Regression of Cervical Precancerous Lesions and Associated Risk Factors (RECER)

November 24, 2023 updated by: David Cibula, General University Hospital, Prague
The aim of this study is to assess the extent of histopathological regression of severe cervical precancerous lesions (CIN 2 and CIN 3); evaluate the proportion of patients who experience the normalization of HPV test and cytology finding among those who were treated conservatively and those who underwent conization; and identify predictive parameters associated with regression. Based on this analysis, a model will be proposed to predict the likelihood of lesion regression.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction There are three grades of dysplasia of the cervix based on their severity (CIN 1-3). Most women with CIN 2 or CIN 3 (high-grade - HG lesions) are referred for conization due to the presumed risk of developing invasive cervical cancer. However, this surgical intervention is associated with an increased risk of preterm labor in the future.

From the literature, it is evident that 30% - 60% of CIN 2 and CIN 3 lesions spontaneously regress. Colposcopic examination is a tool that can accurately assess the severity of the lesion and safely evaluate the dynamics of its development. It can be used to exclude the presence of invasive cervical cancer.

The aim of the study is to determine the absolute rate of spontaneous regression of HG lesions, considering stratification factors.

Methods Patients meeting all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria are included (see below). Colposcopic evaluations occur at four-month intervals during the study. In case of progression, the patient is indicated for conization; in case of persistence, the patient is consulted and can choose further observation or conization; in case of regression, punch biopsy is performed to acquire a histopathologic sample for primary endpoint evaluation. The biopsy/conization result is subsequently compared with the initial sample to declare regression or persistence of the HG lesion.

The HPV status and cytological findings are evaluated similarly. Stratification criteria such as age, colposcopic characteristics, HPV genotype (Cobas 4800, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, USA), methylation markers (GynTect®, Oncgnostics GmbH, Löbstedter Str. 41, 07749 Jena, Germany), semiquantitative microscopic assessment of the vaginal swab, and personal history are assessed during monitoring.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Prague, Czechia, 12800
        • Recruiting
        • General University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive participant sampling of patients with bioptically-verified CIN 2 or CIN 3 and fully visualised squamocolumnar junction with no suspiction on invasive cancer or glandular lesion.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. squamocolumnar junction fully visualized
  2. bioptically verified CIN 2 or CIN 3
  3. age ≥ 18 years
  4. age ≤ 40 years
  5. informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. squamocolumnar junction not fully visualized
  2. suspicion on glandular lesion
  3. suspicion on invasive cancer
  4. personal history of CIN 2, 3 or cerv. cancer
  5. gravidity
  6. HIV positivity
  7. immunosuppression
  8. impossible photographic documentation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CIN 2, CIN 3
Bioptically verified CIN 2 or CIN 3 lesion
No surgery, observation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regression-rate of severe cervical precancerous lesions (CIN 2 and CIN 3) expressed through a comparison of initial and final histology
Time Frame: 3 years
Histological results from the initial visit will be compared with the biopsy obtained during the last visit (or the specimen from conization) to determine whether regression or persistence of the high-grade lesion has occurred.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of HPV negativization in patients with spontaneous regression compared to patients with persistence after conization
Time Frame: 3 years
The proportion of patients with a negative result on the HPV DNA test obtained during the final visit will be assessed.
3 years
Rate of cytological normalization in patients with spontaneous regression compared to patients with persistence after conization
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Regression-rate considering specified stratification factors
Time Frame: 3 years

Specific factors will be evaluated to determine their influence on the regression or persistence of the cervical high-grade lesion. The following factors will be assessed:

  • CIN Grade (CIN 2 / CIN 3)
  • Immunohistochemically detected biomarkers
  • p16INK4a
  • Ki-67
  • E4
  • Gene methylation (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671)
  • Histologically described cervicitis
  • Colposcopic Markers
  • Microbiological Markers
  • Selective HPV genotyping
  • Viral load
  • Anamnestic Data
  • Smoking
  • Age
3 years
Development of a model for predicting spontaneous regression
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HPV

Clinical Trials on Colposcopy

3
Subscribe