- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06120686
Biofeedback Training's Impact on Cognitive and Motor Skills in Kids With Intellectual Disabilities
Effect of Biofeedback Training on Cognitive and Motor Functions in Children With Intellectual Disabilities
The expected outcome of the study is to confirm or reject the hypothesis that traditional rehabilitation in combined with biofeedback training produces better results in improving motor and cognitive functions, relative to conventional rehabilitation.
In addition, the result of the study will be a protocol for dealing with school-aged children school-age children with impaired motor functions associated with impaired cognitive functions.
The developed material, will be a practical addition to therapeutic programs, Particularly useful in the work of psychological and pedagogical clinics, in offices of rehabilitation and sensory integration offices, or centers implementing early childhood development supporting child development.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In accordance with the study design, children with intellectual disabilities who will participate in a 3-week rehabilitation program will be eligible for the study.
The research will be a single-center study. The research will be conducted at the St. Hedwig the Queen Regional Hospital No. 2, Lwowska 60, 35-301 Rzeszów - Department of Child Neurology and Pediatrics.
Number of subjects included in the study: The planned group size is 60 people (30 people - study group, 30 people - control group). The given population was calculated on the basis of the sampling calculator " PLUS module " Statistica 13.3 software, taking into account the following parameters: fraction size, confidence level, maximum error.
For the study of the effect of biofeedback training on cognitive and motor function in children with intellectual disabilities, there is no need to recruit healthy participants to the control group.
Prior to the actual study, a pilot study will be conducted on a smaller group of test subjects. After taking into account the eligibility criteria, the subjects will be assigned, on the basis of random selection random assignment, to two groups: the study group - implementing the conventional therapy program supplemented additionally with visual and auditory biofeedback training on a dynamic balance platform, the control - implementing only the conventional therapy program.
Respondents from both groups will participate in a 3-week therapy program, under the same conditions using the same measuring instruments. All participants will be informed about the purpose and conduct of the study and, after consenting to the study, will be qualified for the study proper. The participation of the child called "Minor" in this study depends solely on the parent or legal guardian's expression of consent by signing the Informed Consent Form after reading the information presented information about the study being conducted.
The examination will be performed twice, the initial one before the start of therapy, and the control one after the 3-week rehabilitation program has been completed. The following tools will be used to evaluate the effects of rehabilitation: AMTI dynamography platform, Romberg Test, Up and Go Test - assessment of static and dynanmic balance, ZEBRIS computer system - assessment of posture, HEG Biofeedback (hemoencephalography) - assessment of concentration and attention, AVLT (AuditoryVerbal Lerning Test), Bourdon-Wiersma Test - assessment of cognitive functions, Southern California Sensory Integration Test - assessment of sensory function, Box and Block Test, dynamometer - assessment of hand function, Eurofit Special Test - assessment of physical fitness, PedsQLTM Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire - assessment of quality of life, Barthel Scale - assessment of functional ability.
The examination time for one participant will be 1.5 hours. A period of 12 months is planned for recruitment and examination of participants.
The planned study does not involve any risks and possible health hazards for the participants examination. The conducted examination will be completely painless and non-invasive with dignity and principles of intimacy for each patient. The examination will be conducted using measuring devices certified and approved for use within the framework of scientific research in the field of rehabilitation.
The expected outcome of the study is to confirm or reject the hypothesis that traditional rehabilitation combined with biofeedback training produces better results in improving motor and cognitive functions, compared to conventional rehabilitation.
Description of benefits to study participants:
Improved motor and cognitive functions of children with intellectual disabilities, protocol rehabilitation management for children with intellectual disabilities.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Aleksandra Ewa Kiper, MSc
- Phone Number: +48607974712
- Email: akiper94@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rzeszów, Poland, 35-959
- Recruiting
- University of Rzeszów
-
Contact:
- Aleksandra Ewa Kiper, MSc
- Phone Number: +48607974712
- Email: akiper94@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosed mild intellectual disability,
- age 7-12 years,
- current health status allowing the child to participate in the study and participate in the rehabilitation program,
- informed voluntary consent of parents and/or legal guardians to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- diagnosed intellectual disability of severe and profound degree,
- cognitive deficits impairing the ability to understand and follow instructions,
- age below 7 or above 12 years,
- coexistence of autism, Down syndrome, cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy and neurological disorders, such as epilepsy or brain damage,
- the presence of comorbidities such as rheumatic, orthopedic, oncological or cardiac diseases that may affect the subject's motor impairment.
- the lack of informed voluntary consent from parents and/or legal guardians to participate in the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: biofeedback-based therapy (BBT)
study group - implementing the conventional therapy program supplemented additionally by training with visual and auditory biofeedback on a dynamic balance platform
|
Study group - implementing a conventional therapy program supplemented additionally with visual and auditory biofeedback training on a dynamic balance platform
Other Names:
Control group - rehabilitation management aimed at improving cognitive and motor functions in children with mild intellectual disabilities.
|
Other: conventional therapy program (CT)
control group - implementing only the conventional therapy program
|
Control group - rehabilitation management aimed at improving cognitive and motor functions in children with mild intellectual disabilities.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Assessment of static and dynamic balance using the AMTI platform
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program.
|
AMTI platform use is to assess balance ability.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program.
|
Posture assessment using the computer-based ZEBRIS system
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program.
|
Zebris device allows non-invasive assessment of the shape of the curvature of the spine and parameters that determine postural disorders.
