- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06231355
Liposomal vs. Conventional Bupivacaine for Pain Control
Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Conventional Bupivacaine for Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy: A Pilot Randomized Trial
The goal of this pilot study is to test the hypothesis that liposomal bupivacaine extends the duration of paravertebral block in patients undergoing radical nephrectomy, achieving improved analgesia compared to conventional bupivacaine. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Area under curve of numeric rating scale of pain from 12 to 72 h after surgery.
- Cumulative opioid consumption during the period of 12 to 72 h after surgery.
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Random numbers will be generated by an independent biostatistician in a 1:1 ratio, sealed in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes, and stored by a study coordinator. Only anesthesiologists who perform paravertebral block know group allocation but are not involved in other parts of the trial. Patients, other health-care team members, and investigators for data collection and outcome assessment are masked from group assignments.
Paravertebral block will be performed with either liposomal bupivacaine or plain bupivacaine. The efficacy of nerve block will be assessed every 5 minutes after local anesthetic injection. We will evaluate pain severity, opioid consumption, and occurrence of adverse events at the following timepoints, i.e., end of surgery, 30 minutes after surgery, and 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours after surgery. Additionally, occurrence of complications, quality of recovery, and subjective sleep quality will be assessed during hospital stay after surgery.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Xu Zhenzhen, MD
- Phone Number: +8618811591915
- Email: zjxvzhenzhen@126.com
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100034
- Recruiting
- Peking University first hospital
-
Contact:
- Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: +8613910731903
- Email: wangdongxin@hotmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 70 years old.
- Scheduled for laparoscopic-assisted unilateral radical nephrectomy.
- Agree to undergo regional nerve blockade and receive patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Renal cancer with venous thrombus of grade II or higher, or cases that may convert to open surgery.
- Body mass index ≥30 kg/m² or ≤15 kg/m².
- Severe renal dysfunction (serum creatinine >442 μmol/L or requiring renal replacement therapy), severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh class C), or American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥IV.
- Contraindications for deep nerve block, including severe spinal deformity or history of spinal surgery, severe coagulation abnormalities (international normalized ratio >1.7, activated partial thromboplastin time >4 seconds above normal, platelet count <80×10⁹/L), trauma or infection at the planned puncture site, or severe lumbar back pain.
- Chronic opioid dependence and long-term use of various analgesics for more than 3 months.
- Preoperative inability to communicate due to severe dementia, language barriers, or end-stage diseases.
- Preoperative concomitant central nervous system and/or peripheral nervous system diseases.
- Planned endotracheal intubation and admission to the intensive care unit after surgery.
- Known allergy to local anesthetics.
- Other conditions that are deemed unsuitable for trial participation by the attending surgeons or investigators.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Lipo-bupivacaine
Paravertebral block is performed with liposomal bupivacaine.
|
Paravertebral block is performed using liposomal bupivacaine.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine
Paravertebral block is performed with bupivacaine.
|
Paravertebral block is performed using bupivacaine.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
A composite index of pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) between 12 and 72 hours after surgery
Time Frame: Between 12 and 72 hours afer surgery
|
The composite index of pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) will be calculated using the area under curve (AUC) of pain intensity and cumulative opioid consumption between 12 and 72 hours in the postoperative period.
|
Between 12 and 72 hours afer surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cumulative opioid consumption within 72 hours after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
Cumulative opioid consumption within 72 hours after surgery.
|
Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
Time to onset after paravertebral block
Time Frame: From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
|
Defined as time interval from end of nerve block to appearance of sensory block.
|
From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
|
Time to maximal block after paravertebral block
Time Frame: From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
|
Defined as time interval from end of nerve block to maximal block).
|
From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
|
Extent of paravertebral block
Time Frame: From end of nerve block to 72 hours after surgery.
|
Defined as maximal extent of block.
|
From end of nerve block to 72 hours after surgery.
|
Paravertebral block-related adverse events.
Time Frame: From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
|
Defined as any unpredictable, unfavourable medical event that is associated with paravertebral block.
|
From end of nerve block to initiation of surgery.
|
A composite index of pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) within 72 hours after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
The composite index of pain intensity and opioid consumption (PIOC) will be calculated using the area under curve (AUC) of pain intensity and cumulative opioid consumption between 0.5 and 72 hours in the postoperative period.
|
Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
Pain intensity within 72 hours after surgery
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
The pain intensity will be assessed both at rest and with movement with the numeric rating scale (an 11-point scale where 0 = no pain, and 10 = the most severe pain) at 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hours after surgery.
|
Up to 72 hours after surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Incidence of postoperative complications
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery
|
Complications are defined as new-onset medical events that are deemed harmful and required therapeutic intervention.
|
Up to 30 days after surgery
|
Quality of recovery
Time Frame: At 24 hours after surgery and discharge
|
Quality of recovery will be assessed with the QoR-15 questionnaire; scores range from 0 to 150, with higher score indicating better quality of recovery.
|
At 24 hours after surgery and discharge
|
Duration of postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
|
Duration of postoperative hospital stay
|
Up to 30 days after surgery.
|
Overall in-hospital cost
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after surgery.
|
Overall in-hospital cost
|
Up to 30 days after surgery.
|
Anxiety and depression scores after surgery
Time Frame: At 30 days after surgery.
|
Anxiety and depression scores will be assessed with the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS, scores range from 0 to 21 for either anxiety or depression, with higher score indicating more severe anxiety and depression).
|
At 30 days after surgery.
|
Incidence of pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: At 24 hours after surgery and discharge
|
Pain catastrophizing will be assessed with the pain catastrophizing scale, scale range from 0 to 52, with higher score(>38) indicating pain catastrophizing.
|
At 24 hours after surgery and discharge
|
Patients' satisfaction with pain management.
