Electric Tubular Anastomosis in Rectal Cancer

May 18, 2023 updated by: LI XIN-XIANG

Application of Electric Tubular Anastomotic Device in Colorectal Tumor Surgery: a Multi-center Clinical Trial

Compared with traditional manual suturing, mechanical anastomosis can reduce the error caused by human factors. The electric anastomotic device can improve the automation and accuracy of anastomosis, reduce the requirements for doctors' operation, and establish a more standardized usage specification, thereby reducing the surgical complication rate and improving the quality of anastomosis. The clinical study of electric tubular anastomotic device adopts a multicenter, randomized, parallel controlled non-inferior study design, and randomly groups according to the 1:1 ratio to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of electric tubular anastomotic device compared with conventional manual device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Compared with traditional manual suturing, mechanical anastomosis can reduce the error caused by human factors, involving the advantages like simple operation, short operation time, fast postoperative recovery, etc. Mechanical anastomosis can also ensure the consistency and repeatability of the surgical anastomosis process. The electric anastomotic device can improve the automation and accuracy of anastomosis, reduce the requirements for doctors' operation, and establish a more standardized usage specification, thereby reducing the surgical complication rate and improving the quality of anastomosis.

The clinical study of electric tubular anastomotic device adopts a multicenter, randomized, parallel controlled non-inferior study design, and randomly groups according to the 1:1 ratio to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of electric tubular anastomotic device compared with conventional manual device.

The effectiveness of the electric tubular anastomotic device was evaluated by taking the success rate of anastomosis and anastomosis-related adverse events as the main evaluation indexes, while the operation performance evaluation, operation time, anastomosis time and postoperative recovery as the secondary evaluation indicators. The safety of electric tubular anastomotic device was evaluated by adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests, etc.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

400

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18-80y;
  • Patients with resectable rectal cancer who are scheduled to undergo Dixon surgery (definition of rectal cancer: the lower boundary of the tumor is 10 cm from the anus≤);
  • The patient consents to participate in the clinical study and signs the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with significant local or systemic severe infection;
  • Acute abdomen: intestinal obstruction, peritonitis, intestinal perforation;
  • Have a systemic underlying disease that has not been controlled, or is unstable; Patients with poor constitution or serious other organic diseases who cannot tolerate anesthesia and surgery;
  • Women during pregnancy, perinatal and lactation;
  • Patients who are mentally incapable or unable to understand the requirements of the study;
  • Patients who participated in other clinical studies 6 weeks before the start of this study or at the same time;
  • The life expectancy of patients with malignant tumors is less than 6 months;
  • Those who are critically ill and find it difficult to make an accurate evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of the device;
  • Patients with diseases who are believed not suitable to participate in this clinical study;
  • Have other diseases that are against anastomosis;
  • The patient is receiving hormone therapy or immunosuppressive therapy;
  • Albumin< 30g/dl.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: traditional anastomotic device
Traditional anastomosis is used in this group. Staplers of the same brand are uniformly adopted to avoid differences between groups caused by different brands.
Experimental: electric tubular anastomotic device

The electric tubular anastomotic device developed by Suzhou Yingtukang Medical Technology Co., Ltd. is used for colorectal end-to-end and end-to-side anastomosis. This product is suitable for open or minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.

Before firing the device, tissue thickness should be carefully assessed to prevent poor staling leading to leakage, inadequate hemostasis, or poor treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success rate of anastomosis
Time Frame: 1 week after surgery
The end-to-end and end-to-side anastomosis of the intestinal tissue is performed during the operation. After the performance of anastomosis, the instrument is withdrawn. The anastomosis should be checked of accuracy, completeness and bleeding.
1 week after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time period of anastomosis
Time Frame: during the operation
during the operation
time period of recovery
Time Frame: 1 year after surgey
time of first postoperative defecation or exhausting
1 year after surgey

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on traditional anastomotic device

3
Subscribe