Digital Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery

December 1, 2025 updated by: Alec Snow, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust

Digital Prehabilitation for Patients Undergoing Major Elective Surgery: a Single-arm Pilot Study

Prehabilitation describes the process of improving someone's functional capacity before major surgery. Prehabilitation commonly focuses on exercise training, as fitness level is a predictor of surgical outcomes - the fitter you are before surgery, the lower the risk of complications after surgery. Typically, exercise training is done at the hospital, but research shows that patients would prefer to do prehabilitation exercises in their home.

The goal of this study is to test the feasibility of an online prehabilitation programme made by PreActiv, which can be accessed at home via a website by patients who are awaiting major surgery. PreActiv's prehabilitation programme is six weeks long, and involves three 35-minute exercise sessions per week, with each session including a warm-up, cardio exercises, muscle strengthening exercises, and breathing exercises. Information from this pilot study on the number of exercise sessions attended (adherence) and the number of patients who complete the study (retention) will be used to decide whether we should progress to a larger study that assesses the effectiveness of PreActiv's prehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a single-arm pilot study to assess the feasibility of PreActiv's digital prehabilitation alongside usual care at the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust. The novel provision of tailored, progressive, dynamic, evidence-based, and home-based prehabilitation via PreActiv's digital platform requires evaluation for feasibility, prior to a larger, randomised-controlled trial assessing efficacy. Such research is warranted, as patients indicate a preference to complete prehabilitation at home, rather than at the hospital, but current home-based prehabilitation programmes are one-size-fits-all, and do not adapt to changes in fitness level.

Patients awaiting major surgery and aged 50 years or older will be identified by preoperative nurses and screened by a member of the research team at the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust. Eligible patients who provide written informed consent will then be invited to attend a measurement visit at the University of Bath for baseline assessments of fitness, blood pressure, physical activity level, and wellbeing in week 0. All participants will then enrol onto PreActiv's website, and a six-week, thrice weekly prehabilitation programme will be created for them based on their mobility and fitness level. Measurements at the University of Bath will be repeated in week 7 to assess the preliminary efficacy of PreActiv's digital prehabilitation.

Feasibility outcomes will be used to inform the design of a potential future randomised-controlled trial measuring change to cardiorespiratory fitness as the primary outcome. The decision to progress to a randomised-controlled trial will be based on pre-defined progression criteria for adherence and retention in this pilot study. In addition, participant feedback will be used to refine the study design and intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Somerset
      • Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom, BA2 7AY
        • University of Bath
      • Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom, BA1 3NG
        • Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Planned for major elective surgery ≥10 weeks from time of recruitment Major or complex surgery examples in NICE guideline NG45 'Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery' provides appropriate examples that are relevant to the patient cohort at the Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust (RUH). We have extrapolated from these examples a list of surgical procedures that qualify as major or complex surgery and are carried out at the RUH. This list is not exhaustive but provides a range of procedures that are applicable for example: laparotomy, joint replacement, total abdominal hysterectomy, nephrectomy, neck dissection, parotidectomy, endoscopic resection of prostate, thyroidectomy.
  • Aged ≥50 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Surgery scheduled in <10 weeks
  • Any relative or absolute contraindications to undertake an exercise test as described by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM, 2022) and the American Heart Association (Fletcher et al., 2013)
  • Unsuitable to increase physical activity level as determined by Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q)
  • Uncontrolled or poorly-controlled lung condition, diabetes, or seizures
  • Recent (<12 months) cardiovascular events needing hospital admission
  • Ongoing infection or wound making this programme hazardous for the patient
  • Unable to access technology required to use the PreActiv digital platform
  • Currently meeting World Health Organisation (WHO) physical activity guidelines of 75- 300 minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity per week, plus twice-weekly muscle strengthening activities
  • Unable to understand explanations and/or provide informed consent
  • Unable to understand written or spoken English, and without ongoing access to an interpreter
  • Any condition and/or behaviour that would pose undue personal risk or introduce bias into the study
  • Currently enrolled in another research trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Six weeks of digital prehabilitation
The digital prehabilitation programme comprises three 35-minute exercise sessions per week, including a warm-up, vigorous intensity aerobic and resistance exercises, and breathing exercises. The digital prehabilitation programme will be tailored to the participant's mobility level and fitness level, which will be assessed via in-platform questionnaires and functional assessments. Functional assessments will be repeated every two weeks to adapt the prehabilitation programme according to changes in fitness level. Within PreActiv's website, participants will be enrolled into a managed community forum of patients and healthcare professionals where they can post their achievements and questions. Alongside access to PreActiv's digital prehabilitation, patients will be given educational materials that summarise the benefits of prehabilitation and how to realise them.
All participants will be allocated to receive six weeks of digital prehabilitation via PreActiv's website, plus usual care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Recruited
Time Frame: 4 months
The number of patients invited that provide written informed consent, with percentage calculated
4 months
Number of Participants Interested in Participating
Time Frame: 4 months
The number of patients invited that are willing to be screened for eligibility, with percentage calculated
4 months
Number of Participants That Passed Screening
Time Frame: 4 months
The number of willing patients that pass screening for eligibility, with percentage calculated
4 months
Number of Adherent Participants
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The number of participants who complete all exercise sessions, with percentage calculated
6 weeks
Percentage of Compliant Exercise Sessions
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The percentage of exercise sessions that are completed as prescribed in terms of intensity, duration, and type of exercise
6 weeks
Number of Participants Retained
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The number of patients that enrol into the study who complete follow-up measurements, with percentage calculated
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Assessed via a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test performed on a cycle ergometer, with measurements of VO2peak (ml/kg/min) and ventilatory threshold (ml/kg/min) derived.
Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Resting Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Three measurements were made after 15 minutes seated rest using an automated sphygmomanometer, with the average (mean) of the three measurements reported (mmHg)
Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Resting Heart Rate
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Three measurements were made after 15 minutes seated rest using an automated sphygmomanometer, with the average (mean) of the three measurements reported (bpm)
Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Physical Activity Level
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Assessed via International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short-form. After data processing, the highest possible score is 25,704 MET-minutes/week and the lowest possible score is 0 MET-minutes/week. A higher score is favourable as it indicates a higher physical activity level.
Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Anxiety and Depression
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Assessed via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The highest possible score is 21 and the lowest possible score is 0 for both the anxiety and depression sub-scores. A lower score is favourable as it indicates lower anxiety/depression.
Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Quality of Life EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
Assessed via EuroQol EQ-5D visual analogue scale, with a highest possible score of 100 and a lowest possible score of 0. A higher score is favourable as it indicates better quality of life.
Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7)
1-minute Sit-to-stand Test
Time Frame: Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7).
Assessed via the number of repetitions completed during a 1-minute sit-to-stand test.
Change from pre-intervention (week 0) to post-intervention (week 7).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Carbon Emissions Avoided With Home-based vs. Face-to-face Prehabilitation
Time Frame: 6 weeks
An estimation of the carbon emissions avoided by performing prehabilitation at home via PreActiv's digital prehabilitation compared to the estimated hypothetical emissions associated with participants travelling to the hospital three times per week for six weeks for face-to-face prehabilitation. Publicly-available carbon emissions data will be used for calculations.
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alec Snow, MBChB, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 17, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 333460

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Six weeks of digital prehabilitation

Subscribe