrawn
        • Investigational Site
      • Zagreb, Croatia
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Brno, Czechia
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Praha, Czechia
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Bordeaux, France
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Caen, France
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Marseille, France
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Strasbourg, France
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Gießen, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Homburg, Germany
        • Withdrawn
        • Investigational Site
      • Munich, Germany
        • Withdrawn
        • Investigational Site
      • Athens, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Dublin, Ireland
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Catanzaro, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Florence, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Naples, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Parma, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Rome, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Oviedo, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Lund, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Solna, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Canterbury, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Oxford, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Investigational Site
        • Contact:
          • Principal Investigator
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom
        • Withdrawn
        • Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment for haemophilia A with any marketed recombinant and/or plasma-derived FVIII for at least 150 EDs.
  • Having received prophylactic treatment with any marketed recombinant and/or plasma FVIII or emicizumab per local label for at least 12 months preceding enrolment.
  • Having 12 months documented pre-study treatment data regarding prophylactic treatment prescriptions and 6 months data on bleeding episodes prior to baseline visit.
  • Willingness and ability to complete training in the use of the study ePD and to use the ePD in their own smartphone throughout the study.
  • Willingness and ability to use the activity tracker provided by the sponsor to measure physical activity and heart rate.
  • Be able and willing to administer efanesoctocog alfa intravenously at home.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious musculoskeletal and/or neurological impairment limiting the mobility and the physical ability to a degree that makes the patient unsuitable for the study as judged by the investigator.
  • Other known coagulation disorder(s) in addition to haemophilia A.
  • History and/or current positive inhibitor test defined as ≥0.6 BU/mL.
  • Treatment with NSAIDs above the maximum dose specified in the prescribing information within 2 weeks prior to screening.
  • Systematic treatment within 12 weeks prior to screening with chemotherapy and/or other immunosuppressive drugs.
  • Treatment with an investigational product within 30 days or 5.5 half-lives prior to screening, whichever is longer.
  • Major surgery within 12 weeks prior to screening or planned major orthopaedic surgery to occur during the study.
  • At baseline visit, patients who have not been compliant in using the activity tracker.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Efanesoctocog alfa
All patients will be treated intravenously once weekly with 50 IU/kg efanesoctocog alfa
Recombinant coagulation factor VIII Fc-von Willebrand Factor-XTEN fusion protein (rFVIIIFc-VWF-XTEN)
Other Names:
  • BIVV001

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scoring
Time Frame: Baseline and month 24
The IPAQ is a validated, 7-day recall questionnaire measuring current levels of physical activity. Scoring of the IPAQ results in a continuous variable in the form of total MET-minutes per week. Higher scores means higher physical activity level.
Baseline and month 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scoring
Time Frame: Baseline and month 12
The IPAQ is a validated, 7-day recall questionnaire measuring current levels of physical activity. Scoring of the IPAQ results in a continuous variable in the form of total MET-minutes per week. Higher scores means higher physical activity level.
Baseline and month 12
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) score
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, 12, 18 and 24
The IPAQ is a validated, 7-day recall questionnaire measuring current levels of physical activity. Scoring of the IPAQ results in a continuous variable in the form of total MET-minutes per week. Higher scores means higher physical activity level.
Baseline, month 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change in mean daily minutes in physical activity
Time Frame: Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Tracker-recorded
Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Mean daily minutes of physical activity
Time Frame: Per 6-month period
Tracker-recorded
Per 6-month period
Change in type of workouts
Time Frame: Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Patient and tracker reported
Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Change in frequency of workouts
Time Frame: Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Patient and tracker reported
Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Change in duration of workouts
Time Frame: Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Patient and tracker reported
Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Change in patient reported intensity of workouts
Time Frame: Run-in month, month 12 and 24

The patient will report workouts in a patient diary and rate the intensity on a 5 level scale. The levels are:

1 = easy, 2 = moderate, 3 = slightly challenging, 4 = exhausting, 5 = very exhausting.

The changes will be calculated on a intra-patient basis

Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Change in tracker recorded intensity of workouts
Time Frame: Run-in month, month 12 and 24

The patient will be provided with an activity tracker that will automatically record workouts when the patient is wearing the tracker. The intensity levels will be based on the heart rate and will be presented on a 4 level scale. The levels are:

1 = out of range, 2 = fat burn, 3 = cardio, 4 = peak

Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Mean value of patient and tracker reported type of workouts
Time Frame: Per 6-month period

Type of workout will be transcribed into a risk level of participating in a given activity for a haemophilia patient. Risk levels are based on a rating of 1-3 where level 1 represents a low risk of causing a bleeding episode and level 3 represents a high risk.

The mean value will be calculated per 6-month period

Per 6-month period
Mean value of frequency of workouts
Time Frame: Per 6-month period
Patient and tracker reported
Per 6-month period
Mean value of duration of workouts
Time Frame: Per 6-month period
Patient and tracker reported
Per 6-month period
Mean value of patient reported intensity of workouts
Time Frame: Per 6-month period

The patient will report workouts in a patient diary and rate the intensity on a 5 level scale. The levels are:

1 = easy, 2 = moderate, 3 = slightly challenging, 4 = exhausting, 5 = very exhausting.

