Sentinel Node Biopsy in Early Oral Cancers a Tertiary Cancer Centre Experience

July 15, 2023 updated by: Richa Vaish, Tata Memorial Hospital
Sentinel node biopsy is a suitable alternative to END and is recommended in standard guidelines. Investigators have been doing SNB in their department to standardize the process for the last two years. This study aims to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the SNB performed to standardize the procedure at their institute.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Elective neck dissection (END) is the standard of care in node-negative early oral cancers.

However, it is associated with morbidity predominantly of shoulder dysfunction. Moreover, nearly 55-70% are true node-negative and are over-treated with this approach. Attempts have been made to overcome this limitation and to identify true node-negative patients. Sentinel node biopsy has shown the highest diagnostic accuracy among all other options. The SN is the first echelon node that drains directly through the lymphatics from the primary tumour. The principle of SNB is based on the fact that since it is the first echelon node, it would be the first site of regional metastasis. Therefore, the metastasis is unlikely to involve other nodal levels if the SNB is negative. It is the standard of care in breast cancers and melanoma. The concept made its way into oral cavity tumours and has been explored for over a decade in this setting. The results of the multi-institutional trial by Civantos et al. reported a high NPV of 94% of this procedure in early oral cancers that were node negative. Since then, various meta-analyses have shown that SNB has a high NPV making it a strong diagnostic modality. Schilling et al. reported the 3-year results of SNB in oral cancers in a multicentric study comprising 415 patients. The authors successfully identified the SN in 99.5% of cases and reported an FNR of 14%, which was high. Despite this, the study showed a high 3-year-disease-specific survival of 94%. Recently published Phase III Randomized controlled trials have shown that the overall survival of sentinel node biopsy is comparable to END with lesser morbidity in shoulder dysfunction. The advantage of the procedure is that only 25-30% of the patients who are SNB positive need to undergo neck dissection, and it spares unnecessary neck clearance and hence limits the morbidity in the remaining 70-75% of cases. SNB is a suitable alternative to END and is recommended in standard guidelines. However, SNB has a learning curve, it is recommended that the process be standardized, and the team should perform adequate SNB, followed by the completion of neck dissection before sparing the neck based on SNB. Investigators have been doing SNB in their department to standardize the process following the publication of level I evidence. This study aims to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of the SNB performed to standardize the procedure at the investigator's institute.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Maharashtra
      • Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400012
        • Recruiting
        • Tata Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Richa Vaish, MS. M.Ch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 to 75 years of age,
  2. Biopsy-proven invasive squamous cell carcinoma involving site among tongue and buccal mucosa
  3. T1 and T2 lesions as per AJCC TNM classification
  4. Clinicoradiologically node negative
  5. Amenable to per oral excision

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Upper alveolar or palatal lesions
  2. Large heterogeneous leukoplakia or other premalignant lesion
  3. T3/T4 lesions
  4. Lesions requiring raising of cheek flap to access for excision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: sentinel node biopsy
All patients have undergone completion neck dissection following SNB in the process of standardization. The SNB was localized by peritumoral infiltration of the nano colloid, followed by dynamic planar imaging for 30 minutes, and then SPECT was performed. The surgery was performed on the same day within 6 hours of localisation, and intraoperatively, either methylene blue or indocyanine green was used as an adjunct. Appropriately labelled sentinel nodes were assessed on the frozen section, which was then sectioned into 2-3mm slices perpendicular to the longest axis of the node and submitted entirely for microscopic evaluation. A minimum of 2 sections were evaluated, one stained with Toluidine blue and the other with rapid Haematoxylin and Eosin (HE) stain. The nodes were subsequently subjected to histopathological processing.
All patients have undergone completion neck dissection following SNB in the process of standardization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of the SNB
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, False negative rate, SNB identification rate
Through study completion, an average of 2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To study the pattern of metastasis in sentinel and non-sentinel nodes
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Level-wise frequency of SN metastasis, Frequency of metastasis in the SN basin, Frequency of metastasis to extra sentinel nodal basin
Through study completion, an average of 2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richa Vaish, MS. M.Ch, Tata Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Sentinel node biopsy

3
Subscribe