The ZEBRIS system consists of a measuring unit, a system of micro-sensors and an ultrasonic pointer, with which topographic points are scanned from the skeleton and then processed in a computer program in the form of a report containing numerical data specifying lengths, angles and degrees for each parameter, as well as graphs and figures of the spinal line.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program.
|
Assessment of concentration and attention with HEG Biofeedback (hemoencephalography)
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program.
|
Hemoencephalography (HEG) is a method of monitoring changes in frontal cerebral blood circulation and oxygenation. HEG biofeedback is a method based on the use of near-infrared technology to measure cerebral hemodynamics. A sensor armband is placed on the head in the area where reduced blood oxygenation is noted, and then emits into the brain, two beams of light at different frequencies. This allows us to check the oxygen saturation in a particular area of the brain in real time. The signal is returned to the computer screen, and the trainer tries to increase it. HEG biofeedback training involves stimulating neurons in the frontal lobes of the brain. |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Assessment of functional by Barthel Scale
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program.
|
Based on the scores assigned the patient's condition is described in the following way: I. 86-100 points - "slight" dependency; II. 21- 85 points - "moderately severe" dependency; III. 0 - 20 points - "severe" dependency. ability |
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program.
|
Quality of life assessment using the PedsQLTM Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
The PedsQL is based on a modular approach to measuring health-related quality of life and consists of a 15-item core measure of global health-related quality of life .
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of cognitive function using the AVLT test
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Involves five sequential presentations of a 15-word list.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Assessment of cognitive function using the Bourdon-Wiersma test
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
The Bourdon test is an approach to measuring focus and attention that requires the test taker to detect and cross out specific characters in a set of letters.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks.
The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Romberg test
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
The Romberg test is used to assess static balance.
The test involves standing with your feet together and your arms at your side or crossed in front of you.
Part of the test is with your eyes open, and the second part is with your eyes closed.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
TUG test
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
In the TUG test subjects are asked to rise from a standard armchair, walk to a marker 3 m away, turn, walk back, and sit down again.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Southern California Sensory Integration Test - Bilateral Motor Coordination
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
This test gives information about the motor activity of both sides of the body, sense of rhythm and sequence.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Southern California Sensory Integration Test - Crossing the Body's Midline
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
This test gives information about the rate and quality of cooperation between the brain hemispheres.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Southern California Sensory Integration Test - Graphesthesia
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
This test gives information about the ability to visualize tactile stimuli from the top of the hand area and visuomotor coordination.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Southern California Sensory Integration Test - Differentiating Right from Left
Time Frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
This test gives information about distinguishing the sides of the body.
|
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program; second examination - at the end of the three-week program
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023/07/48
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intellectual Disability, Mild
-
University of California, San FranciscoDoBrain Inc.RecruitingMild Intellectual Disability | Borderline Intellectual FunctioningUnited States
-
KoraalUniversity of Amsterdam; Zuyd University of Applied SciencesActive, not recruitingMild Intellectual Disability | Borderline Intellectual FunctioningNetherlands
-
Chinese University of Hong KongActive, not recruitingIntellectual Disability, MildHong Kong
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterCompletedIntellectual Disability, Mild to ModerateUnited States
-
Beni-Suef UniversityCompletedEducational Problems | Intellectual Disability, MildEgypt
-
Behavioural Science InstitutePlurynRecruitingAlcohol Use | Drug Use | Adolescent Behavior | Personality | Mild Intellectual Disability, IQ 50-70 | Borderline Intellectual Disabilities (Intelligence Quotient 70-85)Netherlands
-
Bar-Ilan University, IsraelActive, not recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Intellectual Disability, MildIsrael
-
Birgit Seelen-de LangGgz Oost BrabantRecruitingSubstance Use | Severe Mental Disorder | Intellectual Disability, MildNetherlands
-
Vestvagoy MunicipalityUniversity of Oslo; University of TromsoActive, not recruitingDisability, Developmental | Disabilities, IntellectualNorway
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Physical Disability | Specific Learning Disorder | Intellectual Disability, Mild to Moderate
Clinical Trials on Biofeedback method
-
Bogumiła PniakCompletedStroke | Rehabilitation | BiofeedbackPoland
-
University of RzeszowCompletedRehabilitation | Neurological Diseases | BiofeedbackPoland
-
Technische Universität DresdenMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research; University Hospital Carl...CompletedAutonomic Dysfunction | Acute Ischaemic StrokeGermany
-
Klick Inc.Completed
-
L. Eugene ArnoldNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Brain Resource CenterCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingMajor Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
Badr UniversityCompletedFecal Incontinence in ChildrenEgypt
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKwong Wah HospitalCompleted
-
New York UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD); Syracuse... and other collaboratorsCompletedSpeech Sound DisorderUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyArthritis FoundationCompleted