Can Second Resection for pT1 Bladder Cancer be Avoided After Initial En-Bloc Resection With Negative Safety Margins

August 2, 2023 updated by: Mansoura University

Can Second Resection for pT1 Bladder Carcinoma be Safely Avoided After Initial En-Bloc Resection With Negative Vertical and Horizontal Safety Margins: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this [ Can second resection for pT1 bladder carcinoma be safely avoided after initial En-Bloc Resection with negative vertical and horizontal safety margins ? is to assess the impact of avoiding re TUR on Recurrence free survival, progression free survival and cancer specific survival in patients with pT1 bladder cancer treated with ERBT and intravesical BCG through a RCT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bladder cancer (BC) is the one of the most prevalent cancer in Egypt representing nearly 30% of all cancers. Approximately 75% of newly diagnosed BC present with non-muscle invasive disease (NMIBC). Initial treatment for most BCs includes transurethral resection (TUR) of the tumor to obtain tissues sufficient for histo-pathological examination to determine if the tumor reaches the muscular proprietary or not.

In the setting of non muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (NMIBC) especially T1HG, several studies showed a benefit of performing repeat resection within 2- 6 weeks to ensure adequate resection and exclude invasion of muscle layer.

However, several issues make this recommendation ie. Re-TUR at least debatable . First, most of these recommendations are based on heterogenous studies that didn't report cancer specific survival (CSS). The risk of upstaging to muscle-invasive disease at re-TUR i did not exceed 7% in recent series . Moreover, the potential complications of re TUR that include bladder perforation and extravasation may delay administration of intravesical BCG and this delay is associated with increased risk of tumor recurrence and progression.

On the other hand, several studies have demonstrated that presence of detrusor muscle (DM) in the initial specimen is a surrogate marker of resection quality and was associated with less incidence of residual tumor at the re TUR. New techniques like En-bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) entails a circumferential incision around the tumor with 5-10 mm safety margin, then proceed to deep muscle layer underneath the tumor where it is dissected using a combination of blunt dissection and laser or diathermy energy. This technique allows accurate assessment of the depth of invasion and the infiltration pattern of NMIBC and thus improving the accuracy of pathological diagnosis.

Recently published articles on this topic reported a higher rate of detrusor muscle in the specimen (96%) with enbloc compared to conventional TURB.

In a retrospective analysis of 106 patients with pT1 bladder cancer treated with ERBT, 50 patients underwent re-TUR and no significant benefits in terms of RFS and PFS to performing a reTUR in all patients with pT1 on initial ERBT.

Residual tumors were found in 6 patients (12%) and none of them were upstaged to T2 disease. Interestingly, no residual disease or recurrence overtime at the initial ERBT site in patients with negative horizontal safety margins and residual tumor was found in 2 out of 45 patients with negative vertical safety margins

Aim of Work

The aim of this study is to assess the impact of avoiding re TUR after initial enbloc resection of primary tumor with negative safety margins on recurrence free survival (RFS) ,progression free survival (PFR) and cancer specific survival (CSS ) in patients with pT1 bladder cancer through a RCT.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

370

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35516
        • Recruiting
        • Urology and nephrology center, Mansoura University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Male and female patients treated with ERBT and diagnosed with pT1 disease with negative vertical and horizontal safety margins at final pathology.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Patients treated with ERBT and diagnosed with pT1 disease with negative vertical and horizontal safety margins at final pathology.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Large tumors not suitable for ERBT
  • Residual tumor.
  • Multicentric tumors ( more than 4 lesions)
  • Presence of CIS.
  • Positive vertical or horizontal safety margins after initial resection.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Re_TUR
Those patients diagnosed with pT1 after initial ERBT with negative vertical and horizontal safety margins will undergo second look as endorsed by the guidelines.
Those patients diagnosed with pT1 after initial ERBT with negative vertical and horizontal safety margins won't undergo second look as endorsed by the guidelines.
No re_TUR
Those patients diagnosed with pT1 after initial ERBT with negative vertical and horizontal safety margins won't undergo second look as endorsed by the guidelines and will receive directly intravesical BCG
Those patients diagnosed with pT1 after initial ERBT with negative vertical and horizontal safety margins won't undergo second look as endorsed by the guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of avoiding repeat resection on recurrence and progression free survival.
Time Frame: 12 month
occurrence of new tumors or progression of the primary tumor will be compared between both groups. Tis will be assessed by both cystoscopy and MRI findings
12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
perioperative complications associated with re TURBT
Time Frame: 12 month
The incidence of perioperative complications after repeat resection will be documented and compared between both groups. This outcome will be assessed using Dindo-Clavien classification.
12 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The financial cost associated with performing repeat resection.
Time Frame: 12 months
Financial cost of repeat resection will be assessed in USD and compared between both groups.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mahmoud Laymon, MD,MRCS, Urology &Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer Stage I

Clinical Trials on Avoid second resection after initial complete resection

3
Subscribe