Outcomes of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders Surgery in Relation to Placenta Accreta Scoring Index

January 29, 2024 updated by: Mohammed Nagy Zaki, Assiut University
Using of Ultra sound in assessment of Placenta Accreta Index to predict the surgical outcomes of Placenta accreta

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Placenta accreta is a substantially life-threatening condition and one of the causes of maternal morbidity and mortality in the world. According to study done in United Kingdom, The estimated incidence of placenta accreta/increta/percreta was 1.7 per 10,000 maternities overall and 577 per 10,000 in women with both a previous caesarean delivery and placenta previa [1]. in a tertiary south Italian center, The incidence increased from 0.12% during the 1970s, to 0.31% during the 2000s [2].While in USA, the prevalence of placenta accreta was 3.7 per 1000 deliveries [3].

This increase is due to many factors. A scar of previous uterine surgery is a major risk factor for placenta accreta. Caesarean section scar is the most common one of uterine scars according to [4] especially in presence of placenta previa where the risk of placenta accreta was 3%, 11%, 40%, 61%, and 67% for the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth or greater repeat cesarean deliveries, respectively. [5] reported that both cesarean delivery morbidity and placenta accreta were positively associated with age >30 years. Previous myomectomy, multi parity, vigorous curettage are other risk factors as said [6]. More ever sub mucous leiomyoma and thermal ablation are also contributing factors to Placenta accreta [7] and lastly [8] said that uterine artery embolization is considered as a risk factor for occurrence of placenta accreta. Contrarily, inter pregnancy interval more than 60 months was associated with decreased risk of placenta accreta [9].

Because placenta accreta can lead to life-threatening blood loss, identification of these high-risk patients would be helpful in management of the pregnancy in addition to enabling the surgeon to be prepared adequately before the time of delivery. Many studies have been done on identification of placenta accreta in the third trimester by 2D ultrasound and color Doppler. There are many modalities for detection of placenta accreta ante natally [10] used 2D ultrasound and color doppler for detection of placenta accreta in 3rd trimester with sensitivity and specificity; 95.24% and 94.74% respectively for ultrasound with the most prominent feature presence of multiple lakes that represented dilated vessels extending from the placenta through the myometrium. For Doppler, the most prominent feature was the presence of interphase hypervascularity with abnormal vessels linking the placenta to the bladder, and the rate was 95.24%.

As for surgery for placenta accreta, planned caesarean hysterectomy is recommended to reduce mortality and morbidity, but fertility is lost. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) can ensure multidisciplinary management at center of excellence which can reduce maternal and fetal complications. This can be established by a scoring system which provides a standardized criterion for the diagnosis and management Placenta Accreta Index (PAI).

Instead of adhering to the conventional approach that involves an elective caesarean hysterectomy based on antenatal imaging, more suitable approaches should be considered from the spectrum of hemostatic and fertility-preserving options available. In our study we will investigate if the degree of adherence is related to the PAI score. Therefore, we can predict cases which will need conservative surgery or peripartum hysterectomy. And so that the surgeon be preplanned to do either hysterectomy or conservative surgery

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

154

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women with Previous Scar of cesarean section who are 32weeks of gestation or more who are known to be Placenta previa

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. pregnant women with gestational age 32 weeks or more
  2. singleton pregnancy
  3. known to have placenta previa (lower edge of the placenta within 5 cm from internal Os )
  4. with at least previous 1 cesarean section

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. the patient is active in labor
  2. haemodynamically unstable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
to decide If placenta accreta index (PAI) can predict suitable type of operation needed whether Conservative management/fertility-sparing techniques or Caesarean hysterectomy
Time Frame: 23 months
23 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of fetal complication associated with placenta accreta
Time Frame: 23 months
23 months
Incidence of maternal complications associated with placenta accreta
Time Frame: 23 months
23 months
The need for ICU admission after placenta accreta surgery and its duration
Time Frame: 23 months
23 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mohammed Nagy, MD, Assiut University
  • Study Director: Mansour Khalifa, MD, Assiut University
  • Principal Investigator: Mostafa Hussien, MD, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Placenta Accreta

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound

3
Subscribe