Plasma On Chronic Wounds for Epidermal Regeneration (POWER)

May 3, 2023 updated by: Coldplasmatech

Plasma On Chronic Wounds for Epidermal Regeneration - Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Plasma Therapy for the Treatment of Chronic, Non-healing Wounds in Comparison to Standard Wound Therapy -

Every year, 5 million people throughout Germany suffer from extensive, often chronic wounds. Cold plasma is an innovative therapeutic approach in the treatment of these persistent tissue defects. However, previous therapy options with cold plasma are very time-consuming, especially with increasing wound area, and are also strongly dependent on the skill of the practitioner.

This study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds. The patient-related benefit of such an additional treatment will also be evaluated. Both study arms will receive guideline-based wound therapy, which is the current gold standard.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The clinical trial investigates the efficacy of an additional 4-week initial plasma therapy (CAPT) in direct comparison to standard guideline-based wound therapy (SWT) alone. The reactivation of healing of chronic, non-healing wounds will be assessed. This reactivation is primarily measured by the reduction of wound area, a valid and clinically accepted parameter for wound healing. A large number of RCTs and cohort studies demonstrate a strong correlation between the reduction in wound area at 4 weeks and the therapy outcome at 12 and 20 weeks.

In addition to wound area reduction, other clinical parameters such as wound volume, wound closure, percentage of necrotic and fibrotic tissue, percentage of granulation tissue, wound exudate, and microflora are recorded. By recording these secondary endpoints, it is possible to closely track and analyse changes in wound condition induced by cold plasma.

Another focus of the clinical trial is the evaluation of patient-related outcomes such as frequency of occurrence of infections, perception of pain, occurrence of adverse events, frequency of hospitalization, and change in quality of life. These events are fully documented to evaluate the safety of the treatment and to rule out potential risks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

167

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Recruiting
        • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
        • Contact:
          • Christian Hünefeld, Dr.
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
        • Contact:
          • Matthias Augustin, Dr.
    • Baden-Württemberg
      • Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 72076
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitäts-Hautklinik Tübingen
        • Contact:
          • Anke Strölin, Dr.
    • Bayern
      • München, Bayern, Germany, 81927
        • Recruiting
        • Zentrum Rothenaicher
        • Contact:
          • Gerhard Rothenaicher
      • Regensburg, Bayern, Germany, 93047
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Zentrum Regensburg
        • Contact:
          • Stefan Mann, Dr.
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Bochum, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 44805
        • Recruiting
        • Katholisches Klinikum Bochum
        • Contact:
          • Markus Stücker, Dr.
    • Sachsen
      • Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01307
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden
        • Contact:
          • Roland Aschoff, Dr.
    • Thueringen
      • Saalfeld, Thueringen, Germany, 07318
        • Recruiting
        • Verbund Thüringen-Kliniken "Georgius Agricola"
        • Contact:
          • Isabel Zaenker, Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria are divided into patient-specific and wound-specific criteria.

Patient Criteria:

  • Patient must be at least 18 years old (legal age) and legally competent
  • The patient has at least one diagnosed chronic (existing for at least 8 weeks), non-healing wound due to a UCA or UCV on the lower leg, below the knee
  • There is a signed consent form dated by the patient's own hand

Wound Criteria:

  • In case of multiple wounds, the largest wound by area will be included in the study if it meets all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria and is suitable for use of the investigational product. The target wound is at least 2 cm away from the other wound(s)
  • The wound was diagnosed - at the time of planned inclusion - more than 8 weeks ago and classified as a chronic wound
  • The initial wound area is 5 cm²-100 cm2
  • The wound can be enclosed completely by the plasma applicator (10 cm x 10 cm)
  • The wound is not undermined
  • The wound is located on the lower leg

Exclusion Criteria:

The exclusion criteria are divided into patient-specific and wound-specific criteria.

Patient Criteria:

  • The patient is younger than 18 years and/or lacks legal capacity
  • The patient has already participated in this study
  • The patient is already participating in another interventional study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • The patient has an implanted pacemaker, defibrillator or other active implants
  • The patient has a light/sun allergy
  • The patient has a silicone allergy
  • The patient has had a thrombosis within the last 3 months
  • The patient has a systemic and/or chronic infectious disease (e.g., HIV, tuberculosis, hepatitis)
  • The patient has a tumour disease
  • An ongoing or recently completed chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • The patient is undergoing severe endogenous or drug immunosuppression
  • The patient is receiving systemic antibiotic treatment or is receiving/needing antiseptic/antibiotic wound therapy in/near the wound
  • The patient does not have the necessary revascularization (paVK)
  • The patient requires vital instrumental monitoring in the sense of "basic monitoring": near-patient respiratory gas measurement (oxygen, carbon dioxide and inhalation anaesthetic), pulse oximeter, ECG monitoring, blood pressure measurement (non-invasive), an oscillometric blood pressure measurement with automatic mode
  • Existing alcohol or drug abuse
  • The patient requires dialysis

Wound Criteria:

  • The wound is not a chronic wound as defined by study protocol
  • The wound is difficult to access or close to exposed vessels
  • The wound is critically colonized or infected
  • Acute infections in the wound area (radius 5 cm)
  • The wound is bleeding profusely. This does not include bleeding immediately after debridement
  • The wound is undermined
  • The wound is located at the knee or above

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Plasma (CAPT)
Conventional wound treatment according to S3 guideline, 3 visits weekly for 4 weeks, additive plasma treatment during each visit.
This study investigates the effectiveness of a system for reproducible application of cold plasma on larger areas and observes the effect of a 4-week additional plasma treatment on wound healing of large chronic wounds.
No Intervention: Standard wound treatment (SWT)
conventional wound treatment according to S3 guideline, 3 visits weekly for 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in area of chronic wounds
Time Frame: 3 visits weekly for 4 weeks, follow-up at at 12 and 20 weeks

The clinical trial is based on the following primary null hypothesis (H0):

There is no significant difference in terms of reduction in area of chronic wounds between standard guideline-based wound therapy with and without initial 4-week plasma treatment.

The associated alternative hypothesis (HA) is:

There is a significant difference in terms of reduction in area of chronic wounds between standard guideline-based wound therapy with and without initial 4 weeks of plasma treatment

3 visits weekly for 4 weeks, follow-up at at 12 and 20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound closures
Time Frame: during the 4-week active treatment phase, after 3 and after 6 months
Number of patients with wound closures achieved during the 4-week active treatment phase or in the period after the active treatment phase (3 or 6 months after last visit).
during the 4-week active treatment phase, after 3 and after 6 months
Change in wound pain
Time Frame: during the 6-month observation period
Change in wound pain during activity or at rest during the 6-month observation period. Pain was assessed using an NRS with values ranging from 0 to 10.
during the 6-month observation period
Change in quality of life
Time Frame: during the 6-month observation period
Change in quality of life, assessed using a wound-specific questionnaire (Wound-QoL) and a generic quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-12), at the end of the treatment phase, at wound closure, at early treatment discontinuation, and during the two FU time points, each compared with the start of treatment.
during the 6-month observation period
Amount of germs/bacteria in the wound bed
Time Frame: during the 4-week active treatment phase
For this purpose, swabs are taken before and after treatment. The swabs are then examined in the laboratory with regard to the microflora (germ type and resistance).
during the 4-week active treatment phase

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Robert Banaschik, Dr., Coldplasmatech
  • Principal Investigator: Isabel Zänker, Dr., Thüringen-Kliniken

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

May 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CPT2019_01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Ulcer of Lower Extremity

3
Subscribe