Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Hall Technique and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Controlling Occlusoproximal Caries in Primary Molars in Children

Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Hall Technique and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Controlling Occlusoproximal Caries in Dentin of Primary Molars in Children : A Randomized Clinical Study

•To investigate clinical and radiographic outcomes of Hall Technique and conventional restorative care using RMGIC in occulusoproximal carious lesions of primary molars in children.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Dental caries is one of the most common preventable diseases which is recognized as the primary cause of oral pain and tooth loss. WHO claimed that poor oral health may have a profound effect on general health as well as quality of life. Dental caries is not an infectious disease that needs to be "cured" by removing bacteria or, even less so, a particular bacterial species. Instead, dental caries can be managed behaviorally by controlling its causative factors-namely, the supply of fermentable carbohydrates and the presence and maturation of bacterial dental biofilms.

Resin modified Glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) has been used as a material for placement of dental restorations and is known to release fluoride which can help to remineralize carious lesion. RMGIC has excellent compressive and tensile strength compared to water based material, very less sensitive to moisture during initial setting time, excellent bonding with tooth, long working time with rapid set and early strength, have lower modulus of elasticity, twice flexible compared to water based glass ionomers. Chisini et al conducted a systematic review and showed 93.6% success rate of RMGIC, 91.2% for compomer, 79.3% for composite resin in primary teeth restoration.

The Hall Technique (HT) is a method for restoring children's carious primary molars uses a preformed stainless steel crown (SSC) cemented with no caries removal, tooth preparation, or local anaesthesia. Schwendicke F reported that HT showed high cost-effectiveness, dominating conventional restoration mainly because HT is clinically more successful and result in significantly fewer retreatments. The Hall Technique has been shown to be a durable (being likely to last the lifespan of the primary molar) and economical management option for primary molars with carious lesions, which in addition offers the benefit of full coronal coverage, reducing the risk of future carious lesion development.

The patients will be randomly allocated into two groups:

Group 1 - 45 Teeth will be treated using Hall Technique. Group 2 - 45 Teeth will be treated using resin modified glass ionomer cement(Vitremer).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Haryana
      • Rohtak, Haryana, India, 124001
        • Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged between 4 to 8 years.
  • Occlusoproximal caries into dentin affecting one or more than one surface,
  • Crown is restorable.
  • Absence of clinical signs and symptoms
  • More than half root remaining.
  • No complicating medical history
  • Child able to co-operate.
  • Parent and child have consented.
  • Patient ready for radiographs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis, or dental abscess/fistula.
  • Radiographic signs of pulpal involvement, or periradicular pathology.
  • Where there is no cooperation as there is a risk of crown aspiration or swallowing.
  • Patients at risk of infective endocarditis; immunocompromised children.
  • Parents/carers do not give written consent for treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hall Technique
In Hall Technique, SS Crown will be cemented on primary carious molar which satisfy the inclusion criterion without any carious removal, without any tooth preperation, without any local anaesthesia.
SS Crown will be cemented on primary carious molar which satisfy the inclusion criterion without any carious removal, without any tooth preperation, without any local anaesthesia.
Active Comparator: RMGIC restoration
In RMGIC(Vitremer) filling, carious lesion will be completely removed from primary molars using air rotor and local anaesthesia according to need and filled with vitremer rmgic material.
Complete removal of caries and filling will be done with RMGIC material

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical success
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Clinical success will be assessed by absence of clinical signs and symptoms
Baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiographic success
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Absence of periapical alterations (radiolucency at furcal or periapical region).
Baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Saurabh@Pedo#PGIDS

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on Hall technique

3
Subscribe