TMS + Exposure Therapy for Pediatric OCD (NExT)

January 17, 2024 updated by: Kristen Benito, Bradley Hospital

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Exposure and Response Prevention for Pediatric OCD

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare different forms of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for improving the outcomes of Exposure with Response Prevention (ERP) in youth and young adults with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Researchers will compare three groups: ERP with one of two different active ("real") forms of TMS vs. ERP with sham ("fake") TMS. The main questions this study aims to answer are: 1) whether TMS normalizes functioning in brain circuits that contribute to compulsive behavior, and 2) whether TMS reduces compulsions during ERP. Participants will:

  • Complete clinical interviews, questionnaires, and computerized tasks
  • Complete two MRIs (brain scans)
  • Receive daily TMS followed by ERP for two weeks (10 sessions)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Pediatric OCD is a public health problem and many remain symptomatic even after receiving efficacious treatments. The success of exposure and response prevention (ERP), a first-line behavioral treatment, depends on the ability to refrain from compulsions during exposure tasks. Improving this "therapy critical behavior" is a potentially important strategy for ERP augmentation. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can be leveraged to stimulate healthier functioning of brain circuits underlying therapy critical behaviors. The overall objective of this project is to test whether augmenting ERP with rTMS over cortical nodes of select cortico-striatal circuits implicated in compulsivity can normalize connectivity and enhance response prevention in youth and young adults with OCD. This project will use a masked RCT design to test whether ERP+TMS engages 1) hypothesized circuits involved in compulsivity and 2) observed response prevention during ERP exposure tasks. Youth ages 12-21 years with OCD will complete a full course of ERP plus randomly assigned TMS regimens of sham, inhibitory theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortext (dlPFC), or continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to the presupplementary motor area (pSMA; n=20 per group). Milestones for the R61 phase are determination that at least one active rTMS condition a) changes resting state functional connectivity in the hypothesized circuit within- and between-subjects and b) is safe and feasible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55414
        • Recruiting
        • University of Minnesota
        • Contact:
    • Rhode Island
      • Riverside, Rhode Island, United States, 02915
        • Recruiting
        • Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between the ages of 12 and 21 years.
  • Presence of OCD, as indicated by a score of > 16 on the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, indicating moderate or greater OCD symptoms.
  • Presence of motor compulsions on CY-BOCS compulsion checklist
  • English fluency to ensure comprehension of informed consent and study measures and instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decline to provide informed consent.
  • Has a personal history, or a family history in a first-born relative, of any medical or psychiatric disorder, disease, condition, injury, symptoms or circumstance that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, may: (1) impact the risk profile of TMS; (2) reduce the subject's ability to fulfill the study requirements as per protocol; or (3) adversely impact the integrity of the data or the validity of the study results." Some examples include: epilepsy or seizure disorder(s), bipolar disorder or any psychiatric disorder associated with a risk of mania, intracranial pathology, traumatic brain injury, brain tumor, stroke, implanted medical devices or metallic objects in the head, or moderate-severe heart disease
  • Pregnant according to the medical history or a urine pregnancy test; and menstruating females who are heterosexually active and not using a highly effective form of contraception (tubal ligation, FDA-approved hormonal contraceptive, or an IUD)
  • Inability to undergo MRI.
  • Left handedness.
  • Is deemed to be at imminent risk of suicide according to the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) (i.e. answers YES to ≥ one (1) of the four screening questions) and/or in the medical opinion of the investigator
  • History of, or risk factors for, neurocardiogenic syncope (history of syncope/ presyncope related to noxious stimuli, anxiety, micturation, or posture).
  • Concurrent psychotherapy of any kind for OCD.
  • Concurrent TMS or receipt of any TMS experimental or clinical treatment less than 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • Taking a medication deemed to pose high seizurogenic potential per physician review
  • Taking a medication that has not reached stability criterion (same medication and dose for 6 weeks with no planned changes over the study period)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ERP+iTBS
Participants will receive two weeks (10 sessions) of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS; a form of TMS) targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), followed immediately by Exposure Plus Response Prevention (ERP).
TMS will be delivered over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) using an intermittent bursting pattern
Other Names:
  • TMS
  • Neuromodulation
  • iTBS
ERP will be delivered daily, immediately following TMS
Other Names:
  • CBT
  • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
  • Exposure Therapy
  • ERP
Experimental: ERP+cTBS
Participants will receive two weeks (10 sessions) of continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS; a form of TMS) targeting the presupplementary motor area (pSMA), followed immediately by Exposure Plus Response Prevention (ERP).
ERP will be delivered daily, immediately following TMS
Other Names:
  • CBT
  • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
  • Exposure Therapy
  • ERP
TMS will be delivered over the pre supplementary motor area (preSMA) using a continuous bursting pattern
Other Names:
  • TMS
  • Neuromodulation
  • iTBS
Active Comparator: ERP+Sham
Participants will receive two weeks (10 sessions) of sham ("fake") TMS, followed immediately by Exposure Plus Response Prevention (ERP).
ERP will be delivered daily, immediately following TMS
Other Names:
  • CBT
  • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
  • Exposure Therapy
  • ERP
Sham stimulation will use the Magstim sham air-cooled coil, which produces auditory signals and appears identical to an active coil but contains a mu-metal shield that diverts the majority of the magnetic flux such that a minimal (<3%) magnetic field is delivered to the cortex
Other Names:
  • TMS
  • Neuromodulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): connectivity of the pSMA-DLS circuit
Time Frame: change from baseline at two weeks (post-treatment)
z-score representing change in resting state connectivity between presupplementary motor area (pSMA) and dorsolateral striatum (DLS)
change from baseline at two weeks (post-treatment)
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): connectivity of the dlPFC-DMS circuit
Time Frame: change from baseline at two weeks
z-score representing change in resting connectivity between dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsomedial striatum (DMS)
change from baseline at two weeks
Observed Compulsive Behavior
Time Frame: two weeks
Mean proportion of time during which compulsions are observed during ERP sessions
two weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child/Adult Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Inventory
Time Frame: change from baseline at two weeks (post-treatment)
Independent-Evaluator (IE) rated measure of OCD symptom severity. Rated on 0 (no symptoms) to 40 (most extreme symptoms) scale
change from baseline at two weeks (post-treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christine Conelea, PhD, University of Minnesota
  • Principal Investigator: Kristen Benito, PhD, Emma Pendleton Bradley Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 00072077

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will share all de-identifiable data from study measures through the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) using the data dictionaries available in NDA. As per NIMH Data Archive, data will be deidentified and assigned a Global Unique Identifier (GUID). We will also share deidentified study data via the National Database for Clinical Trials (NDCT) related to Mental Illness.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

We will upload raw data twice yearly and all other data at the time of publication or end of the project. The research community will have access to all de-identifiable data when the award ends. NDA will make decisions about how long to preserve the data. We will share the study protocol and consent form after obtaining IRB approval.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data can be accessed through the NDA by investigators working under an institution with a Federal Wide Assurance (FWA)

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: intermittent theta burst to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

3
Subscribe