International Post-Stroke Epilepsy Research Repository (IPSERR)

January 25, 2024 updated by: Yale University

International Post Stroke Epilepsy Research Repository to Characterize Post-stroke Epilepsy Population and Their Outcomes

The International Post-Stroke Epilepsy Research Repository (IPSERR): The study aims to collate and categorize data reported by post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) researchers and lodge it within the IPSERR. Using the IPSERR database, we will conduct two individual patient data (IPD) analyses: (1) determine epilepsy, functional, and cognitive outcomes in stroke patients who develop post-stroke seizure and (2) build and validate post-stroke epilepsy prediction model and compare performance against existing models.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The cerebrovascular disease is the most common cause of late-onset epilepsy. PSE is associated with increased morbidity, including cognitive decline, dependence, and poor quality of life, and is a critical determinant factor of stroke prognosis. We recently reported a systematic review and meta-analysis of 71 papers that suggested that post-stroke seizures are associated with more significant mortality and poor functional and cognitive outcomes (PMID:37721736). In this study, we observed disparate methods used by the individual investigators. We also noted variations in study reporting. PI aims to analyze existing individual patient data, including those analyzed in the systematic review, by collaborating with colleagues in the field and developing IPSERR into a resource for future collaborative studies that will tackle anti-epileptogenesis drug trial design.

Design and Rationale:

  1. International Post-Stroke Epilepsy Research Repository (IPSERR): The PI convened the International Post-Stroke Epilepsy Research Consortium (IPSERC) with co-convenor Dr. Patrick Kwan, Monash University, Australia. IPSERR was subsequently founded to collect retrospective and prospective PSE data to promote all aspects of PSE research. Participating centers will obtain legal approvals for human subject research as per the requirements of their jurisdiction. The PI (NKM) has IRB approval for IPSERR. A data use agreement (DUA) will be executed to receive data. The PI will invite the authors of all 71 papers in the systematic review to join IPSERC and request them to contribute data to IPSERR. A protocol (including the charter) for the proposed IPD analyses has been accepted for publication and will be available to the collaborators for review.
  2. The PI will use the Yale Center for Research Computing (YCRC) resources to manage IPSERR's clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological data.
  3. The PI will use Redcap for clinical data management. The Redcap server is housed within the Yale-New Haven Hospital secured data center behind their firewall. The databases are encrypted at rest for HIPAA compliance. Full database backups are made twice daily, seven days a week.
  4. Study duration: 2023-2029
  5. Rationale: Collaboration is vital for PSE research. This is because approximately 10% of stroke patients develop PSE. Together, investigators can collect a large sample of the PSE patient population and conduct robust analyses to draw meaningful conclusions. The collation of IPD from many different sources involving different interventions and stroke subpopulations will strengthen our ability to provide data for future research on many topics relating to PSE. The availability of high-speed internet has made it easier than ever to work closely with colleagues worldwide and share data. There are many examples of such successful efforts. For example, PI Dr. Mishra closely worked with the SITS-ISTR registry at Karolinska University, Stockholm, and the Virtual Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) at the University of Glasgow, UK. These two international efforts recorded tPA and stroke trial data, respectively, and provided them for testing several hypotheses. Dr. Mishra subsequently worked at the US FDA, where he was exposed to other large collaborative scientific efforts like MDEpiNET. The PI seeks to capitalize on his experiences, network of colleagues worldwide, and recent technological advancement in data science to build the IPSERR. We anticipate that the IPSERR will bring together large datasets from previously conducted PSE research that would otherwise ordinarily remain dormant. The PI will request data from the authors of papers included in the systematic review (N=71 papers reporting approximately 20000 PSE patient data) and from the IPSERC members. The PI will report IPSERR in the first year and the results of the two research projects anchored on it in the second year. The PI will recognize that not all authors of the previously published literature in our systematic review will have data to share. However, even if 20% of the patient data is obtained from those studies, the PI expects an extensive database of approximately 8000 patients. With this success, the PI expects the IPSERR to continue growing. IPSERR will catalytically advance PSE research because it will provide the PSE research community with an extensive database for hypotheses testing and a framework to anchor future prospective studies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

