Nurse and Physician Stress Reduction: Learning Receptive Awareness Via EEG Feedback

March 6, 2019 updated by: C. Michael Dunham
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a model of mindfulness and neurofeedback among physicians and nurses. Several hypotheses will be tested: 1) BIS values will decrease as the number of sessions increase, 2) wellbeing scores will increase as the number of learning sessions increase, 3) wellbeing scores will be associated with BIS values, and 4) different attentional states will have more or less influence on reducing the BIS value.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For nurses and physicians, concerns exist relative to emotional exhaustion, burnout, and job dissatisfaction. In a study of medical students (median age 25 years), residents/fellows (median age 31 years), and early career physicians (median age 37 years), adverse manifestation rates were 30-40% for emotional exhaustion, 40-50% for burnout, 40-60% for depression, 7-9% for suicidal ideation, and 50-60% for fatigue. The rate of emotional exhaustion, a risk for burnout, has been found to be substantial in nurses in the U.S.

Mindfulness is an attitudinal expression of receptive awareness, wherein there is a distinction made between an experience occurring in the present moment and associated thoughts and interpretations about the experience. The thinking process itself is observed with all thoughts being treated as equal in value, without attraction or rejection. In two investigations that consisted of physicians and nurses, a high mindfulness score was associated with less stress, greater wellbeing, and a positive emotional tone among subjects. Mindfulness training has been associated with reductions in stress or burnout risk in studies that include nurses and physicians.

Neurofeedback (NFB) is a process in which an individual learns to intentionally alter their brainwave activity. NFB has been demonstrated to be useful for decreasing anxiety and enhancing attention.

As concerns with electroencephalographic (EEG) artifacts and the fact that technologies for providing quantitative EEG analysis are continuously evolving, the investigators selected the Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor (Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA) as a device to provide NFB signals. The Food and Drug Administration classifies the BIS monitor as an EEG monitoring device that monitors EEG signals, and it may be used for monitoring the effects of anesthetic and sedating agents. The credibility and validity of the device is supported by more than 2,500 citations in the National Library of Medicine that includes publications in the New England Journal of Medicine and Cochrane Systematic Review.

Reductions in BIS values have also been found for conditions other than pharmacologic sedation and include acupressure, stage I sleep, and relaxation using guided imagery.

Although combining mindfulness and NFB has been advocated, such a model, to the investigators' knowledge, has not been evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate a model of mindfulness and NFB among physicians and nurses.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

67

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Youngstown, Ohio, United States, 44501
        • St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Physicians (resident, attending, and assistant) at St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital
  • Nurses (registered, practitioner, and anesthetist) at St. Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital

Exclusion Criterion:

  • Individuals undergoing psychological or psychiatric counseling or those requiring psychoaffective medications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Receptive Awareness Training
Two 12-minute learning sessions will be conducted for each learning day. Separate instructions will be provided before session 1 and before session 2 to facilitate receptive awareness. The participant is seated in front of a BIS monitor and learns that the BIS number will decrease when in a state of receptive awareness. The trainee will learn to use attentional flexibility in daily activities and adopt willful attention (focal concentration) alternatively with receptive awareness (relaxed attention), as a situation dictates.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bispectral Index Score (BIS)
Time Frame: Up to 28 weeks
BIS values from baseline to end of study
Up to 28 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wellbeing surveillance tool
Time Frame: Up to 28 weeks
Wellbeing from baseline to end of study was assessed using the wellbeing surveillance tool, which included elements from the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale, and Maslach Burnout Inventory
Up to 28 weeks
Likert value of each attentional state
Time Frame: Up to 28 weeks
By computing a mean Likert value for each of four attentional states (all learning days), the effect of each state on reducing the BIS value was rated: 1. widening the visual field, 2. reducing effort, 3. attention to space, and 4. relaxed alertness
Up to 28 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Receptive Awareness Training

3
Subscribe