Prospective Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy for eXtra-Large Ischemic Stroke (XL-STROKE)

December 24, 2025 updated by: Zhongming Qiu

XL STROKE: A Nationwide Prospective Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Extra-large Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion

Since 2015, many randomized trials have shown that endovascular thrombectomy improve functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Recently, five randomized controlled trials (ANGEL-ASPECT [Endovascular Therapy in Acute Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusive Patients with a Large Infarct Core], LASTE [LArge Stroke Therapy Evaluation], RESCUE-Japan LIMIT [The Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-Acute Embolism-Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial], SELECT 2 [Randomized Controlled Trial to Optimize Patient's Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke], and TENSION [The Efficacy and Safety of Thrombectomy in Stroke with extended lesion and extended time window]) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of thrombectomy for large infarct patients (defined as Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score [ASPECTS] ≥3 or infarct core <100ml). Patients with extra-large infarct core (ASPECTS score of 2 or less) were excluded from these trials. Therefore, the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with extra-large ischemic burden has not been well studied. The XL STROKE registry is aiming to investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in acute extra-large ischemic stroke.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Hunan
      • Xiangtan, Hunan, China, 421001
        • Recruiting
        • Xiangtan Central Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients are presented with acute extra-large stroke and large vessel occlusion within 24 hours of time from last known well.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years;
  2. Presenting with acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours of time from last known well;
  3. The patient or patient's representative signs a written informed consent form before enrollment.

Neuroimaging inclusion criteria

  1. Occlusion of internal carotid artery, or the middle cerebral artery M1 or M2 segments confirmed by computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography;
  2. The baseline ASPECTS is 0 to 2 based on NCCT or diffusion weighted imaging, or cerebral extra-large ischemic core volume ≥85ml (defined as relative cerebral blood flow <30% on CT perfusion or an apparent diffusion coefficient <620×10^-6 mm2/s on MRI).

Exclusion criteria

  1. CT or MRI evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage;
  2. Evidence of mass effect with ventricular effacement, midline shift or herniation on baseline imaging;
  3. Females who are pregnant, or those of childbearing, potential with positive urine or serum beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin test;
  4. Previous bleeding disorders, severe heart, liver or kidney disease, or sepsis;
  5. Any terminal illness with life expectancy less than 6 months;
  6. Participation in other clinical treatment trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Endovascular thrombectomy
Patients in this group will be treated with medical management plus endovascular thrombectomy
Medical management will be based on the recommendations of the stroke management guidelines of the Chinese Stroke Association. Patients will receive intravenous thrombolysis according to the guidelines if they are eligible for thrombolysis. Patients who are not treated with intravenous thrombolysis will be treated with aspirin, unless an indication for early anticoagulation is present.
The use of devices (i.e. stent-retriever, aspiration catheter) is at the discretion of neurointerventionalist. Intra-arterial administration of alteplase, tenecteplase, tirofiban, angioplasty and stenting will also be permitted.
Medical management
Patients in this group will be treated with guideline-based medical management alone
Medical management will be based on the recommendations of the stroke management guidelines of the Chinese Stroke Association. Patients will receive intravenous thrombolysis according to the guidelines if they are eligible for thrombolysis. Patients who are not treated with intravenous thrombolysis will be treated with aspirin, unless an indication for early anticoagulation is present.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale score
Time Frame: 90±14 days after enrollment
The primary outcome of this study is level of disability assessed by the score on the modified Rankin Scale at 90±14 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability, 5 severe disability, and 6 death; mRS 6 and 5 will be merged as the worst outcome level to avoid a shift of 6 to 5 to be seen as better outcome).
90±14 days after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Independent ambulation
Time Frame: 90±14 days after enrollment
Score of 0-3 on the modified Rankin scale
90±14 days after enrollment
Not ambulatory nor capable of body self-care
Time Frame: 90±14 days after enrollment
Score of 0-4 on the modified Rankin scale
90±14 days after enrollment
Functional independence
Time Frame: 90±14 days after enrollment
Score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin scale
90±14 days after enrollment
Excellent outcome
Time Frame: 90±14 days after enrollment
Score of 0-1 on the modified Rankin scale
90±14 days after enrollment
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score
Time Frame: 5-7 days after enrollment or discharge (whichever occurred first)
Scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating worse neurologic deficits.
5-7 days after enrollment or discharge (whichever occurred first)
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 90±14 days after enrollment
Health-related quality of life [European Quality Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) scale score]
90±14 days after enrollment
Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: 48 hours after enrollment
Use Heidelberg criteria to assess symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage.
48 hours after enrollment
Incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage
Time Frame: 48 hours after enrollment
Any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours
48 hours after enrollment
Incidence of decompressive hemicraniectomy
Time Frame: 7 days after enrollment
Decompressive hemicraniectomy during hospitalization
7 days after enrollment
Mortality during hospitalization
Time Frame: 7 days after enrollment
Death from any cause
7 days after enrollment
Mortality
Time Frame: 90±14 days after enrollment
Death from any cause
90±14 days after enrollment
The occurrence of non-hemorrhagic serious adverse events
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 90 days
The occurrence of non-hemorrhagic serious adverse events, such as pneumonia, respiratory failure, circulatory failure, cerebral herniation, acute coronary syndrome, venous thrombosis.
through study completion, an average of 90 days
Mortality within 1 year
Time Frame: One year after enrollment
Death from any cause
One year after enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale score at 1 year
Time Frame: One year after enrollment
The score on the Modified Rankin Scale
One year after enrollment
Not ambulatory nor capable of body self-care
Time Frame: One year after enrollment
Score of 0-4 on the modified Rankin scale
One year after enrollment
Independent ambulation
Time Frame: One year after enrollment
Score of 0-3 on the modified Rankin scale
One year after enrollment
Functional independence
Time Frame: One year after enrollment
Score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin scale
One year after enrollment
Excellent outcome
Time Frame: One year after enrollment
Score of 0-1 on the modified Rankin scale
One year after enrollment
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: One year after enrollment
Health-related quality of life [European Quality Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) scale score]
One year after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guangxiong Yuan, Xiangtan Central Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study Protocol, Clinical Study Report, and Analytic Code will be shared after approval of a proposal from principal investigator 3 years after the trial results are revealed.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

3 years after the trial results are revealed

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After approval of a proposal from principal investigator

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischemic Stroke From Large Vessel Occlusion

Clinical Trials on medical management

Subscribe