8000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • Yale University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with stroke aged ≥18 years, with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, presenting with early or late post-stroke seizures. Patients presenting ≤1 week will be classified as early seizures and >1 week will be classified as late seizures.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Studies with minimum dataset of 100 patients
  • Studies comprising stroke patients aged ≥18 years, with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, presenting early or late PSS with data on patient outcome measures.
  • Documented consent or waiver of consent following local Institutional Review Board-approved procedure.
  • Studies published on human subjects.
  • No restriction based on the date or language of publication, gender, or ethnicity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Studies of patients with a prior history of seizures before the index stroke,
  • Studies that did not report outcome data, or are not able to share IPD.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Post-stroke epilepsy
Stroke patients aged ≥18 years, with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, presenting with early or late onset post-stroke seizures.
Presence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by neuroimaging and clinical diagnosis
No post-stroke epilepsy
Stroke patients aged ≥18 years, with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, presenting with no post-stroke seizures.
Presence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by neuroimaging and clinical diagnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality (modified Rankin Scale = 6)
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a clinician-reported measure of global disability for evaluating recovery from stroke. It ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death).
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale 3-6)
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a clinician-reported measure of global disability for evaluating recovery from stroke. It ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death), with 0-2 indicating a good functional outcome and 3-6 indicating a poor functional outcome.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Seizure frequency
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Number of seizures post-stroke identified clinically or based on an electroencephalogram (EEG).
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Seizure severity
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Defined by impaired awareness and the presence of bilateral tonic or clonic seizures.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Occurrence or frequency of status epilepticus
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Status epilepticus is defined as a seizure or series of seizures lasting more than 30 minutes without recovery of consciousness based on electroencephalogram (EEG) findings.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
The duration of hospital admission for a stroke is measured in days.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Cognitive decline assessed on an 11-question Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) tool or a 30-point Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
MMSE is tests cognitive function. It is scored out of 30, with a score of ≤26 indicating cognitive impairment. MoCA assesses mild cognitive dysfunction. It is scored out of 30, with a score of ≤24 indicating cognitive impairment.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrent stroke
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
A diagnosis of a subsequent stroke will be made based on neuroimaging.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Antiseizure medication discontinuation
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Switching of antiseizure medication (ASM) defined as discontinuation of one ASM and starting of another due to adverse events or treatment ineffectiveness.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Treatment adverse events
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Adverse events are defined as any side effects occurring due to antiseizure medication administration during the course of the study.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Depression assessed on 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
HAM-D is a tool used to assess depression symptoms. Depression post-ASM administration is defined as HAM-D score of 0-13 mild; 14-17 mild to moderate; >17 moderate to severe depression.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
Anxiety assessed on 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)
Time Frame: At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up
HAM-A is a psychological questionnaire that measures the severity of a patient's anxiety. Anxiety post-ASM administration is defined as HAM-A score of <17 mild; 18-24 moderate; 25-30 moderate to severe anxiety.
At 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nishant K Mishra, MD PhD, Yale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The PI (NKM) will create a centralized database, collect, and analyze PSE patient data, and establish common data protocols. IPSERR welcomes all PSE researchers as impartial members, granting membership to institutions. Each organization will have a role in the IPSERR steering committee. One named individual, usually the principal investigator of the contributing study, will represent the institution in the IPSERR. Steering committee members will review and approve research proposals. To address data concerns like confidentiality, reliability, and authorship, strict guidelines will be set for handling patient data, promoting ethical data sharing and collaborators' involvement in publications. Data will be securely stored, and access will be restricted to authorized individuals. The IPSERR constitution will define eligibility, data protection, storage, compatibility, and documentation.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Presence of stroke, either ischemic or hemorrhagic (intracerebral and subarachnoid)

3
Subscribe