Motivating Physical Activity With Behavioural interVention and Electrical Stimulation Remotely in Intermittent Claudication (MAvERIC)

February 22, 2024 updated by: Glasgow Caledonian University

Motivating Physical Activity With Behavioural interVention and Electrical Stimulation Remotely in People With Intermittent Claudication (MAvERIC): a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) is a common vascular disease which commonly causes limb pain and reduced exercise tolerance termed Intermittent Claudication (IC). People with PAD and IC have impaired quality of life, reduced walking ability, and increased mortality compared to those who do not have the condition.

Improving physical activity (PA) is important in individuals with IC it can improve function, morbidity and mortality rates. While supervised exercise classes are recommended by healthcare authorities they are geographically sparse, and not always accessible due to individuals walking limitations. While home-based exercise can be accessible and improve walking ability, it can be challenging for people with IC to initially plan, conduct, and stay motivated to complete a walking program unsupported, especially when they experience limb pain when walking.

Investigators have shown that Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), a non-invasive pain management device, with aims to improve pain and walking distances in patients with IC may be an acceptable modality alongside advice and support from a physiotherapist to overcome these challenges. Investigators have also shown that motivational interviewing, education, and goal-setting with a physiotherapist (physical therapist) has the potential to increase PA, and quality of life.

This study aims to conduct a feasibility trial of four telehealth physiotherapy sessions, alongside the provision of a CE-marked TENS device to reduce limb pain during physical activity. This will be compared to the usual care offered in NHS Lanarkshire

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) is a common vascular disease which is symptomatic in 2.4% of 50 to 89 year olds in the UK population. Symptomatic PAD initially presents clinically as limb pain and reduced exercise intolerance termed Intermittent Claudication (IC). Patients with PAD and IC have impaired quality of life due to reduced physical capacity and 3-4 times increased mortality compared to age and sex matched controls.

Improving daily physical activity (PA) is particularly important in individuals with IC as lower PA levels have been recognised as a strong predictor of increased morbidity and mortality in this population. Supervised exercise programs are recommended in clinical guidelines with proven efficacy to help increase physical activity, improve quality of life and contribute to secondary prevention of adverse cardiovascular events (ACVE). Despite this, provision of classes is varied geographically in the UK, and generally is centralised away from rural areas, which may limit uptake and adherence. An alternative to this exercise format may be home-based exercise in the format of a walking-based behaviour change intervention. Home-based exercise for people with intermittent claudication demonstrate a low number of related adverse events, and in the case of walking-based programmes, are likely more accessible, require little equipment, and involve increasing an activity of daily living (ADL) in people with intermittent claudication. Therefore, there is a need for investigation to the acceptability of novel methods of increasing physical activity in a home-based setting.

Lack of self-efficacy, attributed to poor understanding of the disease and uncertainty regarding the importance of exercise, has been shown to be a major barrier to exercise uptake in patients with PAD and IC. Moreover, home based exercise for the self-management of IC is less established in the literature than SEP and there are concerns of low adherence without clinician monitoring. However, if an engaging intervention feasible to the patient and healthcare provider can be established there is potential for greater equality in care, reduced healthcare utilisation and improvement of self-management of PAD in the population.

A proposed intervention to augment walking based physical activity is Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS a low-cost, non-invasive pain management device with aims to improve pain and walking distances in patients with IC. In our exploratory study we demonstrated that TENS applied to the lower limb during treadmill walking significantly improved pain and increased treadmill walking distances above placebo levels. In addition, Motivating Structured Walking Activity in People with Intermittent Claudication (MOSAIC) is a walking based behavioural intervention utilising motivational interviewing to help people with PAD and IC increase their physical activity. This may help patients plan and overcome barriers to increasing their physical activity by joint clinician and patient set physical activity goals. Both TENS and MOSAIC have potential for remote delivery which could have effects on secondary prevention of ACVE alongside improved function and quality of life for this high-risk group, and ensuring that patients can continue to undertake exercise where it is not feasible to attend SEP, or where fluctuations in social-distancing restrictions occur.

Although TENS and behavioural interventions have been utilised previously in this population to improve physical activity. Neither MOSAIC or TENS have been utilised with aim to improve free living physical activity measured using an accelerometer, and there is a lack of data investigating these outcomes with home based exercise in general. While the author is aware of ongoing works investigating these outcomes, no trial to date has been developed a priori to evaluate the delivery of these treatments remotely in this population.

The primary aim of MAvERIC is to determine the acceptability and feasibility of electrical stimulation via a low-cost CE-marked device, and a remotely delivered walking based behavioural intervention (MOSAIC) in patients with PAD, compared to usual care.