The mean value will be calculated per 6-month period

Per 6-month period
Mean value of tracker recorded intensity of workouts
Time Frame: Per 6-month period

The patient will be provided with an activity tracker that will automatically record workouts when the patient is wearing the tracker. The intensity levels will be based on the heart rate and will be presented on a 4 level scale. The levels are:

1 = out of range, 2 = fat burn, 3 = cardio, 4 = peak

The mean value will be calculated per 6-month period

Per 6-month period
Change in mean daily number of steps
Time Frame: Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Tracker-recorded
Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Mean daily number of steps
Time Frame: Per 6-month period
Tracker-recorded
Per 6-month period
Achieving WHO-recommended levels of MVPA
Time Frame: Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Tracker-recorded
Run-in month, month 12 and 24
Occurrence of bleeds in relation to workouts
Time Frame: Baseline to month 24
Baseline to month 24
Occurrence of pain in relation to workouts
Time Frame: Baseline to month 24
Baseline to month 24
Occurrence of injuries in relation to workouts
Time Frame: Baseline to month 24
Baseline to month 24
Occurrence of bleeding episodes impacting daily activity
Time Frame: Baseline to month 24
Baseline to month 24
Change from baseline in Haemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS) score
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24

The six index joints (elbows, knees and ankles) will be examined and scored. The minimum score per joint is 0, the maximum score is 20. In addition, Gait is scored on a scale from 0 to 4 based on the number of skills that are not within the normal limits.

The total score will be the sum of scores across all six joints plus the gait score (range from 0 to 124, with 0 being normal and 124 being the most severe disease).

Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
Change from baseline in Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 12 and 24
The HEAD-US joint score will be calculated for six joints, the right and left ankle, knee, and elbow joints. The specific joint score is made up of three item scores, disease activity (synovitis), disease damage of articular surfaces, and disease damage of subchondral bone. Specific joint score is the sum of the three item scores for each specific joint. Its values range from 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum).The total score represents the sum of item scores for abnormalities detected.
Baseline, month 12 and 24
Change from baseline in haemophilic arthropathy assessed by the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scale
Time Frame: Baseline, month 24
The IPSG scale is made up of two subscores, one for soft-tissue changes and one for osteochondral changes. MRI joint score is the sum of the soft tissue and osteochondral subscores for each joint, ranging from 0-17 where 0 is absence of damage. MRI total score is the sum of joint scores across all joints.
Baseline, month 24
Target joint development (three or more spontaneous bleeds into a single joint within a consecutive 6-month period)
Time Frame: Month 6, 12, 18, 24
The number and proportion of patients with target joint development and the total number of target joint developed will be assessed.
Month 6, 12, 18, 24
Target joint resolution ( ≤2 bleeds into the joint within a consecutive 12-month period the joint is no longer considered a target joint)
Time Frame: Month 6, 12, 18, 24
The number and proportion of patients with target joint resolution and the total number of target joint resolutions will be assessed
Month 6, 12, 18, 24
Target joint recurrence (≥3 spontaneous bleeds in a single joint within any consecutive 6-month period after target joint resolution)
Time Frame: Month 6, 12, 18, 24
The number and proportion of patients with target joint recurrence and the total number of target joint recurrence will be assessed
Month 6, 12, 18, 24
Number of bleeding episodes
Time Frame: Per 6-month period and cumulative
Per 6-month period and cumulative
Annualized bleeding rate (ABR)
Time Frame: Baseline to month 24
Baseline to month 24
Total annualized efanesoctocog alfa consumption
Time Frame: Baseline to month 24
Baseline to month 24
Number of injections and dose to treat a bleeding episode
Time Frame: Baseline to month 24
Baseline to month 24
Pain reported via electronic patient diary
Time Frame: Baseline to month 24
The patient will report pain (cause of pain, location and intensity. The intensity will reported as mild, moderately low, moderately high, severe and worst possible.
Baseline to month 24
Pain intensity reported in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Scale - Pain Intensity 3a
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
The PROMIS Pain Intensity instrument assesses pain intensity on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (had no pain) to 5 (very severe)
Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
Pain interference reported in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scale - Pain interference 6a
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
The PROMIS Pain Interference 6a is a patient-assessed instrument and is to measure pain interference on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)
Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
Quality of life assessed by EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24

EQ-5D-5L assess 5 dimensions of health outcome (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each of the dimensions in the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is divided into 5 levels:

  • Level 1: indicating no problem
  • Level 2: indicating slight problems
  • Level 3: indicating moderate problems
  • Level 4: indicating severe problems
  • Level 5: indicating unable to/extreme problems Patients will select a level for each dimension that best describes their health status for that dimension. A 5 digit code will be obtained, made up of the response for each dimension. This code will then be converted to an index score.The EQ-5D-5L VAS is an overall assessment of health on a scale from 1-100 that the patient provides at the end of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. 100 represents the best health you can imagine and 0 represents the worst health you can imagine.
Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
Assessment of treatment preference
Time Frame: 24 months
This will be assessed with the Treatment Preference Survey that consists of 2 questions on perceived impact of treatment.
24 months
The occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events
Time Frame: From screening to month 24
From screening to month 24
The occurrence of clinically significant changes
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
Assessed by physical examination, vital signs and laboratory tests
Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
Development of inhibitors (neutralizing antibodies directed against FVIII)
Time Frame: Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
Determined via the Nijmegen modified Bethesda assay
Baseline, month 6, 12, 18, 24
The occurrence of thrombotic and embolic events
Time Frame: From screening to month 24
From screening to month 24
Number of non-study medical care encounters
Time Frame: From baseline to month 24
The number and proportion of patients having non-study medical care encounter visits will be described, as well as the corresponding total number of visits.
From baseline to month 24
Duration of non-study medical care encounters
Time Frame: From baseline to month 24
The duration of non-study medical care encounter visits will be described.
From baseline to month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Silke Ehrenforth, MD, PhD, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sobi's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.sobi.com/en/policies

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemophilia A, Severe

Clinical Trials on Efanesoctocog alfa

3
Subscribe