The Four Supports Study: Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units

January 11, 2020 updated by: Douglas White, University of Pittsburgh

A Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision-Making for Critically Ill Older Adults

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a multi-faceted communication intervention for family members of critically ill patients to reduce the family members' long-term symptoms of depression and anxiety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One in four elderly Americans die in or shortly after discharge from an intensive care unit. An expanding body of literature documents that physician-family communication and end-of-life care is poor in intensive care units. These deficiencies are associated with high rates of adverse psychological outcomes among surrogates, physician-family conflict, and life support decisions that may be inconsistent with patients' goals and preferences. There is a lack of information on practical, generalizable interventions that effectively improve this important aspect of care for elderly patients and their families.

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted communication intervention as compared to an educational control to improve psychological outcomes among family members of critically ill patients, using a randomized, controlled trial design.

This randomized controlled trial involves adding a Family Support Specialist (FSS) to the clinical team to provide four types of support to the families of patients with advanced critical illness: emotional support, communication support (between the clinical team and the family), decisional support (education about the role of a surrogate decision maker) and anticipatory grief support.

The overall aim of the study is to improve the long-term psychological outcomes for family members of critically ill patients, to improve the quality of communication and decision-making between physicians and families, and to improve the patient-centeredness of care.

What happens in the study?

Patient is randomized to one of two groups:

  1. INTERVENTION GROUP: Family Support Specialist is added to the clinical team to provide emotional support to the family and facilitate frequent communication with the clinical team.
  2. CONTROL GROUP: Receives usual care with the addition of two educational sessions provided by the FSS to teach family members about the ICU environment.

What do participants need to do?

Family Members: Interact with the Family Support Specialist daily. Family Support Specialist addresses family needs and ensures that their questions are addressed.

Physicians: Collaborate with the Family Support Specialist to determine how best to support the family as well as attending clinician-family meetings.

Sample size: With a sample size of 300 patients (450 surrogates), the study is well powered to detect small and clinically important differences in the primary outcome measure Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS).The trial's original sample size of 400 patients (600 surrogates) was chosen to maximize the power to detect differences in a secondary outcome measure (costs) that required a substantially larger sample size than the primary outcome (HADS). Since the original power calculations were conducted, new data were published which indicated that cost analysis in this context will require an even larger sample size based one effect modification from whether the patient lived or died. Therefore, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended revising the sample size to power the trial on the primary outcome (HADS), which required 300 patients (450 surrogates).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

546

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15216
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Patient Inclusion criteria:

  1. age ≥21,
  2. lack of decision making capacity as determined by clinical examination by the attending physician,
  3. APACHE II score ≥ 22, AND/OR
  4. > 40% risk of death in hospital or >40% chance of severe long term functional impairment as judged by the patient's attending physician.

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  1. lack of a surrogate decision maker and
  2. impending organ transplantation.
  3. decisions regarding care and treatment already made
  4. not currently participating in competing research study
  5. Discharged prior to enrollment
  6. Incarcerated.

Surrogate Inclusion criteria:

  1. age ≥ 18 years,
  2. self-identify as being involved in surrogate decision-making for the patient, up to a total of four family/surrogates.
  3. able to give full informed consent, and
  4. able to complete written questionnaires.

Surrogate Exclusion Criteria:

  1. age <18 years old,
  2. unable to read and understand English, and
  3. unable to complete questionnaires due to physical or cognitive limitations.

Physician Inclusion criteria:

1) Eligible physicians will be the patient's primary attending or his/her designee. If an enrolled patient is cared for by more than one attending physician during their ICU stay, each will be consented.

Physician Exclusion Criteria:

1) Study investigators will be excluded as participants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Family Support Intervention
Multifaceted family support intervention as well as ICU educational component.
The Four Supports Intervention is a multi-faceted intervention involving the addition of a trained nurse/social worker interventionist to the patient's care team who delivers four kinds of support: emotional support, communication support, decision support, and anticipatory grief support.
In addition to usual care, enrolled surrogates will receive two 15-minute education sessions about critical illness and mechanical ventilation on days 2 and 5, delivered by a research staff coordinator with education in critical care nursing.
EXPERIMENTAL: Educational Control
ICU educational component
In addition to usual care, enrolled surrogates will receive two 15-minute education sessions about critical illness and mechanical ventilation on days 2 and 5, delivered by a research staff coordinator with education in critical care nursing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: participants will be followed six months following the patient's death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 195 days
Burden of anxiety and depression will be measured in family members 6 months after enrollment using the validated 14-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS).
participants will be followed six months following the patient's death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 195 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient and family-centeredness of care
Time Frame: At 6 months
Patient and family-centeredness of care measured using the 12-item Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness of Care Scale (PPPC) adapted to use by surrogates.
At 6 months
Total Hospital Costs
Time Frame: Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
he costs are measured using aggregate data form the date of hospital admission through hospital discharge
Duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 21 days
The Intensive Care Unit length of stay , assessed by abstraction from hospital administrative records
Participants will be followed for duration of ICU stay, an expected average of 21 days
Hospital Length of stay
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Hospital length of stay length of stay , assessed by abstraction from hospital administrative records
Participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Impact of Events scale at 6 months
Time Frame: at 6 months
Symptoms of post traumatic stress in family members assessed using the validated 22 item Impact of Events Scale.
at 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance between clinicians and surrogates about patient's prognosis (CSCS)
Time Frame: Participants are followed at time of enrollment, on day 5 of enrollment, and weekly thereafter for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Prognostic estimates of survival and long-term functional impairment are measured responses by assessing the surrogate decision maker and the physician
Participants are followed at time of enrollment, on day 5 of enrollment, and weekly thereafter for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
Time Frame: Participants are followed at time of enrollment and on day 5 of enrollment

This validated instrument measures personal perceptions of:

  1. uncertainty in choosing options;
  2. modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uniformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making; and
  3. effective decision making such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice.
Participants are followed at time of enrollment and on day 5 of enrollment
Quality of Communication Scale
Time Frame: Day 5 of enrollment
Quality of communication in family members is assessed using the validated 19 item Quality of Communication Scale
Day 5 of enrollment
Impact of Events Scale
Time Frame: at 3 months
Symptoms of post traumatic stress in family members assessed using the validated 22 item Impact of Events Scale.
at 3 months
Inventory of Complicated Grief
Time Frame: At 3 months and at 6 months
This validated instrument consists of 19 first-person statements concerning the immediate bereavement-related thoughts and behaviors of the participant.
At 3 months and at 6 months
Utilization of Mental Health Treatment
Time Frame: At 3 months and 6 months
The utilization of mental health treatment is tracked via participant interview
At 3 months and 6 months
Activity of Daily Living
Time Frame: At 6 months
Functional status of the patient is assessed using the validated Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale.
At 6 months
Vital Status
Time Frame: At 6 months
Mortality of the patient will be assessed at 6 months using hospital administrative records, and the 6-month follow-up with surrogate decision makers.
At 6 months
Discharge Dispensation
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
The disposition of the patient at time of discharge will be assessed via chart abstraction
Participants will be followed for duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 4 weeks
HADS
Time Frame: at 3 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 13, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R01AG045176-01 (NIH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physician-Family Communication in Intensive Care Units

Clinical Trials on Four Supports Intervention

3
Subscribe