Fully Remote Use of IpsiHand Device in Hemiparetic Stroke

July 21, 2026 updated by: Neurolutions, Inc.

IpsiHand Device Use in Hemiparetic Stroke Population to Assess Home Based EEG System Candidacy for BCI Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity and the Efficacy of a Full Remote Home Based BCI Therapy - A Randomized Control Trial

BCI-REHAB was a randomized clinical trial comparing an at-home brain-computer interface therapy system versus an at-home exercise program for upper-extremity rehabilitation in the chronic phases of stroke. The purpose of the trial was to evaluate the efficacy of BCI-based therapy tested against standard exercise therapy and assess the potential for meaningful motor improvement in the home environment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

After meeting the inclusion criteria, all participants underwent an EEG evaluation to ensure that EEG features sufficient for device control could be detected. Participants who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and passed the EEG test were randomly assigned (1:1) to either home-based BCI rehabilitation (BCI) or a Home Exercise rehabilitation regimen Program (HEP).

Participants were instructed to use the device for home-based therapy sessions 1 hour per day, 5 days per week, for a continuous 12 weeks. During the therapy sessions, the system would guide the patient through a series of routines in which they would imagine opening and closing their affected hand. At the instant the BCI detected sensorimotor cortex EEG spectral features associated with imagined ipsilateral hand movements, the handpiece opened and closed the participant's hand in a three-finger pinch grip.

Participants did not receive occupational or physical therapy services while participating in the self-directed BCI Therapy.

Participants allocated to the HEP control group received a structured home exercise program designed to control for non-specific motor and sensory engagement associated with the intervention. They completed an in-person baseline assessment of function and an HEP training session with an OT. The program consisted of a customized set of range of motion and functional tasks targeting the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder. Participants were instructed to complete 1 hour of home exercise per day, 5 days per week, over the course of 12 weeks.

The Primary outcome assessment was the in-person Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) completed on day 1 (baseline) and after 12 weeks of participation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

109

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University in Saint Louis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults age (18-85)
  2. Adults who sustained a CVA
  3. Have upper extremity hemiparesis/hemiplegia
  4. Participants who are not receiving Botox Injections for the upper extremity may be included. Should a participant be receiving Botox injections for the upper extremity, they may be included but Botox administration must be timed to coincide within a week of the beginning of training.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who are not receiving Botox Injections for the upper extremity may be included. Should a participant be receiving Botox injections for the upper extremity, they may be included but Botox administration must be timed to coincide within a week of the beginning of training.
  2. Participants who are too cognitively impaired to understand the task or provide informed consent will be excluded. A Short-Blessed Test score of 8 or more will be excluded.
  3. Participants who have contractures in the affected wrist and digits will be excluded, as the device will not comfortably fit.
  4. Participants who have receptive aphasia and unable to follow written directions will be excluded. A score of 6 or less on the MS Aphasia Screening Test will be excluded.
  5. Participants receiving any formal upper extremity therapy will be excluded.
  6. Participants with ataxia apraxia or severe psychiatric illness (other than post stroke depression) will be excluded.
  7. Participants who are pregnant or breast-feeding will be excluded.
  8. Participants who have nerve or sensory impairment that may limit or interfere with their ability to sense pain will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home Based BCI Rehabilitation (BCI)
Participants were instructed to use the device for home-based therapy sessions 1 hour per day, 5 days per week, for a continuous 12 weeks.
Electroencephalography (EEG)-driven upper extremity powered exerciser. An EEG-driven upper extremity powered exerciser is a non-invasive prescription device intended for rehabilitation by driving movement or exercise of an impaired upper extremity in response to the detection of purpose oriented electrical activity produced by the patient's brain.
Active Comparator: Home Exercise rehabilitation regimen Program (HEP)
The program consisted of a customized set of range of motion and functional tasks targeting the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder. Participants were instructed to complete 1 hour of home exercise per day, 5 days per week, over the course of 12 weeks.
The program consisted of a customized set of range of motion and functional tasks targeting the hand, wrist, elbow, and shoulder. Participants were instructed to complete 1 hour of home exercise per day, 5 days per week, over the course of 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer (UEFM)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Assessment tool of upper extremity motor function. Lowest score 0, highest score 66.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurolutions Upper Extremity Remote Assessment (Remote Digital Fugl Meyer)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 week, 4 week, 6 week, 8 week, 10 week and 12 week completion assessment
Shortened and validated digitized assessment tool derived from the Fugl-Meyer Long form developed by Neurolutions of upper extremity motor function in persons chronic stroke with moderate to severe deficits. Embedded into study software. Lowest score 0, highest score 66.
Baseline, 2 week, 4 week, 6 week, 8 week, 10 week and 12 week completion assessment
Pinch force (Dynamometer)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Evaluation of two and three point pinch strength via dynamometry; lowest score= 0lbs, highest score =150lbs
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Gross Grasp (Dynamometer)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Evaluation of gross grasp strength via dynamometry; lowest score= 0lbs, highest score =150lbs
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Motricity Index (Shoulder, Elbow, Pinch)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Evaluation of motor strength on the shoulder, elbow and pinch. Scored on a 0-5 scale. 0 being totally absent muscle strength and range of motion, 5 bring full strength and range of motion of limb.
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Western Aphasia Battery (Bedside Record Form)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Assessment of language function for classification of aphasia following a stoke.
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Assessment functional mobility and fall risk
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
10 Meter Walking Test
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Assessment functional mobility, speed of mobility and fall risk
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Arm Motor Ability Test (4 Subtests Only)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Assessment to evaluate upper extremity function in activities of daily living
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Trail Making Test- Parts A and B
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Assessment of general cognitive function specifically assesses working memory, visual processing, visuospatial skills, selective and divided attention.
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
A widely used assessment tool for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in people who have experienced stroke or other neurological conditions. The sale ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death), and is commonly used as a primary outcome measure in stroke clinical trials.
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
PHQ-9
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment

A widely used assessment tool for self reporting of depression. This assessment is scored from 0-27.

0-4: Minimal or no depression. 5-9: Mild depression. 10-14: Moderate depression. 15-19: Moderately severe depression. 20-27: Severe depression.

Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Widely used questionnaire designed to assess the level of burden experienced by caregivers
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
The Barthel Index
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 week completion assessment
Assessment tool that measures a person's functional independence in activities of daily living and self-care
Baseline and 12 week completion assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexandre Carter, MD, PhD, Washington University in Saint Louis

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data Supplement is available upon written request per NIH guidelines.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe