Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study (SiD)

April 16, 2024 updated by: Stryker Trauma GmbH

The goal of the Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study is to collect safety and performance data on the commercially available Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid device. The study will learn about standard device use in adult patients who have a functional deltoid muscle and massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tear. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the average improvement in patient-reported shoulder function after 2 years when compared to before the surgery, and
  • What is the rate of surgical revisions needed over a 10 year period

Patients will be asked to will be asked to regularly attend their check-up visits with their surgeon (including having x-rays or CT images taken to check their shoulder and implant), to complete questionnaires to report how their shoulder is doing, and to tell their surgeon when they notice any changes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid Outcomes Clinical Study is a Global, single arm, multicenter, prospective, non-significant risk Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) study, designed to collect safety and performance data on designated commercially available Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid.

The objective of this multicenter study is to collect clinical data at baseline, surgery, immediate post-op, and annually through 10 years post-operation, on related clinical complications and clinical outcomes of market-approved Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid, to demonstrate safety and performance of these implants in a real-world setting.

The primary outcome measure is the average improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score from baseline to 24 months.

Secondary outcome measures include the following assessments to be evaluated throughout the patient's participation in the study:

  • Constant Score (years 1, 2, 5 and 10 only)
  • Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Score
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • EQ-5D-5L

Radiologic imaging: Patient images (X-ray or CT) completed at baseline and in-person follow-ups will be analyzed for standard radiographic findings, including, but not limited to: device migration, component breakage, radiolucencies and bone characteristics.

Revision rate and survivorship will be assessed annually and at any time upon request for regulatory purposes such as PMCF or Clinical Evaluation Report (CER) updates. The cumulative incidence of device revisions and reoperations will be reported as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates for implant survival.

Adverse events will be evaluated from inclusion to last follow-up and will be documented during the study and categorized as whether they are serious and whether they are related to the Sponsor device or implant procedure.

During the study, patients will undergo the following procedures, which are standard of care:

  • Patient information and Consent (as applicable per local regulation),
  • Inclusion/non-inclusion criteria,
  • Demography, Height & Weight,
  • Surgical history and relevant medical history,
  • Physician exams (Range of Motion and Strength measurements),
  • Patient questionnaires (ASES, Constant, SANE, Patient Satisfaction, EQ-5D-5L),
  • Shoulder study implant & surgery related data,
  • CT scans, x-rays
  • AE / SAE collection (continuous recording).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34212
        • Recruiting
        • Coastal Orthopedics
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Avinash Kumar, MD
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43202
        • Recruiting
        • Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute OSU
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gregory Cvetanovich, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Julie Bishop, MD
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • UT Health Science center - Houston
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Program Manager - Research
          • Phone Number: 713-486-1700
        • Principal Investigator:
          • James M Gregory, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The intended patient population are adult patients who have reached skeletal maturity, with a functional deltoid muscle, and massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tear within one or more indications and zero contraindications with pain disabled by:

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (i.e. osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis)
  • Correction of functional deformity
  • Fractures of the humeral head
  • Traumatic arthritis
  • Revision of glenohumeral joint if sufficient native glenoid bone remains

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older at the time of the informed consent or non-opposition (when applicable).
  • Informed and willing to sign an informed consent form approved by IRB or EC (when applicable).
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
  • Considered a candidate for shoulder arthroplasty using a study device.
  • Meets indications for use requirements or other local, regional, or geographic specific regulatory requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not able to comply with the study procedures based on the judgment of the assessor (e.g., cannot comprehend study questions, inability to keep scheduled assessment times).
  • Patient belongs to a vulnerable group of patients, including minor patients, those unable to decide for themselves to participate or needing a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR), or others who could be subject to coercion (patients who may not be acting on their own initiative) (referred to as a "vulnerable subject" in section 3.44 of the ISO 14155:2020).
  • Active local or systemic infection, sepsis, or osteomyelitis
  • Poor bone quality, where there could be considerable migration of the prothesis and/or a chance of fracture of the humerus or glenoid (reassessed at time of surgery)
  • Significant injury to the brachial plexus
  • Inadequate bone stock in the proximal humerus or glenoid fossa for supporting the device components
  • Neuromuscular disease (e.g., joint neuropathy) Known allergy to one of the product materials
  • Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Shoulder iD device implant
Adult patients who have reached skeletal maturity, with a functional deltoid muscle, and massive and non-repairable rotator cuff tear within one or more indications and zero contraindications who will receive the Shoulder iD Primary Reversed Glenoid device to replace the shoulder joint.
Device implant via reversed total shoulder arthroplasty
Other Names:
  • Patient-Matched Primary Reversed Glenoid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance: change in functional ability of the treated shoulder
Time Frame: from baseline to 24 months
The average change in functional ability as measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. ASES is an absolute score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score indicates better shoulder function.
from baseline to 24 months
Safety: Revision rate and device survivorship
Time Frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
The cumulative incidence of device revisions and reoperations
from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance: change in level of pain and ability to carry out normal daily activities of the patient
Time Frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Assessed via the Constant-Murley Shoulder score collected at baseline, years 1, 2, 5 and 10 and any other standard collection timepoint. In this score, 35 points are allocated for subjective assessments of pain and activities of daily living and 65 points are available for objective measures of rage of movement and shoulder strength. A score of 100 is a healthy shoulder.
from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Performance: change in patient self-assessment of current status of their treated shoulder
Time Frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Assessed via the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months, and annually. The rating is from 0% to 100% with 100% being normal.
from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Performance: change in patient self-rated quality of life
Time Frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Assessed via EQ-5D-5L Five Dimensions Quality of Life measurement general health questionnaire collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months and annually. Each dimension is measured on 5 levels from 1 being no problems to 5 being extreme problems.
from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Performance: change in patient satisfaction with their shoulder
Time Frame: from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Satisfaction rating collected from patients via ePRO at baseline, 3 months and annually. Rating options are: Very Satisfied, Satisfied, Dissatisfied, and Very Dissatisfied.
from date of inclusion until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Safety: Adverse Event rate and assessments
Time Frame: from date of treatment until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years
Cumulative incidence of procedure and/or device related events (ADE, AESI, SAE, SADE)
from date of treatment until date of study exit (study completion or early termination for any cause), assessed up to 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Rebecca Gibson, Stryker Trauma and Extremities

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2035

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tears

Clinical Trials on Shoulder iD™ Primary Reversed Glenoid

3
Subscribe