Evaluation of The Effect of Crowns Applied With Hall Technique on Occlusion

January 28, 2024 updated by: Funda Cagırır Dindaroglu, Izmir Katip Celebi University

Evaluation of The Effect of Crowns Applied wıth Hall Technique on Occlusion: Randomized Clinical Study

This study aims to evaluate and compare the change on occlusion after placing stainless steel crowns (SCC) using Hall technique and conventional technique in children between the ages of 5-8. In addition, the investigators planned to analyze the change in oral health-related quality of life between SCC applied with the Hall technique and SCC applied with the conventional method, before and after clinical application.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

First, the participants who met the inclusion criteria were included in 2 study groups according to age, gender, dental experience, tooth number, applied stainless steel crown technique, Decayed, Missing due to caries, and Filled teeth in the permanent teeth/decayed, missing due to caries, and filled teeth in the deciduous teeth (DMFT/dmft index) values and International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II) and radiographic evaluation criteria. In the experimental group, stainless steel crowns were placed on the teeth of 39 participants using the Hall technique. In the control group, stainless steel crowns were placed on the teeth of 39 participants using conventional technique.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • İzmir, Turkey
        • Funda Çağırır Dindaroğlu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with American Society of Anesthesiologists score I (ASA I),
  • Subjects with Frankl's behavior rate III (positive) and IV (definitely positive),
  • Clinically, Black class II enamel-dentin caries in the upper jaw primary second molar is; ICDAS II Scale score 4, score 5 and the accepted values in the evaluation of radiographic dental caries are D1-RA3, D2-RB4, D3-RC5,
  • Antagonist of the tooth planned to be processed,
  • Lamina dura and periodontal space can be observed normally
  • There is permanent tooth germ underneath or the position is normal.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic to the local anesthetics or sulfites,
  • Had teeth with pain or sepsis,
  • Were uncooperative during clinical examination,
  • TMJ disorder,
  • Had parafunctional habit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional technique
In the conventional technique, after the area to be anesthetized was dried, topical anesthetic solution (Locanest 10% spray lidocaine, Avixa, Turkey) was applied to the mucosa with a cotton pellet for one minute. For infiltrative anesthesia, 4% articaine solution (Ultracaine DS Forte ampoule, Sanofi-Aventis GmbH, Germany) containing 1 ml of 1:100,000 epinephrine was applied. Preparation was made on the mesial, distal and occlusal sides of the tooth. The decay was cleaned and the cavity was filled with glass ionomer cement (Ketac Molar Easymix, 3M™ ESPE™, St. Paul, MN, USA). The stainless steel crown was bonded with glass ionomer cement (Ketac Cem Easymix, 3M™ ESPE™, St. Paul, MN, USA).
1 or 1,5 mm preparation on mesial, distal and occlusal of the tooth
Experimental: Hall technique
In the Hall technique method, an orthodontic separator was placed 2 days before the procedure to create distance for the crown in the mesial and distal contact areas of the tooth on which the crown will be placed. A stainless steel crown was cemented on the tooth with glass ionomer cement without local anesthesia, caries cleaning or any preparation. The participant was asked to close the teeth tightly for 2-3 minutes.
Prepless crown technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The measurement of intrusion of teeth with stainless steel crown applied with Hall technique using Gom Inspect
Time Frame: Immediately before the procedure and one month control
Intrusion scores in Hall technique 0-3, where 0 means no movement, 3 means intrusion
Immediately before the procedure and one month control
The measurement of intrusion of teeth with stainless steel crown applied with conventional technique using Gom Inspect
Time Frame: Immediately before the procedure and one month control
0-3, where 0 means no movement, 3 means extrusion
Immediately before the procedure and one month control
Change from measurement the distance between the cusps of canines with stainless steel crown applied with Hall technique using Exocad
Time Frame: Immediately before the procedure and one month control
0-2, where 0 means no movement, 2 means no closure
Immediately before the procedure and one month control
Change from measurement the distance between the cusps of canines with stainless steel crown applied with conventional technique using Exocad
Time Frame: Immediately before the procedure and one month control
0-2, where 0 means no movement, 2 means no closure
Immediately before the procedure and one month control

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measuring the impact of stainless steel crowns on oral health and quality of life in children section with the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure and one month control
Child sections have a possible range from 0 to 36. 0=Never or hardly ever 36= Occasionally, often, or very often
Immediately after the procedure and one month control
Measuring the impact of stainless steel crowns on oral health and quality of life in parents section with the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure and one month control
Family sections have a possible range from 0 to 16. 0=Never or hardly ever 16= Occasionally, often, or very often
Immediately after the procedure and one month control

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-TDU-DİŞF-0013

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Hall technique

3
Subscribe