Time Frame: Up to 3 days after surgery.
|
Patients' satisfaction with pain management will be assessed with the numeric rating scale (an 11-point scale where 0 = the most unsatisfied and 10 = the most satisfied.
|
Up to 3 days after surgery.
|
Postoperative sleep quality
Time Frame: At 1 to 3 days after surgery.
|
Postoperative sleep quality will be assessed with the numeric rating scale, scale range from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating better quality of sleep.
|
At 1 to 3 days after surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dong-Xin Wang, MD, PhD, Peking University first hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
- Chahar P, Cummings KC 3rd. Liposomal bupivacaine: a review of a new bupivacaine formulation. J Pain Res. 2012;5:257-64. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S27894. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
- Mathuram Thiyagarajan U, Bagul A, Nicholson ML. Pain management in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a review. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:201852. doi: 10.1155/2012/201852. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
- Cummings KC 3rd, Napierkowski DE, Parra-Sanchez I, Kurz A, Dalton JE, Brems JJ, Sessler DI. Effect of dexamethasone on the duration of interscalene nerve blocks with ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;107(3):446-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer159. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
- Bergese SD, Ramamoorthy S, Patou G, Bramlett K, Gorfine SR, Candiotti KA. Efficacy profile of liposome bupivacaine, a novel formulation of bupivacaine for postsurgical analgesia. J Pain Res. 2012;5:107-16. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S30861. Epub 2012 May 1.
- Simpson JC, Bao X, Agarwala A. Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Mar;32(2):121-128. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676477. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
- Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.
- Ilfeld BM, Eisenach JC, Gabriel RA. Clinical Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine Administered by Infiltration or Peripheral Nerve Block to Treat Postoperative Pain. Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):283-344. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003630.
- Rice DC, Cata JP, Mena GE, Rodriguez-Restrepo A, Correa AM, Mehran RJ. Posterior Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: An Alternative to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):1953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.074. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
- Hussain N, Brull R, Sheehy B, Essandoh MK, Stahl DL, Weaver TE, Abdallah FW. Perineural Liposomal Bupivacaine Is Not Superior to Nonliposomal Bupivacaine for Peripheral Nerve Block Analgesia. Anesthesiology. 2021 Feb 1;134(2):147-164. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003651.
- Balkhy HH, Arnsdorf S, Krienbring D, Urban J. Liposome Bupivacaine for Postsurgical Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Robotically Assisted Cardiac Surgery. Innovations (Phila). 2015 Nov-Dec;10(6):416-9. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000190.
- Malik O, Kaye AD, Kaye A, Belani K, Urman RD. Emerging roles of liposomal bupivacaine in anesthesia practice. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):151-156. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_375_15.
- Ergun M, Berkers AW, van der Jagt MF, Langenhuijsen JF, van Ozdemir-Brunschot D, van der Vliet JA, D'Ancona FC, Warle MC. Components of pain assessment after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Feb;58(2):219-22. doi: 10.1111/aas.12236. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
- Thavaneswaran P, Rudkin GE, Cooter RD, Moyes DG, Perera CL, Maddern GJ. Brief reports: paravertebral block for anesthesia: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jun 1;110(6):1740-4. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da82c8. Epub 2010 May 6.
- Safa B, Flynn B, McHardy PG, Kiss A, Haslam L, Henry PD, Kaustov L, Choi S. Comparison of the Analgesic Duration of 0.5% Bupivacaine With 1:200,000 Epinephrine Versus 0.5% Ropivacaine Versus 1% Ropivacaine for Low-Volume Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):1129-1137. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005373.
- Pedoto A, Noel J, Park BJ, Amar D. Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Intercostal Nerve Blockade in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 May;35(5):1393-1398. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.11.067. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
- NeMoyer RE, Pantin E, Aisner J, Jongco R, Mellender S, Chiricolo A, Moore DF, Langenfeld J. Paravertebral Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine for Pain Control Following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy. J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.07.093. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
- Dinges HC, Wiesmann T, Otremba B, Wulf H, Eberhart LH, Schubert AK. The analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine compared with bupivacaine hydrochloride for the prevention of postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jun;46(6):490-498. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102427. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
- Kohoutova L, Atlas LY, Buchel C, Buhle JT, Geuter S, Jepma M, Koban L, Krishnan A, Lee DH, Lee S, Roy M, Schafer SM, Schmidt L, Wager TD, Woo CW. Individual variability in brain representations of pain. Nat Neurosci. 2022 Jun;25(6):749-759. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01081-x. Epub 2022 May 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023-553
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Analgesia
-
Mansoura UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Southeast University, ChinaRecruiting
-
Medical University of South CarolinaRecruiting
-
Southeast University, ChinaRecruiting
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRecruiting
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
University of FloridaMdoloris Medical SystemsCompletedAnalgesiaUnited States
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted
-
Cessatech A/SCompleted
-
Kalyra Pharmaceuticals, Inc.United States Department of Defense; PRA Health SciencesTerminated
Clinical Trials on Performing paravertebral nerve block with lipo-bupivacaine
-
Claudia SpiesCompletedCircumcision, Meatotomy or Distal Coronary Correction of HypospadiaGermany
-
University of PittsburghCompletedTotal Hip ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Charles LukeCompletedThoracic Surgical ProceduresUnited States
-
Jianghui XuCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedPain, PostoperativeUnited States
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRecruiting
-
Spectrum Health HospitalsTerminated
-
Assiut UniversityRecruiting
-
University of UtahCompletedDiaphragm ParalysisUnited States
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedRegional Anesthesia SuccessUnited States