- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05871268
Bridging the Health Disparities Gap in Decision-Making Among Limited English Proficient (LEP) Patients With Pelvic Floor Disorders
March 8, 2024 updated by: Thythy Pham, Loyola University
Understanding a patient's decision-making preference can help physicians meet their expectations and may increase patient satisfaction with the decision-making process.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Effective communication between patients and physicians is critical to successful health outcomes.
Limited English proficiency (LEP) is defined by the U.S. Census Bureau as anyone who reported speaking English less than "very well".
There are more than 25 million people (approximately 1 in 11 Americans) with LEP in the United States.1 LEP patients are among the most vulnerable populations.
The language barrier experienced by LEP patients hinders effective communication, impedes access to care, and impacts health care delivery.6
Research has shown that LEP patients are likely to consume more health care services7; however, they receive lower quality of care and have poorer outcomes compared to English-proficient patients on various measures: understanding of treatment plans and diseases processes, satisfaction, and incidence of medical errors.3,5,
This language-based inequity in LEP patients also hampers shared decision-making, a process in which physicians and patients make decisions together, balancing the risks and benefits with patient preferences and values.6-7
Shared decision-making is encouraged by the Institute of Medicine and US Preventative Services to foster patient autonomy and engagement.6
Similarly, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists emphasizes the importance of creating a partnership with patients.7 Research indicates that patients want to be more involved in the decision-making process but might feel that they do not have the capability to do so.8
Furthermore, the ability of patients to engage in the shared decision-making process also depends on their health literacy.
It is estimated that one-third to one-half of the U.S. adult population has low health literacy or a limited capacity to obtain, process, and understand the basic health information and services needed to make informed health decisions.8
While low health literacy affects individuals across the spectrum of socio-demographics, it disproportionately affects those with LEP.9
A knowledge gap exists in our understanding of LEP patients' roles in decision-making since most research on decision-making itself often excludes non-English speakers from study participation.
The few published reports in the oncology literature have suggested that Latinas experience barriers to informed treatment decision-making related to literacy, language, and acculturation.2,8
Hawley ST et al. (2008), in a survey of 2030 women with breast cancer, found that Spanish-preferred Latinas were more likely to report too little involvement, higher dissatisfaction, and more regrets compared to English-preferred Latinas, African Americans, and Caucasians.9
Research has shown that patients who take a more active role in their care are often more satisfied, have a better understanding of treatment plans, and experience greater improvement in health and patient-centered outcomes than do passive patients.10
Therefore, understanding these preferences, particularly in an LEP population, is necessary to meet patients' decision-making expectations, navigate discussions about treatment options, and increase patient satisfaction with the decision-making process.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
106
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Mary Tulke, RN
- Phone Number: 708-476-2186
- Email: mtulke@luc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Thythy Pham, MD
- Phone Number: 708-216-7903
- Email: Thythy.pham@lumc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Maywood, Illinois, United States, 60153
- Recruiting
- Loyola University Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Mary Tulke, RN
- Phone Number: 708-216-2067
- Email: mtulke@luc.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Present to Loyola Urogynecology clinic for their initial evaluation and identify as Spanish-speaking (as primary language)
- Agree tp complete the study questionnaires
- Must be at least 18 years of age
- Must be able to read, speak and write in Spanish
Exclusion Criteria:
- Established patients at Loyola's Urogynecology clinic
- Unable to complete the study questionnaires
- Less than 18 years of age
- Unable to read, speak and write in Spanish
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Physician Awareness
The physician will have access to the pre-visit Control Preference Scale survey results for women assigned to this group.
|
The patients' pre-visit Control Preference Scale response are shared with their physician.
|
Active Comparator: Usual Care
The physician will not have access to the pre-visit Control Preference Scale survey results for women assigned to this group.
|
The patients' pre-visit Control Preference Scale response are not shared with their physician.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To compare Limited English Proficiency patients' preferred roles with actual roles in decision-making and determine how this is altered by the physicians' awareness of the patients' preferred roles.
