PeRinatal Outcomes With ACTive Versus Expectant Management of Women With Pre-labor Rupture Of Membranes (PROACT PROM)

July 14, 2023 updated by: Prof. Fabio Facchinetti, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

PeRinatal Outcomes With ACTive Versus Expectant Management of Women With Pre-labor Rupture Of Membranes: a Phase III, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Multicentric Trial

Term pre-labor rupture of membranes (PROM) occurs in about 12% of pregnancies and the time between PROM and delivery increases the risk of maternal/fetal infections. However, conflicting results are reported by studies investigating risks and benefits of expectant management versus induction of labor (IOL). Expectant management was associated with maternal and fetal infectious complications and subsequent increased risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Studies suggest that the increase in infectious risk for both is proportional to the increase in the time interval between the ROM and the birth, others reject this assumption.

In PeRinatal Outcomes With ACTive Versus Expectant Management of Women With Pre-labor Rupture Of Membranes (PROACTIVE PROM) on admission, PROM will be diagnosed. After 6 hours from the rupture of membranes, the woman will then be assessed for eligibility. A 1:1 randomization will follow within two hours (6-8 hours from PROM) in two distinct arms: 1) Expectant management 2) Active menagement (early IOL within 8 hours of rupture of membranes).

The first objective of this study is to evaluate whether active management of women with PROM (early induction) reduces the newborn need of respiratory support.

The secondary objectives of this study are related to the safety of the active management assessed through the rate of stillbirths, the onset of infections in both mother and fetus and the length of hospitalization of the dyads. Moreover, another objective is to reduce the use of antibiotic treatments (ATB) in both mothers and newborns.

The rationale of this study is that reducing the time between the PROM and delivery through an early IOL will reduce the adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

The hypothesis underneath this trial comes from a preliminary retrospective cohort study conducted in Modena, which included 2689 mother-neonates dyads from singleton pregnant women at term. In deliveries of ROM >24 hours significantly more neonates required ventilatory support than those born within 24 hours, although no significant differences were found regarding overt infections. According to the Cochrane database, expectant management of PROM is associated with maternal and fetal infectious complications and subsequent increased risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity together with an increased risk of ATB use. The increase of infectious risk is proportional to the time elapsed since the rupture of the membranes (ROM) and birth. However, unpublished data from our group suggest that respiratory distress requiring interventions may be frequently caused by intrinsic inflammatory-related effects of prolonged ROM rather than infection; this is suggested by an increase of C-reactive protein levels in neonates with mild respiratory signs untreated with antibiotics.

In addition, in a survey performed in our country expectant management increased intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), although not strictly indicated by the most current guidelines.

On the light of these data, it appears reasonable to promote induction of labor, to prevent complication caused not only by the infectious risk mentioned above, but also respiratory distress, probably associated to a neonatal maladaptation, in non-infectious newborns.

On the other hand, it should also be considered that 75% of women enter labor spontaneously within 24 hours from PROM and induction of labor (IOL) might not be needed in such cases.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1400

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 years of age at the time of randomization
  2. Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
  3. Negative rectovaginal GBS swab
  4. Absent/poor uterine contractile activity 6 h after PROM (0-2 contractions /10 min)
  5. Cephalic presentation
  6. Ability to provide an informed consent
  7. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prematurity (<37 weeks)
  2. GBS positive vagino-rectal swab or with an unknown swab
  3. Multiple pregnancies
  4. Previous cesarean section (CS)
  5. Breech presentation, transverse lie or other indication for elective CS
  6. Suspected clinic for intra-amniotic infection (According to the Triple I criteria)
  7. Stained amniotic fluid
  8. Alterations of the FHR
  9. Unknown exact ROM time
  10. Known hypersensitivity to drugs for IOL or their excipients
  11. Presence of unknown vaginal bleeding
  12. Presence of maternal kidney disease (GFR <15 ml/min/1,73 m2).
  13. Every condition contraindicating vaginal delivery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active management
early IOL within 8 hours of rupture of membranes. Center-specific IOL protocols will be used.
Center-specific IOL protocols, based on international guidelines, will be used.
No Intervention: Expectant management
monitoring until 24 hours from rupture of membranes, with subsequent induction of labor (IOL).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of respiratory support in newborns
Time Frame: On day 1 or 2 post-partum all relevant delivery and post-partum as well as neonatal variables will be collected.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether active management of women with PROM (early induction) reduces the newborn need of respiratory support, collecting data on Apgar score, neonatal blood gas analysis and the rate of respiratory distress after birth and rate of respiratory support divided by type. The need for neonatal ventilatory support will be evaluated at delivery and include at least one of the following measures: free flowing oxygen in incubator, low flow oxygen (<2 LPM), high flow oxygen (>3 LPM), NCPAP or other NIV, mechanical ventilation.
On day 1 or 2 post-partum all relevant delivery and post-partum as well as neonatal variables will be collected.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stillbirth and infection rate
Time Frame: On day 1 or 2 post-partum all relevant delivery and post-partum as well as neonatal variables will be collected.
This secondary objectives of this study are related to the safety of the active management assessed through the rate of stillbirths, the onset of infections in the mother and fetus and through the length of hospitalization of the dyads. Moreover, another objective is to reduce the use of antibiotic treatments (ATB) in both mothers and newborns.
On day 1 or 2 post-partum all relevant delivery and post-partum as well as neonatal variables will be collected.
length of hospitalization expressed in days
Time Frame: From day 1 after delivery to the end of the puerperium (42 days after delivery)
The lenght of hospitalization and the need for re-hospitalizations are related to the safety of the active management assessed through the rate of stillbirths, the onset of infections in the mother and fetus and through the length of hospitalization of the dyads. Moreover, another objective is to reduce the use of antibiotic treatments (ATB) in both mothers and newborns.
From day 1 after delivery to the end of the puerperium (42 days after delivery)
use of antibiotics in both mother and newborn as quantity (mg) and quality.
Time Frame: From admission in the Hospital to 42 days after delivery
The use of antibiotics will be recorded
From admission in the Hospital to 42 days after delivery
neonatal infection as the yield of pathogen from blood or CFS coltures
Time Frame: From birth to 42 days after delivery
Suspected infection is based on the presence of clinical symptoms (neonatal tachycardia, hyperpyrexia, alteration of the skin color) and abnormal laboratory markers, i.e. an increase in C reactive proteins above 1.5 mg/dl.
From birth to 42 days after delivery
Rate of Pathogen isolation in placenta's speciemen
Time Frame: Collection of speciemens immediately after delivery
Placentas and umbilical cord will be collected only in the Milano Buzzi center
Collection of speciemens immediately after delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 12, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rupture of Membranes; Premature

Clinical Trials on Induction of Labor IoL

3
Subscribe