Evaluation of Problem Management Plus in Pregnant Women With HIV in Kenya (Tatua)

December 6, 2023 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

Piloting Risk Stratification and Tailored Interventions With Pregnant and Postpartum Women With HIV in Kenya to Prevent Disengagement From Care and Viral Failure

This study includes secondary quantitative analysis, qualitative methods, and hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness pilot trial. The overall goal of this protocol is to determine whether risk stratification of PWLWH in conjunction with a tailored psychosocial support intervention can optimize health outcomes for the vulnerable women and infants. This study will be conducted in high-volume, low-resource health facilities in Kisumu County, Kenya, which is a priority area for research among WLWH and one of the highest HIV burden counties.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Among pregnant/postpartum women living with HIV (PWLWH) in low resource, high HIV prevalence settings, access to antiretroviral treatment (ART) has increased dramatically and mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV has decreased substantially, yet successful outcomes are not universal. Despite a 52% decline in new HIV infections among children under five from 2010-2019, recent UNAIDS data indicate global targets were missed by wide margins, with an estimated 160,000 new pediatric HIV infections annually. Sub-optimal retention of PWLWH is a major contributor to new pediatric infections. This study will be conducted in high-volume, low-resource health facilities in Kisumu County, Kenya, which is a priority area for research among WLWH and one of the highest HIV burden counties. As PMTCT programs in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) aim for the elimination of MTCT in the context of decreased funding, there is need for research geared towards identifying and supporting the most vulnerable PWLWH with tailored interventions that can be implemented using available resources. This study aims to build on a previous study, Mother and Infant Visit Adherence and Treatment Engagement Study (MOTIVATE, R01HD080477), to develop and implement interventions that can promote proper taking of HIV drugs among PWLWH, namely a risk calculator to identify women at high risk for treatment failure and an adapted Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention specifically geared towards women identified as high risk. Such interventions are critical in order to identify the most vulnerable PWLWH as early as possible to intervene with effective targeted interventions that will help improve maternal and child health outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Kenya Medical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Pregnant woman living with HIV attending an ANC clinic in Kisumu County, on/initiating ART
  • At least 15 years of age
  • At least 20 weeks estimated gestational age
  • At moderate or critical risk of the combined outcome of treatment disengagement or viral failure according to the risk calculator
  • Access to a cell phone (for those who share phones, have disclosed their HIV status to whomever individuals share the phone with.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Imminent plans of suicide and severe impairment due to severe mental, neurological or substance use disorders
  • Less than 15 years of age
  • Less than 20 weeks estimated gestational age or not currently pregnant
  • Not HIV-infected at time of first ANC visit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard of Care (SOC)

Standard of Care (SOC): For Arm 1 of the pilot trial, SOC will be implemented. SOC for PWLWH in Kenya is carried out according Kenyan National Guidelines and includes integration of antenatal care, HIV care, and HIV-exposed infant follow up within the maternal-child health clinic through 18-24 months postpartum. Provision of ART, HIV education, and adherence counseling is routinely provided. Psychosocial support is provided by either peer educators or lay health workers. WLWH who miss visits are followed up by phone and then traced in the community to encourage return to care.

PWLWH undergo routine VL testing six months after ART initiation or at confirmation of pregnancy if already on ART. VLs are performed every six months through breastfeeding.

Women with VL 200 copies/ml undergo enhanced adherence counseling with repeat VL in three months. While routine screening for IPV and depression are recommended per National Guidelines, they are incompletely implemented.

Experimental: In-Person Program Management Plus (PM+)
For Arm 2, the investigators will implement the adapted PM+ utilizing the complete manual of operations and adaptation lessons learned in the non-clinical trial portion of the study. The investigators will train mentor mothers to serve as PM+ Helpers. In-person sessions will likely be delivered at home. Sessions will continue after the birth if not completed during pregnancy. PM+ Helpers will debrief regularly on the progress of participants with clinically trained supervisors - both for their own psychological well-being and to ensure that participants receive adequate care.
PM+ sessions conducted via home visits from community mentor mothers
Experimental: Mobile Program Management Plus (mHealth PM+)
For Arm 3, the investigators will implement the adapted PM+ utilizing the complete manual of operations and adaptation lessons learned in the non-clinical trial portion of the study. The investigators will train mentor mothers to serve as PM+ Helpers. In the mHealth delivered version of PM+, PM+ Helpers will conduct PM+ virtually after an initial meeting to create rapport. Sessions will be delivered by either 1) a PM+ Helper- initiated phone call or 2) a participant-initiated call via a call-in help line. Airtime will be provided so that participation will be free of charge. Sessions will continue after the birth if not completed during pregnancy. PM+ Helpers will debrief regularly on the progress of participants with clinically trained supervisors - both for their own psychological well-being and to ensure that participants receive adequate care.
PM+ sessions conducted via phone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the combined retention and treatment failure outcome
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months postpartum, 6 months postpartum
The change in the combined outcome of a missed visit (>28 days) or treatment failure (elevated VL>= 200 copies/ml among PWLWH assessed through medical records between baseline, 3 months postpartum, and 6 months postpartum.
Baseline, 3 months postpartum, 6 months postpartum

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months postpartum, 6 months postpartum
Depression score is calculated and severity assessed through a survey utilizing Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9). PHQ-9 score is obtained by adding score for each question (total points). Total score of 0-4 suggests none to minimal depression severity, score of 5-9 mild depression severity, score of 10-14 moderate depression severity, a score of 15-19 moderately severe depression, and a score of 20-27 severe depression.
Baseline, 3 months postpartum, 6 months postpartum
Psychological Outcome Profiles
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months postpartum, 6 months postpartum
Psychological Profile of the study participant is assessed through a survey utilizing Psychological Outcomes Profile scale (PSYCHLOPS). The scale consists of four questions measuring three domains: Problems, Function and Wellbeing. The score is obtained by adding a score for each questions (total points). The maximum score for each question is 5. The maximum PSYCHLOPS score is 20. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Baseline, 3 months postpartum, 6 months postpartum
Fidelity - Content
Time Frame: 6 months postpartum
The fidelity content measure will be considered reached if 75% or more of observed intervention sessions have all the recommended intervention content fully covered as per the manual Key Points checklist.
6 months postpartum
Fidelity - Coverage
Time Frame: 6 months postpartum
Fidelity coverage will be reached if 80% or more of study participants will complete the expected number of sessions.
6 months postpartum
Feasibility - Recruitment
Time Frame: Enrollment
The intervention will be considered feasible if the proportion of eligible women able to be recruited into the study per clinic per month equals or exceeds 80% of those eligible for recruitment.
Enrollment
Acceptibility
Time Frame: 6 months postpartum
The intervention will be considered acceptable if 90% percent or more of intervention participants will rate the intervention completely acceptable. Acceptability will be assessed using items from the Theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions. The acceptability outcome indicator will be based on one question from the questionnaire: "How acceptable was the intervention to you? Response options range from completely unacceptable (1) to completely acceptable(5). A higher score means higher acceptability. The intervention will be considered acceptable if 90% or more of intervention participants rate the intervention as completely acceptable.
6 months postpartum

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa Abuogi, MD, MSc, University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Clinical Trials on In-Person Program Management Plus (PM+)

3
Subscribe