Ipsihand Device Use in Stroke Patients to Assess Functional Motor Outcomes

December 17, 2021 updated by: Neurolutions, Inc.

Ipsihand Device Use in Stroke Patients to Assess Motor Recovery of the Upper Extremity and Functional Outcomes

This study aims to evaluate the impact of the Neurolutions Upper Extremity Rehabilitation System, known as IpsiHand, on improving functional motor control for post-stroke patients with hemiparesis. The Neurolutions System is a brain-computer interface (BCI) comprised of a robotic orthosis, worn on the hand and wrist, and operated by the patient's brain waves which are measured by EEG electrodes. The system also utilizes a tablet interface to provide therapy instructions to the patient.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants will complete 12 weeks of home therapy with the Neurolutions IpsiHand System. Outcomes will be based on a comparison of the patient's baseline measurements to post-therapy assessments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Cruz, California, United States, 95060
        • Neurolutions
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Neurolutions

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 6-months or more post stroke
  • Presentation of upper extremity hemiparesis or hemiplegia
  • Participants must english speaking
  • Demonstrate intact cognition to provide informed consent
  • Botox injections are allowed, and must continue regimen at regular intervals throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria -

  • Not active in another clinical study
  • Not receiving formal therapy for the upper extremity
  • No use of other modalities or technologies to the upper extremity
  • Cognitive Impairment: Short Blessed Test Score 9 or above
  • Significant Spasticity: Modified Ashworth Scale score 3 or more at the elbow
  • Significant Hemispatial Neglect: Mesulam Cancellation Test 3 or more unilaterally
  • Insufficient Strength: Motricity Index score for shoulder abduction 18 - Any contractors of the affected upper extremity that would not allow the IpsiHand robotic exoskeleton to be worn comfortably and/or safely for device use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IpsiHand Device
All participants will receive treatment with the IpsiHand Device.
The IpsiHand system utilizes a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) to enable operation of a robotic hand exoskeleton worn on the hand and wrist as participants are guided through a rehabilitation program on a tablet. Participants will complete 12 weeks of hometherapy with the IpsiHand system. Motor function of their impaired upper extremity will be evaluated at baseline, at 4-week intervals, and 12 weeks completion of IpsiHand use.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity
Time Frame: "Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity" average change in points from the baseline average score and 12-week average score.
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. It is applied clinically and in research to determine disease severity, describe motor recovery, and to plan and assess treatment. The FMA is a score on a scale of 0 to 66 points. A lower score indicates impaired motor function in the upper extremity assessed. A higher score on the scale indicates better motor function of the upper extremity. A score of 66 would indicate there is no motor function impairment of the upper extremity.
"Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Upper Extremity" average change in points from the baseline average score and 12-week average score.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Arm Motor Ability Test Change Points on Scale From Baseline to 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Change in AMAT score (points) from Baseline to 12 Weeks
The Arm Motor Ability Test (AMAT is used to measure functional limitation in the upper extremity in rehabilitative trials enrolling individuals with stroke primarily. The measure requires clients to perform 28 common unilateral and bilateral UE tasks. Performance on each task is timed by the evaluator and rated by the evaluator using a 6-point Functional Ability Scale from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicates no attempt moving the affected upper extremity in the task. A score of 5 indicates one is using their affected arm with full movement, normal. One can achieve a total a range of 0 points to 140 points
Change in AMAT score (points) from Baseline to 12 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alexandre Carter, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on IpsiHand Therapy

3
Subscribe