Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Improved Outcomes in Pediatric Otolaryngologic Surgery

January 4, 2024 updated by: University of Minnesota
Literature on the use of superficial cervical plexus blocks for ear surgery is sparse in general, and almost non-existent in the pediatric population. Overall, literature review supports the safety of performance of this block but there is minimal published literature on its utility despite anecdotal evidence of benefit. This study, especially its prospective randomized nature will allow for expansion of the evidence for or against addition of this block to the care of pediatric patients undergoing ear surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine if SCPB plus standard practices provides superior pain control, as measured by reduced opiate consumption, compared to standard practices alone when performed on pediatric patients undergoing surgery on the ear and mastoid process.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • Recruiting
        • University of Minnesota
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: <18 years and >3 months
  • Surgical procedure: Unilateral cochlear implant or tympanomastoidectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Preoperative opiate use within the last 30 days
  • Bilateral surgery
  • No English speaking caregiver
  • Parental/patient refusal
  • Severe preoperative respiratory compromise
  • Allergy to ropivacaine
  • Coagulopathy: Defined by INR>1.5 or Platelet count <100k
  • Current Infection at site of injection
  • VP Shunt on side of surgical procedure
  • Pregnant patients: determined by patient history and available laboratory data. Patients will not be required to have pregnancy testing done if not otherwise indicated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Group 2
will receive SCPB with saline via regional anesthesia team
Experimental: Group1
will receive SCPB with ropivacaine via regional anesthesia team

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid use
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
measured on a MME per kilogram
30 days post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraoperative opiate use
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
Assessed via chart review of opiate administration on an MME basis
30 days post surgery
post-operative opiate use
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
30 days post surgery
Pain level
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
Pain level will be assessed via total pain scores via either FLACC or Wong-Baker Faces, both are pain scales from 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain imaginable. These scales are interchangeable and will allow both patients who can read and younger patients who cannot read to rate their pain.
30 days post surgery
Quality of Recovery
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
Assessed via modified version of the quality of recovery survey. The quality of recovery scale is a validated document for assessing recovery after surgery. The study will use a modified version of this with language changed for parental assessment of Quality of recovery, but the same questions and scale are used.
30 days post surgery
Post Anesthesia Care Unit anti-emetic use
Time Frame: 30 days post surgery
Assessed via chart review of post-operative care unit medication administration
30 days post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Fuller, MD, University of Minnesota

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Otolaryngologic Surgery

Clinical Trials on ropivacaine

3
Subscribe