Laminaria Tents Versus Vaginal Prostaglandin in Cervical Ripening

November 21, 2023 updated by: Ain Shams University

Laminaria Tents Versus Vaginal Prostaglandin in Cervical Ripening in Term Induction of Labor With Unfavorable Cervix:A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mechanical methods used for induction of labor received a great attention nowadays due to the serious side effects of the pharmacological methods. Hygroscopic dilators are considered important subtype of these mechanical methods. One of them is Laminaria which is a synthetic type of sea algae that induces cervical dilation by absorbing water from the cervix and gradually increasing in thickness. The current study will compare the effectiveness and safety of laminiria and vaginal prostaglandins in induction of labor in women with unfavorable cervix.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A new method for induction of labor to be studied

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Ain Shams University Faculty Of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women with:

    • Age 18-45 years.
    • Live fetus with cephalic presentation.
    • Normal non-stress test with reassuring features (baseline heart rate 110-160 beats/min, baseline variability 5-25 beats/minute, and no decelerations) (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2017).
    • Gestational age of 37 weeks or more (Middleton et al. 2020).
    • Fetal weight less than 4 kilograms.
    • Bishop score less than 6 (Navve et al. 2017).
    • No labor pains.
    • No contraindications for vaginal delivery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • o Presence of fetal distress.

    • Presence of thick meconium-stained amniotic fluid
    • Presence of fever, chorioamnionitis, or vaginal bleeding before intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Laminaria tents group
Laminaria tent used to be inserted in cervix and left for 6-12 hours
mechanical method for induction of labor
Vaginal prostaglandin for ripening
Other Names:
  • Vagiprost
Placebo Comparator: vaginal prostaglandin group
Misoprostol 25 mcg inserted for one or multiple doses
mechanical method for induction of labor
Vaginal prostaglandin for ripening
Other Names:
  • Vagiprost

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
o Bishop Score and cervical dilatation
Time Frame: 2 YEARS
Tool to assess cervical status
2 YEARS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
o Induction time to active phase of labor.
Time Frame: 2 YEARS
Time between start and 5cm dilatation
2 YEARS
o Induction time to delivery time.
Time Frame: 2 YEARS
Time between start to delivery
2 YEARS

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
o Cesarean frequency rate
Time Frame: 2 YEARS
Number of needed cs
2 YEARS
o Intrapartum complications
Time Frame: 2 YEARS
Any complicated case
2 YEARS

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maya AbdelRazek, MD, Lecturer of obstetrics and gynecology - Ain Shams University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMASU M D 63/2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

It will be available once approved

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within one month from now

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open access

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labor Onset and Length Abnormalities

Clinical Trials on Laminaria

3
Subscribe