Time Frame: 1 day visit
|
The Control Preference Scale assesses patients preferences for involvement in decision-making.
The scale ranks patients preferences for involvement in their healthcare as either active, collaborative, or passive.
Patients' CPS responses will be compared between the interventions and usual care cohorts.
|
1 day visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thythy Pham, MD, Loyola Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Health Literacy; Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA, editors. Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2004. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK216032/
- Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ. 2002 Nov 30;325(7375):1263. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263.
- Sung VW, Raker CA, Myers DL, Clark MA. Treatment decision-making and information-seeking preferences in women with pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Sep;21(9):1071-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1155-8. Epub 2010 Apr 28.
- Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients' desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 15;20(6):1473-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1473.
- Westbay LC, Adams W, Barnes HC, Gevelinger M, McKee D, Fitzgerald CM, Acevedo-Alvarez M, Mueller ER, Pham TT. How Involved Do Patients Want to Be in the Medical Decision-Making at the Initial Urogynecology Clinic Visit? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 Mar 1;28(3):153-159. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001157.
- de Moissac D, Bowen S. Impact of Language Barriers on Quality of Care and Patient Safety for Official Language Minority Francophones in Canada. J Patient Exp. 2019 Mar;6(1):24-32. doi: 10.1177/2374373518769008. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
- Bischoff A, Denhaerynck K. What do language barriers cost? An exploratory study among asylum seekers in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 23;10:248. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-248.
- Hawley ST, Fagerlin A, Janz NK, Katz SJ. Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go? Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1366-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00843.x. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 12, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 12, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
May 23, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 12, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 8, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 217125
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Preferred Level of Involvement in Decision Making LEP Patients
-
Loyola UniversityCompletedPreferred Level of Involvement in Decision MakingUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaLeonard Davis InstituteCompletedDecision Making About Life-sustaining Treatment in Patients With Serious Cardiac, Respiratory and Oncological Conditions Likely to Limit Life ExpectancyUnited States
-
V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology...AstraZenecaNot yet recruitingElevated Level of IFN Type I in SLE Patients
-
Fayoum UniversityUnknownCompare Serum Level of Klotho in Patients on Oral Antidiabetic TreatmentEgypt
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedPhysician-Family Communication in Intensive Care Units | Surrogate Decision-making for Critically Ill Patients | Critically Ill Intensive Care Unit PatientsUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingPossibility of Using microRNA30a as a Prognostic Marker in Philadelphia Positive Leukemic Patients by Measure Level of microRNA30a in Blood Sample
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedPhysician-Family Communication in Intensive Care Units | Surrogate Decision-making for Critically Ill PatientsUnited States
-
Chun PanUnknownEvaluate the Correlation Between the Level of Mitochondrial DNA in Plasma and the Prognosis of the Patients With ARDS.China
-
Beni-Suef UniversityRecruitingInvestigation the Role of BDNF and S100B Serum Level as a Predictive of Outcome of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Treatment Lumbar Disc Prolapse PatientsEgypt
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang UniversityUnknownTo Assess the Level of Control of Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, and Blood Lipids Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Jiangxi ProvinceChina
Clinical Trials on Physician Awareness
-
Loyola UniversityCompletedPreferred Level of Involvement in Decision MakingUnited States
-
New York UniversityRecruitingMindfulness | Social Discrimination | Sexual and Gender MinoritiesUnited States
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Lund UniversityVastra Gotaland RegionCompleted
-
William D. KillgoreUnited States Department of DefenseCompleted
-
Hacettepe UniversityUnknown
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingSchizophrenia | Bipolar Disorder | Suicide | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Major Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
University Hospital, AngersUnknown
-
Mayo ClinicHeart Rhythm SocietyCompleted
-
C. Michael DunhamSt. Elizabeth Youngstown HospitalCompletedStress | Stress, Psychological | ElectroencephalographyUnited States