The following research questions will be answered by this project:

  1. What is the feasibility (i.e. recruitment and retention rates, adherence, safety, sample size for a definitive trial, potential for effectiveness) of conducting a definitive RCT utilising TENS or MOSAIC as an intervention compared to usual care?
  2. How acceptable is TENS and MOSAIC interventions to patients with IC?
  3. What are the effects of TENS and MOSAIC as interventions on free living physical activity, pain related, and quality of life PROMs?

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Lanarkshire
      • Glasgow, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom, G75 8RG
        • Recruiting
        • NHS Lanarkshire
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sean Paul Carroll, PhD Candidate
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chris Seenan, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) including resting ABPI <0.9 in at least one leg
  • Stable IC for ≥3 months
  • Walking limited primarily by claudication
  • Able to read and speak English to a level allowing satisfactory completion of the study procedures
  • Able to provide written informed consent for participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned surgical or endovascular intervention for PAD within the next 3 months
  • Critical limb ischaemia
  • The presence of any absolute contraindications to exercise testing/training as defined by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM)
  • Previous experience of using TENS for PAD
  • Contraindications to TENS (including epilepsy, dermatological conditions, indwelling electrical pumps/pacemakers) and inability to apply TENS independently.
  • Patients who require walking aids including artificial limbs
  • Major surgery, myocardial infarction or stroke/ TIA in the previous 6 months
  • Co-morbidities that cause pain or limit walking to a greater extent than IC (e.g. severe arthritis, respiratory conditions)
  • Severe peripheral neuropathies above the ankle.
  • Participation in another research protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Walking exercise behaviour change intervention + TENS
Participants in the Intervention groups will be asked to attend four telehealth appointments with a physiotherapist. They will also be provided with a TENS machine and training at the baseline appointment on how to use it. They will be instructed to use it daily as their symptoms require for 12 weeks. The device will be set at High Frequency-TENS (120 Hz, 200µs and a patient-determined intensity of ''strong but comfortable'').

MOSAIC: Participants in this group receive two 60-minute individual video telehealth consultations (on weeks one & two) and two 20-minute follow-up telephone calls (weeks six & 12) delivered at a convenient time over the internet. All sessions are delivered by a trained senior/band 6 physiotherapist. All participants randomized to this arm are provided with a pedometer and a patient manual which include information on intermittent claudication (IC), risk factors, walking guidelines, goal setting, problem solving and action planning worksheets and a walking diary.

HF-TENS - TENS is a form of electrical stimulation that provides symptomatic pain relief that is used extensively within the health-care setting. It is a non-invasive modality; packaged in a small, portable unit that is easy to apply via small electrodes placed on the skin. Participants will be asked to use TENS during their everyday walking-based tasks, and any planned walking activity they undertake.

No Intervention: Usual Care control
Usual Care at NHS Lanarkshire Vascular Services and/or Intermittent Claudication service.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment rates
Time Frame: End of Study (12 weeks)
Measure recruitment rates (ratio of patients who consent to participate to potentially eligible patient recorded via the study screening log
End of Study (12 weeks)
Participant retention rate
Time Frame: End of Study (12 weeks)
Ratio of patients who completed the intervention and outcome assessment to the patient who consented
End of Study (12 weeks)
Adverse events
Time Frame: End of Study (12 weeks)
Record defined adverse events in all groups
End of Study (12 weeks)
Uptake of interventions
Time Frame: End of Study (12 weeks)
Measure uptake of intervention via log of TENS use and attendance at physiotherapy appointments and follow up phone calls
End of Study (12 weeks)
Qualitative analysis of participant experience of trial
Time Frame: End of Study (12 weeks)
Analysis of semi-structured discussions with participants regarding experience of trial and interventions
End of Study (12 weeks)
Theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) questionnaire
Time Frame: End of Study (12 weeks)
Quantitative measurement of Acceptability of Intervention compared with usual care
End of Study (12 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in daily physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Total number of steps (activpal step counts)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Change in daily physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Upright and sitting events
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Change in daily physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Walking events
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Change in daily physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Event-based claudication index (ratio of walking events to upright events) participants undertake in a day
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Change in daily physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Total duration of walking activity in minutes and seconds
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Patient Reported Outcome Measure
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Disease specific quality of life will be as assessed using the Intermittent Claudication Questionnaire (ICQ).
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Generic quality of life via the EQ-5D-3L
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Pain quality will be recorded using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Average Pain intensity in the past 7 days will be recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Pain self-efficacy via. the Pain Self-Efficacy (PSEQ)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)
Pain Catastrophizing via. the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months (follow up), and 12 months (follow up)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation and monitoring of intervention fidelity
Time Frame: End of Study (12 weeks)
This will be assessed by a member of the study team with reference to the MOSAIC materials and therapist training manual.
End of Study (12 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intermittent Claudication

Clinical Trials on Walking exercise behaviour change intervention + TENS

3
Subscribe