Proprioceptive Training Following a Wrist Fracture

November 9, 2023 updated by: Leire Cruz-Gambero, University of Malaga

Effectiveness of a Global Proprioceptive Training After Wrist Fracture

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare how a program of proprioceptive exercises for the wrist could influence in pain, functionality and quality of life in people that have suffered a wrist fracture. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Evaluate the effect of a specific proprioceptive program on pain and functionality.
  • Study the relationship between proprioception deficit and functionality.

Intervention will be:

  • Control group: participants of this group are going to receive only standard rehabilitation program after wrist fracture.
  • Experimental group: participants of this group are going to receive standard rehabilitation program after distal radius fracture and a specific proprioceptive program.

Researchers will compare control and experimental group to see if a implantation of a proprioceptive program for the wrist has benefits on pain, function and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is one of the most frequent injuries in the upper limb, corresponding to 1/6 of the total fractures of the body. It appears mostly in >50 years old women (due to osteoporosis and menopause) but it is also frequent in middle age men as a consequence of a big trauma during sport activities or working. This injury can be treated conservative of surgically, but regardless of the treatment, it always has a period of immobilization between 3 and 6 weeks.

The term "proprioception" was firstly described by Sherrington in 1906 as "perception" of body position and movement. The presence and quantity of mechanoreceptors in the joint determine its proprioceptive capacity. In the 1990s, the presence of mechanoreceptors on the wrist was described, and subsequent studies allowed us to determine that the dorsal and ulnar ligaments of the wrist have a rich innervation of mechanoreceptors. With these findings, we can hypothesize various clinical applications, both for working on wrist proprioception in the early stages of proprioceptive reeducation without risking tissue damage and for neuromuscular work after fracture consolidation, with the goal of regaining fluid and balanced movement. Previous studies on the ankle, knee, and shoulder have shown that the implementation of a proprioceptive program in the rehabilitation process can improve traumatic instability and pain. Given that the wrist shares similarities with these joints in terms of proprioceptive innervation, we can hypothesize that a specific proprioceptive exercise program for the wrist may be beneficial in the recovery after a wrist fracture.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (equal or more than 18 y/o).
  • Suffering a wrist fracture and have passed immobilization period.
  • Agree and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not had suffered a wrist fracture, being in the immobilization period or not authorized by his/her orthopedic surgeon to start with rehabilitation.
  • Suffer any mental, cognitive, neurological or musculoskeletal disorder.
  • Previous injury or pathology of the upper limb affected.
  • Previos surgery on the upper limb affected.
  • Have cervical pathology/impairment.
  • Suffering from blindness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Patients that had suffered a wrist fracture and are going to receive standard rehabilitation for the wrist.
Experimental: Experimental group
Patients that had suffered a wrist fracture and are going to receive standard rehabilitation for the wrist.
Specific proprioceptive exercises for the wrist that the patient has to do currently with standard rehabilitation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in function related with daily living activities
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.
Measured with QuickDASH. 11 items, 0=no disability and 100= total disability
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.
Change in perception of pain, referred to wrist
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
Pain measured with Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 0= no pain and 10=worst pain
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
Change in hand and wrist function related with difficulties in performing daily living activities
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
Measured with Patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE). 15 items in 2 subscales, function (10 items) and pain (5 items). Punctuation could be from 0 to 50 in each subscale, where 50 points means worse pain/function.
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in range of motion of the wrist
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.
Active range of motion of the wrist in all planes of motion. Assessed with a goniometer.
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.
Change in strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.
GRIP force. Assessed with a Jamar Dynamometer.
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months.
Change in Perception of Quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
EuroQol-5D. It has 5 dimensions, mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain and anxiety and depression. Patient determines the level of agreement with the affirmations (3 options).
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
Changes in proprioception, position terms
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
Measured with Joint Position Sense Test (JPST).
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
Changes in proprioception, strength terms
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
Measured with Force Sense Test
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RaqCan342

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Proprioceptive exercises

3
Subscribe