- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05903053
Pilot Study: A Telehealth Intervention for Caregivers of Infants With Early Signs of ADHD
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This project will build on the investigators' work focused on early identification of ADHD, expanding to the development of a feasibility/pilot intervention involving early intervention for such infants. The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of a telehealth-delivered, caregiver-implemented supportive intervention for infants/toddlers show early self-regulation difficulties.
Primary aims of this study include:
- Develop and test a telehealth-delivered, parent-mediated intervention targeting infant/toddler self-regulation in natural contexts, to aid both infant and caregiver learning.
- Identify, develop, and test measures/observations that can be gathered via telehealth contacts to assess ongoing change in infant and caregiver behavior over the course of the study.
- Test acceptability and satisfaction of the intervention and the telehealth delivery for families receiving the intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- UC Davis MIND Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Critera:
Infants must be enrolled in UC Davis IRB protocol #1077801 and
- Be between the ages of 12-18 months at the time of intake assessment,
- Have a first-degree relative with ADHD (parent or sibling),
- Exhibit early symptoms of ADHD based on examiner observation as indicated by at least 1 subscale on the Behavior Rating Inventory for Children (BRIC) rated 4 or higher,
- Expression of at least 1 concern about the child's behavior/development by the caregiver.
Caregivers must:
- Be identified as the infants' primary caregivers,
- Be English-speaking,
- Have access to wired or wireless network technology to access the internet in their homes.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Birth before 33 weeks' gestation,
- Known genetic disorders (e.g., fragile X syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis),
- History of traumatic brain injury,
- Severe visual, hearing, or motor impairment or fragile health condition that would prevent the child from validly participating in the assessment procedures, and
- A caregiver may be excluded from participation if the caregiver is already engaging in the majority of all possible caregiver treatment target behaviors at therapeutic levels during intake (Fidelity of Implementation scores of 80% or higher on each caregiver target behavior).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Telehealth Intervention
A multiple baseline design across subjects will be used with varying introduction of treatment elements.
Baseline periods will be 3, 5, and 7 sessions with the baseline period of 3 and 5 sessions repeated twice for subsequent participants.
An intense intervention phase will follow the baseline phase in which 45-60 minute treatment sessions will occur twice per week over the course of 4-6 weeks for a total of 8 sessions.
Each week during the intense intervention phase, caregiver coaches will introduce a new treatment technique to the caregiver and allow for caregiver practice with immediate feedback.
At the conclusion of the intense intervention phase, coaches will provide "booster" sessions with the caregivers once weekly for 1 month (4 sessions total).
|
Participants enrolled in a separate protocol (UC Davis IRB ID#1077801) will be invited to participate upon meeting eligibility criteria.
All participants will receive the intake and exit assessment battery, with the intake assessment battery being completed as part of IRBNet ID#1077801.
A multiple baseline design across participants will be used with varying introduction of treatment elements for a subset of enrolled intervention participants.
An intense intervention phase will follow the baseline phase in which 45-60 minute intervention sessions will occur two times per week for approximately 4-6 weeks for a total of 8 sessions.
At the conclusion of the intense intervention phase, coaches will provide "booster" sessions once weekly for a month (4 sessions total).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Child attention regulation
Time Frame: Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Child duration of orienting during the intervention sessions will be coded from video using a standardized behavioral coding paradigms developed within the investigators' lab.
|
Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Child inhibitory control
Time Frame: Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Child frequency of grabbing behavior during the intervention sessions will be coded from video using a standardized behavioral coding paradigms developed within the investigators' lab.
|
Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Child emotion regulation
Time Frame: Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Child frequency of negative affect during the intervention sessions will be coded from video using a standardized behavioral coding paradigms from the Lab-TAB.
Higher levels equate to more negative affect.
|
Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Caregiver Fidelity of Implementation
Time Frame: Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Caregiver fidelity of implementation (FI) of the intervention will be coded from 3-minute caregiver-child dyad intervention video probes to determine caregivers' FI of intervention techniques over the course of the study.
This involves having experts in the intervention rate caregiver use of each of the intervention strategies on a 1-5 Likert rating scale, with a code of "1" meaning the caregiver did not implement the technique throughout the session and a code of "5" meaning the caregiver implemented the technique correctly throughout the session.
An FI score of 80% (determined by total caregiver points out of the maximum possible points multiplied by 100) or higher for the entire intervention session indicates success in caregivers' FI of intervention techniques.
Higher values represent greater fidelity.
|
Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Parent Satisfaction Rating
Time Frame: Immediately following session #8 (end of week 4)
|
This is a measure of social validity, or acceptability, of the experimental treatment, to caregivers.
This tool allows caregivers to rate the ease of implementation in the home and their opinions concerning treatment utility.
Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the intervention.
|
Immediately following session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Working Alliance Scale for Interventions with Children
Time Frame: Immediately following session #8 (end of week 4)
|
This will be used to describe the response of the families to the intervention in terms of perceived alliance with the coach.
Higher scores equate to more positive working alliance.
|
Immediately following session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Lab-TAB Toy Retraction Task
Time Frame: Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
This task involves a standardized press for negative affect.
The duration of negative affect during the task will be coded from video.
Higher levels equate to more negative affect.
|
Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Parent concerns interview
Time Frame: Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
The total number of parent concerns about child behavior and development will be examined.
Fewer concerns reflects more positive outcomes.
|
Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Infant/Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire (IBQ/ECBQ) - Effortful control
Time Frame: Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
The effortful control composite scores derived from these temperament rating scales will be examined.
Higher scores reflect greater effortful control (i.e., more positive outcome).
|
Change from baseline at intervention session #8 (end of week 4)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Meghan Miller, Ph.D., University of California, Davis
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2003351
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Infant Behavior
-
Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'AlimentationCompletedInfant Behavior | Eating Behavior | Self Regulation
-
BioGaia ABAtlantia Food Clinical Trials; ActivInsightsRecruiting
-
University of ChicagoCompleted
-
Yeditepe UniversityCompletedInfant Behavior | Infant Development | Early Intervention | TemperamentTurkey
-
University of ArizonaChildren's WisconsinActive, not recruitingParent-Child Relations | Maternal Behavior | Infant BehaviorUnited States
-
Bar-Ilan University, IsraelRecruitingInfant Behavior | Breastfeeding | Mother-Infant Interaction | Smartphone AddictionIsrael
-
Swiss Tropical & Public Health InstituteWorld BankActive, not recruitingCompliant Behavior | Morbidity;InfantSwitzerland, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the
-
University of MiamiGRAMMY Museum Grant ProgramCompletedMaternal Behavior | Infant BehaviorUnited States
-
Universidad de GranadaUnknownInfant Behavior | Gestational Age Over 30 WeeksSpain
-
French Red CrossInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France; University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPhysical Activity | Growth | Diet | Sedentary Behavior | InfantFrance
Clinical Trials on Early Self-Regulation Intervention
-
University of MichiganEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedMedication Adherence | Self-regulationUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedObesity | Weight Loss | Weight Gain PreventionUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
Boston CollegeJoslin Diabetes CenterCompleted
-
Wayne State UniversityCompletedHypertension | HemodialysisUnited States
-
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompletedBreast Neoplasms | Body Weight ChangesUnited States
-
University of HoustonAmerican Cancer Society, Inc.; Herald Cancer AssociationCompletedBreast Cancer | Breast NeoplasmsUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Completed
-
Phoenix VA Health Care SystemCompletedChronic PainUnited States
-
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbHGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital; Maastricht University; Hong Kong Baptist... and other collaboratorsCompletedCARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES | HEART DISEASESChina, Germany, Netherlands