Effectiveness of Dermoneuromodulation Techniques in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

May 30, 2023 updated by: Mohamed Magdy ElMeligie, Ahram Canadian University

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to investigate the benefit of applying dermoneuromodulation techniques in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain.

BACKGROUND: Chronic neck pain is one of the most commonly reported musculoskeletal pathologies in the general population. It has an immense impact on the physical, social, and psychological aspects and quality of life of the individual and society as a whole. Dermoneuromodulation(DNM) is recently popularising touch based pain relieving approach which is a gentle, structured method of interacting with patient's nervous system to help them resolve pain, regain function, and feel better. It was developed by Diane Jacobs, a Canadian physiotherapist specialised in pain science and the treatment of painful conditions. During her 40 years of practice, Jacobs was interested in Ronald Melzack, who developed the original Gate Control theory of pain along with Patrick Wall, and who later developed the NeuroMatrix model of pain. In 2007, Jacobs made a cadaver study that defined how peripheral cutaneous nerves divide into rami, which spread outward into the underside of skin. This work inspired her to develop a new conceptual approach to manual therapy for patients with pain.

HYPOTHESES We hypothesize that there will be no effect of dermoneuromodulation techniques on clinical outcomes of patients with non-specific chronic neck pain.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there a statistically significant effect of dermoneuromodulation techniques on clinical outcomes of patients with non-specific chronic neck pain?

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Giza
      • Al Ḩayy Ath Thāmin, Giza, Egypt, 3221405
        • Recruiting
        • Outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Ahram Canadian University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent history of non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP) of not less than 3 months duration.
  • Pain level greater than or equal to 5/10 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
  • Age between 25 to 40 years.
  • Both male and female participants.
  • Diagnosis of non-specific chronic neck pain confirmed by a licensed physiotherapist or physician using a combination of the following criteria:
  • Absence of specific pathologies or conditions causing neck pain (e.g., disc prolapse, tumor of the cervical spine, whiplash injury, cervical fractures, or cervicogenic headache) as assessed by clinical examination and medical history.
  • Presence of at least three of the following signs and symptoms:

    1. Restricted cervical range of motion.
    2. Pain provoked or increased with neck movement or sustained neck postures.
    3. Palpable muscle tension or tenderness in the neck or upper back region.
    4. Referred pain or symptoms to the shoulders, upper back, or arms.
  • Neck pain not attributed to a specific cause after careful evaluation, including imaging studies (e.g., X-ray, MRI, or CT scan) if deemed necessary by the clinician.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious pathology such as specific neck pain due to disc prolapse, tumor of the cervical spine, whiplash injury, cervical fractures, or cervicogenic headache.
  • Any neurological signs consistent with nerve root compression.
  • Prior surgery in the cervical region.
  • Inability to comply with the exercise program or attend scheduled sessions.
  • Contraindications to dermoneuromodulation techniques, such as active skin infections or severe inflammatory skin conditions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
Supervised Exercise Program
Participants in the control group will receive a supervised exercise program that consists of three weekly sessions in addition to home exercises, over the course of four weeks. This program will include stabilization, flexing, extension, and rotation exercises for the cervical region and self-mobilization targeting the deep neck muscles. Participants will be instructed to perform the exercises at home three times a week in a manner that did not cause pain.
Experimental: Study Group
Combination of Exercise and Dermoneuromodulation Techniques
Participants in the study group will receive the same supervised exercise program as the control group, with home exercises, in addition to two dermoneuromodulation techniques for the Dorsal Cutaneous Nerve (C3-T1), which are the skin stretch technique and kitten technique. Patients in this group will receive 3 sessions/week for a total of 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
The NPRS is an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) to measure the intensity of pain.
Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
Changes in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
The NDI is a 10-item questionnaire used to measure functional disability related to neck pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, with a total possible score of 50. Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chnages in Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
The PPT is a measure of the minimum amount of pressure applied to a specific location that elicits pain. It is assessed using a handheld pressure algometer.
Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
Changes in cervical range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
The CROM is a measure of the movement in degrees around each axis (flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation) of the cervical spine. It is assessed using a CROM device.
Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
Changes in Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
The FABQ is a 16-item questionnaire used to assess fear-avoidance beliefs related to physical activity and work in patients with musculoskeletal pain. The score ranges from 0 to 96, with higher scores indicating greater fear-avoidance beliefs.
Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
Changes in Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.
The PSEQ is a 10-item questionnaire used to assess the confidence of individuals with chronic pain in performing activities while in pain. The score ranges from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater pain self-efficacy.
Baseline, 2 weeks post-treatment, 4 weeks post-treatment, and 3 months post-treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Amal Fawzy, Ph.d, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Ahram Canadian University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 7, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 10, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 012/07EGY10000

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The researchers of this study are committed to promoting open science and collaboration among researchers. As part of this commitment, we will share de-identified individual participant data (IPD) with other qualified researchers, upon request and in accordance with applicable regulations and ethical guidelines.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified IPD will be available for sharing with other researchers starting six months after the publication of the primary study results and will remain accessible for a period of five years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

mohamed.elmeligie@acu.edu.eg

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Pain

Clinical Trials on Supervised Exercise Program

3
Subscribe