ISTH/ANRS 0409s INTEGRATE Lassa Fever Study

January 8, 2024 updated by: Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital

Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of New or Repurposed Drugs Against Lassa Fever in West African Countries

Lassa fever (LF) is a viral haemorrhagic fever responsible of 5000 deaths per year in West Africa, with in-hospital mortality at 12%. Transmission to humans occurs mainly via direct or indirect exposure to excreta from the rodent reservoir, mainly made up of Mastomys natalensis . Less frequently, LASV may also be transmitted from human to human and cause nosocomial outbreaks. Ribavirin is the only treatment available with worrying toxicity, questionable efficacy and low access because of its high cost. Consequently, there is an urgent need for new drugs to treat LF patients. The Research and Development (R&D) Blueprint of the World Health Organization (WHO) has included LF in the list of priority diseases for urgent research and development.

The INTEGRATE consortium is an unprecedented international collaboration on Lassa fever of 15 partners from 10 countries across West Africa, Europe and North America and across several disciplines (epidemiological researchers, social scientists, medical health facility professionals, humanitarian actors, etc.).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The INTEGRATE study is a platform, multinational, multicentre, sequential, seamless phase II-III, controlled, randomised, superiority trial in open-label parallel arms. Three arms will be assessed and compared to the SCD. Its primary objective is to compare the efficacy of each Investigational Medical Product (IMP) to Standard of Care Drug (SCD) to prevent death or organ failure in hospitalized patients with confirmed LF. Secondary objectives will be i) to compare the safety and tolerability of each IMP and SCD, ii) to compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD on clinical, virological and biological parameters, iii) to describe the pharmacokinetics of each IMP and iv) to develop a pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics model for each IMP informing about optimal dosing regimens and dose-response relationship.

  1. Objectives

    1.1 Primary objective The primary objective of the trial is to compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD to prevent death or organ failure in hospitalized participants with confirmed LF.

    1.2. Secondary objectives

    • To compare the safety and tolerability of each IMP and SCD
    • To compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD on clinical, virological and biological parameters
    • To describe the pharmacokinetics of each IMP
    • To develop a pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics model for each IMP informing about optimal dosing regimens and dose-response relationship
  2. Design

    • Phase II: comparative controlled design
    • Phase III: Whitehead's sequential double triangular design
  3. Sample size:

    In the current version of the protocol (if all sub-protocols start at once):

    • 3 IMPs go into phase III: N= 732
    • 2 IMPs go into phase III: N= 585
    • 1 IMP go into phase III: N= 438
  4. Duration

    • Hospitalization: 10 days
    • Follow-up: 28 days

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1755

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

  1. General

    Inclusion criteria

    • Clinical disease with signs and symptoms suggestive for LF
    • Positive plasma LASV RT-PCR
    • Participant requires hospitalization per the local guidelines
    • Participant or their legally authorized representative is able and willing to sign the informed consent

    Exclusion criteria

    • Unwilling to provide informed consent

    • Positive pregnancy test

    • Unwilling to provide informed consent
    • History of allergic reaction or other contra-indication to ribavirin according to the Reference safety document
    • Received drug therapy for Lassa fever (excluding supportive care) prior to inclusion
    • Has received a vaccine against LF
  2. Sub-protocols

    2.1 Favipiravir high dose sub-protocol

    Inclusion criteria

    • Age ≥ 18 years old

    Exclusion criteria

    • Pregnancy (evidenced by positive urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential)

    • Treatment contraindicated with favipiravir according to the Reference safety document

    • Pre-existing liver failure

    • Severe symptomatic gout/hyperuricemia
    • History of QT prolongation or arrhythmia or other cardiac disorders
    • PR interval ≥ 200 ms
    • Hypersensitivity to excipients
    • Inability to take oral drug (e.g. encephalopathy, severe vomiting)

    2.2. Favipiravir-Ribavirin sub-protocol

    Inclusion criteria

    • Age ≥ 18 years old

    Exclusion criteria

    • Pregnancy (evidenced by positive urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential)

    • Treatment contraindicated with favipiravir according to the Reference safety document

    • Pre-existing liver failure

    • Severe symptomatic gout/hyperuricemia

    • History of QT prolongation or arrhythmia or other cardiac disorders

    • PR interval ≥ 200 ms

    • Hypersensitivity to excipients

    • Inability to take oral drug (e.g. encephalopathy, severe vomiting)

    2.3. Dexamethasone sub-protocol

    Inclusion criteria

    • Age ≥ 12 years old

    Exclusion criteria

    • Pregnancy (evidenced by positive urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential)
    • Known intolerance and contra-indications to ribavirin or dexamethasone
    • Patients who already received a corticosteroid within the preceding 7 days

