- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05865652
Evaluation of Membrane Phospholipid and Energy Metabolism in Subjects at High Risk of Psychotic Transition (MR7T-UHR)
Evaluation of Membrane Phospholipid Metabolism and Cellular Energy Metabolism in Subjects at High Risk of Psychotic Transition
The management of schizophrenia is a major public health issue, due to its particularly disabling psychotic symptoms and their onset at an early age, typically in adolescents or young adults.
The physiopathological hypothesis of an anomaly relating to the renewal of cell membranes and energy metabolism in schizophrenia was proposed as early as the 1930s. This is based on anomalies at certain times in the development of the balance between phosphomonesters, precursors of membrane phospholipids, and phosphodiesters, catabolites of membrane phospholipids. Alterations of these different balances sign neurodevelopmental disorders, and can be objectified by specific techniques such as phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (SMR-31P). This is used in particular to characterize the energy metabolism of the brain and allows in vivo quantification of phosphorus metabolites.
The application of SMR-31P techniques to assess the metabolism of membrane phospholipids and cellular energy metabolism in subjects at high risk of psychotic transition could make it possible to objectify a difference between subjects subsequently suffering from a psychotic transition compared to those who do not suffer from it. Alterations in the metabolism of membrane phospholipids could thus represent a biomarker of psychotic transition. Secondarily, this approach would make it possible to provide elements as to the validity as a diagnosis of this category, which is very heterogeneous in its future.
Among the Ultra High Risk (UHR) group, subjects with a psychotic transition (UHR-T) are compared to subjects without this transition (UHR-NT) during the two years of follow-up.
The UHR group is compared to the control group.
At T0, UHR patients and healthy volunteers will perform brain MRI with Phosphorus 31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
UHR patients will then be reviewed:
- at T+1 year for a clinical assessment medical interview to assess the patient's functioning and the appearance of symptoms;
- at T+2 years for the realization of a follow-up interview with passing of the scales CAARMS (Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State) and SOFAS (scale of evaluation of the social and professional functioning) in order to determine if the subject belongs to the UHR-T or UHR-NT group.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Richard HARY
- Phone Number: 0033 5 49 44 57 57
- Email: richard.hary@ch-poitiers.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Poitiers, France, 86000
- Recruiting
- Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit
-
Contact:
- Richard HARY
- Phone Number: 0033 5 49 44 57 57
- Email: richard.hary@ch-poitiers.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria for the UHR group:
- Patient between 15 and 25 years old
- Patient fulfilling the UHR criteria objectified by the Comprehensive Assessment of At Risk Mental State scale (CAARMS) and by the social and professional functioning assessment scale (SOFAS) (the "Vulnerability" group is also taken into account, combining first-degree history and functional impact.)
- Patient with no contraindication to performing a 7T MRI examination
- Affiliated patient or beneficiary of a social security scheme.
- Free, informed consent, written and signed by the participant, the investigator and the legal representative if applicable (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).
Inclusion Criteria for the Control group:
- Subjects aged 15 to 25 years old,
- healthy volunteer subject or subject to benefit from an imaging examination, not presenting the criteria of a mental health disorder objectified by a medical interview
- Subject with no contraindication to performing a 7T MRI examination
- Affiliated subject or beneficiary of a social security scheme.
- Free, informed and written consent signed by the participant, the investigator and the legal representative if applicable (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).
Exclusion Criteria for the UHR group:
- Patient not at risk or already in a psychotic pathological process according to DSM-5 criteria.
- Patient already receiving antipsychotic treatment or whose background treatment was changed less than a month ago.
- Patient presenting an absolute contraindication to 7T MRI such as: foreign bodies (intracranial clips, vascular magnetic clips, cardiac or neural pacemakers, stents, coils, implantable chamber, intracorporeal metallic splinters, cochlear implants, intracorporeal metallic foreign bodies, mechanical heart valve, implanted injection pump, non-removable piercings), pregnant woman, allergy to contrast products, moderate to severe renal insufficiency, breastfeeding, implanted contraception, tinnitus, claustrophobia and braces.
The relative contraindications are to be considered, namely: previous surgical interventions, medically implanted device, tattoo or permanent make-up.
Exclusion criteria for the control group:
- Subject presenting an absolute contraindication to 7T MRI such as: foreign bodies (intracranial clips, vascular magnetic clips, cardiac or neural pacemakers, stents, coils, implantable chamber, intracorporeal metallic fragments, cochlear implants, intracorporeal metallic foreign bodies, valve mechanical heart, implanted injection pump, non-removable piercings), pregnant woman, allergy to contrast products, moderate to severe renal insufficiency, breast-feeding, implanted contraception, tinnitus, claustrophobia and braces.
The relative contraindications are to be considered, namely: previous surgical interventions, medically implanted device, tattoo or permanent make-up.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Patient group
Participants of this group are subjects with ultra high risk of psychotic transition. At inclusion visit, subjects will have a psychiatric evaluation and a cerebral MRI examination with phosphorus 31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in order to investigate membrane phospholipid metabolism and cellular energy metabolism. One and two years after the inclusion visit, subjects will have a psychiatric evaluation in order to objectivize if a psychotic transition has occured. |
Cerebral MRI with Phosphorus 31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Participants of this group are healthy volunteers.
Subjects will have one single visit with a psychiatric evaluation and a cerebral MRI examination with phosphorus 31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in order to investigate membrane phospholipid metabolism and cellular energy metabolism.
|
Cerebral MRI with Phosphorus 31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference of cellular inorganic phosphate between UHR-T and UHR-NT patients.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of inorganic phosphate.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular phosphocreatine between UHR-T and UHR-NT patients.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of phosphocreatine.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular Gamma ATP between UHR-T and UHR-NT patients.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of Gamma ATP.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular Alpha ATP between UHR-T and UHR-NT patients.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of Alpha ATP.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular beta ATP between UHR-T and UHR-NT patients.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of beta ATP.
|
2 years
|
Difference of intracellular pH between UHR-T and UHR-NT patients.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of intracellular pH.
|
2 years
|
Difference of membrane phosphodiester alterations between UHR-T and UHR-NT patients.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of phosphodiester.
|
2 years
|
Difference of membrane phosphomonoester alterations between UHR-T and UHR-NT patients.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of phosphomonoester.
|
2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Difference of cellular inorganic phosphate between UHR subjects and control subjects.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of inorganic phosphate.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular phosphocreatine between UHR subjects and control subjects.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of phosphocreatine.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular Gamma ATP between UHR subjects and control subjects.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of Gamma ATP.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular Alpha ATP between UHR subjects and control subjects.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of Alpha ATP.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular beta ATP between UHR subjects and control subjects.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of beta ATP.
|
2 years
|
Difference of cellular intracellular pH between UHR subjects and control subjects.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of intracellular pH.
|
2 years
|
Difference of membrane phosphodiester alterations between UHR subjects and control subjects.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of phosphodiester.
|
2 years
|
Difference of membrane phosphomonoester alterations between UHR subjects and control subjects.
Time Frame: 2 years
|
Levels measurements of phosphomonoester.
|
2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-A02708-33
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patients With Ultra High Risk of Psychotic Transition
-
Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, DenmarkCopenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research; Center for...CompletedPatients at Ultra-high Risk of PsychosisDenmark
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingClinical High Risk for Psychosis | Ultra-high Risk for Psychosis | At-risk Mental StateAustria
-
University of UdineNational Research Council (CNR), Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB)...RecruitingClinical High Risk for Psychosis | Ultra High Risk for Psychosis | Attenuated Psychotic SymptomsItaly
-
Rene KahnCompletedUltra High Risk for PsychosisSpain, Austria, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland, United Kingdom
-
University of ChicagoNorthwestern University; University of Illinois at Chicago; Rush University Medical... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingMedicare Patients | High Risk of HospitalizationsUnited States
-
Queen's University, BelfastCompletedPatients at High Risk of Medicine-related ProblemsUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, MontpellierNot yet recruitingPatients at High-Risk of a Cardiovascular Event
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedUnplanned Hospital Readmissions | Patients at High Risk of Unplanned ReadmissionUnited States
-
Stefania CostiArcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCSCompletedComplex Patients: Patients With High Level of Complexity Regardless of the Pathology of Origin
-
Greater Baltimore Medical CenterWithdrawnCancer | Patients With Clinical and Environmental Risk Factors for Cancer | Patients With a Suspected or Confirmed Diagnosis of CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Cerebral MRI with Phosphorus 31 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUnknown
-
Assistance Publique Hopitaux De MarseilleUnknown
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteUnited States Department of Defense; Oregon Health and Science University; Portland...Completed
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
Poitiers University HospitalCompletedDiurnal Variations of Cerebral MetaboliteFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingCadasil | Angiopathy; CerebralFrance
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamAmerican Fibromyalgia Syndrome AssociationCompleted
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterTerminatedProstate CancerUnited States
-
Malini MadhavanRecruitingAtrial Fibrillation | ArrhythmiaUnited States