Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve and Recurrence Rate After DWLS Diode Laser OMA Vaporization (OMAlaser)

January 18, 2024 updated by: Stefano Angioni, University of Cagliari

Ovarian Reserve, Recurrence Rate and Histopathologic Evaluation After DWLS Diode Laser Vaporization of Ovarian Endometriomas: Results From a Prospective, Multicentre, Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Dual Wavelength Laser System (DWLS) diode laser on the treatment of endometrioma (OMA), with ablation and vaporization of the cystic capsule without performing the stripping technique, in terms of ovarian reserve and recurrence rate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND Endometriosis cyst, or endometrioma (OMA), is one of the most frequent gynaecological pathologies and is commonly associated with symptoms such as infertility and chronic pelvic pain. Randomized and meta-analysis studies demonstrate how the most effective surgery, in terms of percentages of pregnancy after surgery and minor rates of recurrence of cysts or pelvic pain, is the complete removal of the cyst wall through laparoscopic "stripping". However, data has recently emerged on the possible damage determined by "stripping" surgery on the healthy ovarian tissue adjacent to the OMA.

Studies on the anatomopathological characteristics of the wall of the OMA surgically removed have shown that, with the complete removal surgery, part of ovarian tissue is inadvertently removed together with the OMA wall in almost all cases since there is no real cleavage plan between cysts and healthy ovarian tissue. The post-surgery ovarian reserve has been reported, measured as lower levels of antimullerian hormone (AMH), minor values of antral follicular count (AFC), and reduced postoperative ovarian volumes. Worst performances have also been reported for the induction of ovulation for in vitro fertilization techniques. In the event of the removal of bilateral OMA, 2-4% of early premature ovarian failure has been reported, confirming possible surgical damage to healthy ovarian tissue. Following these data, the international scientific community has begun to question the effective superiority of the complete removal approach of the cystic wall, or "stripping", given these new acquisitions on post-surgical ovarian damage. Therefore, the theme of the best therapeutic approach to OMA has become one of the most debated in the gynaecological field. Despite the data on the possible surgical damage, surgical intervention remains one of the cornerstones of OMA therapy.

The recurrence rate evaluation is one of the primary endpoints of all OMA surgery studies. Guo S.w. has estimated a recurrence rate of 21.5% to 2 years and 40-50% to 5 years. In a recent systematic review of Ceccaroni M. et al., 12-30% recurrence rates are shown 2-5 years after surgical treatment.

An alternative technique to "stripping" is the fenestration of the cyst followed by ablation or vaporization with the laser of the internal wall of the cyst left "in situ" without the complete removal of the cystic wall with healthy ovarian tissue. Candiani et al. demonstrated, in their randomized study, that the "One Step" vaporization of the OMA capsule with the CO2 laser is more effective than stripping in reducing the residual follicular damage (in terms of AMH and AFC).

For better results regarding controlled ablation of the cystic wall of the OMA, the DWLS diode laser could be helpful. The combination of two wavelengths, 980 Nm and 1470 Nm, gives a contemporary absorption in H2O and haemoglobin with an excellent ability of hemostasis, cut and vaporization, as previously demonstrated in laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the DWLS diode laser on the treatment of OMA, with ablation and vaporization of the cystic capsule without performing the stripping technique, in terms of ovarian reserve, recurrence rate and patient's symptoms.

Primary objective Evaluation of the ovarian reserve regarding AFC, AMH and the patient's symptoms.

Secondary objective Evaluation of OMA recurrence rates on the treated ovary and pregnancy rate of the patients operated on.

EXPECTED BENEFITS Compared to the stripping technique with complete removal of the cystic wall, this approach could make the treatment easier and faster but, above all, less harmful for the healthy ovarian parenchyma below the cyst.

Compared to the one-step technique with CO2 laser, the combination of the two wavelengths of diode lasers would allow a more controlled ablation of the endometriosis tissue for its well-known characteristics of hemostasis and vaporization even in the most bloody tissues e irrigated by physiological solution.

INTERVENTION STRATEGY AND INSTRUMENTS The investigators plan to recruit 70 patients of reproductive age with mono of bilateral OMA with a diameter ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 cm associated with infertility or pelvic pain who have never carried out previous interventions on one or both annexes. The cyst diameter cut-offs were chosen according to the previous data present in the literature and guidelines for the management of OMA. The patients will be evaluated at the endometriosis/chronic pelvic pain centre of the gynaecology unit of the University Hospital of Monserrato (Cagliari) and in the other centres involved in the study. All patients will perform a visit, a transvaginal ultrasound and where magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis is necessary to provide accurate information on the location of the endometriosis pathology and to exclude other coexisting uterine or annexial diseases.