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Favipiravir 1600
Oral favipiravir: 2400 mg BID D1; 1600 mg BID D2-D10
Control arm
Other Names:
  • Standard of care
Active Comparator: Ribavirin
Intravenous ribavirin (Irrua regimen - 100 mg/kg Day 1 (dose is divided: 2/3 stat, 1/3 8 hours later, maximum dose is 7g/day) then 25 mg/kg single dose days 2-7, 12.5 mg/kg single dose days 8-10).
Interventional Medicinal Product (IMP)
Experimental: Favipiravir 1200 + ribavirin
Oral favipiravir: 2400 mg BID D1; 1200 mg BID D2-D10 Intravenous ribavirin (Irrua regimen - 100 mg/kg Day 1 (dose is divided: 2/3 stat, 1/3 8 hours later, maximum dose is 7g/day) then 25 mg/kg single dose days 2-7, 12.5 mg/kg single dose days 8-10).
Control arm
Other Names:
  • Standard of care
Interventional Medicinal Product (IMP)
Experimental: Ribavirin + dexamethasone
IV ribavirin, Irrua regimen IV or oral dexamethasone 6mg/day (For the first 48 hours, dexamethasone will be given intravenously (i. Afterwards, a switch to oral dexamethasone (same dosage) is permitted at the discretion of the study physician.)
Control arm
Other Names:
  • Standard of care
Interventional Medicinal Product (IMP)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Death
Time Frame: Day 28

Proportion of participants death definition by Y/N measure

Clinical aggravation is defined as the first occurrence of one of the following conditions, at any time point between baseline and Day 14 (included):

Death, or

Increase (+1 or +2) in the number (0, 1 or 2) of organ failures among:

Renal failure: KDIGO stage 3 Respiratory failure: SpO2/FiO2* ≤ 315 Cardiovascular failure: MBP** < 65 mmHg or SBP < 90 mmHg (measured twice with a time interval of 10 min) and lactate > 2 mmol/L Analysis per component Proportion of participants with a newly occurring component of the composite primary endpoint between Day 0 and Day 14.

Sensitivity analyses Proportion of participants presenting no clinical aggravation between baseline and Day 14, with varying thresholds on the definitions of organ failures or adding different organ failures definition (e.g. neurologic, hepatic, hematologic, etc.).

Day 28
New onset of acute kidney failure
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

Proportion of participants a new onset of acute kidney failure . Definition by KDIGO 3 measure. 3.0 times baseline, OR increase in serum creatinine to ≥4.0 mg/dl (≥353.6 mmol/l).

The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0

Between Day 0 and Day 10
New onset of acute respiratory failure
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants a new onset of acute respiratory failure. Definition by SpO2/FiO2 ≤ 315 measure The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0
Between Day 0 and Day 10
New onset of shock
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants a New onset of shock. Mean Blood Pressure (MBP) < 65 mmHg or Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg (measured twice with a time interval of 10 min) and lactate > 2 mmol/L measured at the same time The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0
Between Day 0 and Day 10

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of each IMP and SCD
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

Proportion (events and participants with at least one event) of:

  • Adverse Event* grade 3 and higher
  • Serious Adverse Event
  • Adverse Event of Special Interest
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Safety of each IMP and SCD
Time Frame: Day 0, Day 28

Proportion (events and participants with at least one event) of:

Adverse Event* grade 3 and higher

  • Serious Adverse Event
  • Adverse Event of Special Interest
Day 0, Day 28
Organ failure from composite primary endpoint
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants with a newly occurring component of the composite primary endpoint
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Acute Kidney Injury
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants meeting KDIGO ≥ 2 or initiation of renal replacement therapy parameters
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Encephalopathy
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants with CVPU or seizure
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Bleeding
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants meeting WHO bleeding scale grade 2 or above
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Severe anaemia
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants with Hb level < 80 g/L
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Liver failure
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants with AST or ALT ≥ 3 N
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Clinical severity score
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants with a NEWS2 score > 7
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Intensive care strategies - oxygen therapy
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants having received oxygen therapy
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Intensive care strategies - RRT
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants having received RRT
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Intensive care strategies - blood transfusion
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants having received blood transfusion
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Intensive care strategies- inotropes
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Proportion of participants having received inotropes
Between Day 0 and Day 10
the viral clearance - Change in LF RT-PCR Ct
Time Frame: Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, Day 9
value (for each target gene) from D0
Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, Day 9
the viral clearance - Change in LASV viral
Time Frame: Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, Day 9
titer from D0
Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, Day 9
viral clearance - LASV RT-PCR
Time Frame: Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, Day 9
<LLQ
Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, Day 9
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
• Peak concentration (Cmax)
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
• Time to peak concentration (Tmax)
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
• Area under the curve
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
• Half-life
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
• Clearance
Between Day 0 and Day 10
Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
• Volume(s) of distribution
Between Day 0 and Day 10
PK/PD (phase II only)
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
• Prediction of initial viral load and slope of decline
Between Day 0 and Day 10
PK/PD (phase II only)
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
• Optimal dosing regimen with PK/PD modelling
Between Day 0 and Day 10

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Viral resistance parameters
Time Frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10
Frequency of LASV resistance mutations
Between Day 0 and Day 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marie MD JASPARD, MD, ALIMA - The Alliance for International Medical Action - Paris, France
  • Principal Investigator: Sylvanus OKOGBENIN, MD, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital Irrua - Edo State, Nigeria
  • Study Chair: Michael RAMHARTER, MD, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Bernhard-Nocht-Hamburg, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lassa Fever

Clinical Trials on Ribavirin

3
Subscribe