Application and Safety Evaluation of 3D Visualization System in Microsurgical Training

Based on the relative shortage of ophthalmic surgeons in China, the long micromanipulation cycle and the existing micromanipulation training methods have their own limitations, such as traditional operating in porcine eyes limited to synchronous guidance and evaluation, while surgical simulators are very different for the simulation of real tissues, and the price is expensive and easy to lose. Based on these, the development of a digital training system, that is, based on traditional micromanipulation platforms such as animal tissue, physical microscopic instruments supplemented by synchronous surgical guidance and evaluation, can combine the advantages of traditional training and simulator, so as to improve the efficiency of ophthalmic surgeon training, and also provide digital ideas for other disciplines based on traditionally surgical teaching.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The digital vision technology are required for the daily training of microsurgeons enrolled in our study. We only observed biological indicators of surgeons before and immediately after the operation using the digital technology, according with the prospective observational study design.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Recruiting
        • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ophthalmologists

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age:20-45 years
  • Refractive diopters: spherical: - 6.00 to + 1.00 D, cylindrical: - 1.50 to - 0 D, and binocular difference less than 1.5 D
  • Monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 20/20
  • Normal stereoacuity (60 s of arc or better)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of strabismus
  • history of systemic diseases
  • history of eye surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
ophthalmologists with microsurgical training
Participants underwent training by digital and microscope, and we observed the changes of functions before and immediately after the training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change of accommodative lag between pre- and post- microsurgery under digital visualization system.
Time Frame: 5 minutes before the microsurgery and after the microsurgery within 3minutes
Accommodative lag was measured by Monocular estimation method (MEM) retinoscopy before and immediately after the microsurgery
5 minutes before the microsurgery and after the microsurgery within 3minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
heart rate variability
Time Frame: 1 minutes before the microsurgery and after the microsurgery within 1minutes
Heart rate variability is the physiological phenomenon of variation in the time interval between heartbeats. It is measured by the variation in the beat-to-beat interval. We measure heart rate variability by a wearable watch
1 minutes before the microsurgery and after the microsurgery within 1minutes
surgical performance
Time Frame: Intraoperative (When participant performs the operation, the surgical videos is simultaneously recorded.)
Surgical videos were used to assess the microsurgical performance by modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) assessment tool.
Intraoperative (When participant performs the operation, the surgical videos is simultaneously recorded.)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 13, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022KYPJ220

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Microsurgery

3
Subscribe