All surgical procedures will be performed in operating laparoscopy under general anaesthesia.

In all patients, the diagnosis of OMA will be confirmed by surgical exploration and histopathological examination.

During the surgery, the DWLS diose laser will be used to vaporise the endometrioma capsule after opening, aspiration of the liquid and subversion of the internal wall of the cyst. Before using the laser, an accurate exploration of the cyst capsule and a biopsy on it will be performed. The removed samples will be sent for histological examination by requiring the measurement of the thickness of the endometriosis capsule. After surgery, all patients will be followed over time at quarterly intervals in the first year. At each follow-up visit, the presence of pain symptoms will be checked (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, dyschezia, dysuria) in patients operated for pelvic pain and the presence of pregnancy in patients operated by infertility to evaluate the cure or recurrence rates of the symptoms.

Transvaginal ultrasounds will be performed on each control for the evaluation of the presence or absence of a recurrence of OMA. The cyst must have a diameter of at least 2 cm to satisfy the ultrasound criteria for the recurrence of OMA, and it must persist over time (for at least two consecutive menstrual cycles) to be distinguished as a functional cyst.

The AFC will also be assessed During the ultrasound examination between the second and seventh day of the cycle. The AMH will systematically be evaluated for the measurement of the ovarian reserve.

During the first visit, it will be detected:

  • Clinical and surgical history
  • Full target examination
  • Gynecological examination
  • Concomitant drugs and their indication
  • Pelvic and trans-vaginal ultrasounds were performed between the second and seventh day of the cycle with an evaluation of the parameters of ovarian functionality, OMA volumes, and the ovary and AFC on both ovaries.
  • Dosage of the AMH hormone

Follow up evaluation

With quarterly frequency in the first year:

  • Clinical evaluation
  • Pelvic and trans-vaginal ultrasounds were performed between the second and seventh day of the cycle to evaluate the parameters of ovarian functionality and AFC on both ovaries and possible recurrence of the OMA.
  • Dosage of the AMH hormone.

POPULATION Seventy patients aged between 18 and 40 with clinical and ultrasound diagnoses of mono or bilateral OMA cysts. To be suitable for inclusion, patients with an ultrasound diagnosis of mono or bilateral OMA should present symptoms such as pelvic pain or sterility.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The data will be tabulated on a specific database and analyzed using specific software. A descriptive output will be created, and the comparison between variables will be made through parametric and non-parametric tests with a level of significance of 95%. The IBM SPSS Statistics software will be used for statistical analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Cagliari
      • Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy, 09042
        • University of Cagliari,Obstetrics and Gynecological Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 40 years old
  • OMA mono or bilateral ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 cm in diameter
  • presence of symptoms such as pelvic pain and sterility

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable to provide written informed consent or to follow the procedures provided for by the protocol
  • Age <18 years and> 40 years
  • OMA mono or bilateral <3 and> 8 cm in diameter
  • Asymptomatic patients
  • Absence of histological confirmation of endometriosis cysts
  • previous interventions on one or both annexes
  • Failure to follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: symptomatic ovarian endometrioma
patients aged between 18 and 40 years with clinical and/or ultrasound diagnosis of symptomatic ovarian endometrioma
Procedure: laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporization
laser vaporization of ovarian endometrioma using a DWLS diode laser during a laparoscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the ovarian reserve using AntiMullerian Hormone (AMH) assessment.
Time Frame: every 3 months for one year
Blood dosage of AntiMullerian Hormone expressed in nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)
every 3 months for one year
Evaluation of the ovarian reserve using Antral follicular Count (AFC)
Time Frame: every 3 months for one year
counts of the number of antral follicles present in the ovary during ultrasound scan. The count is presented in Numbers from 0 to any numbers (n°)
every 3 months for one year
Evaluation of the patients' symptoms
Time Frame: every 3 months for one year
assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) , from 0 as the minimum to 10 as maximum value. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
every 3 months for one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of endometrioma recurrence rate
Time Frame: every 3 months for one year
Ultrasound scan Evaluation of OMA recurrence. Assessed using a percentage (%) of patients who present the endometrioma in the ovaries after surgery
every 3 months for one year
Evaluation of pregnancy rate
Time Frame: every 3 months for one year
Assessed as percentage (%) of patients who achieved pregnancy after surgery
every 3 months for one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of Cagliari

Collaborators

University of Foggia
Azienda Ospedaliera per l'Emergenza Canizzaro

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OMA Diode Laser Vaporization

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrioma

Clinical Trials on laparoscopic endometrioma laser vaporization

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in China

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe