Paravertebral Block (PVC) Versus Pectoral Nerve Block (PEC)

June 5, 2023 updated by: Spectrum Health Hospitals

Paravertebral Block Versus Pectoral Nerve Block for Analgesia Following Mastectomy

The purpose of this study is to compare two standard methods of pain control management used at Spectrum Health for patients undergoing breast surgery. The two methods being compared are the paravertebral block (PVB) and the pectoral nerve block (PEC). Postoperative pain control is essential following any major operative procedure. A variety of methods have been used to ensure adequate pain control, each with its own advantages and risks. Increasingly, attention has focused on regional methods of analgesia, which may allow for reduction in systemic narcotic use and their associated complications. Proposed benefits of regional analgesia and a resultant reduction in narcotic use include decreased risk of cancer progression, decreased length of stay, and decreased risk of ileus.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical profiles of two currently acceptable analgesia techniques. The most common regional block used to achieve postoperative analgesia following mastectomy is the paravertebral block, during which local anesthetic is injected into the paravertebral space which contains the thoracic spinal nerves, between the costotransverse ligament and the pleura. At our institution there has been recent interest in an alternative regional block. The pectoral nerve block is performed by injecting anesthetic between the pectoralis major and the pectoralis minor (PECs I) or between the pectoralis minor and the serratus anterior (PEC II).

The proposed advantage of the pectoral nerve block for regional anesthesia during breast surgery is equal analgesic efficacy with fewer potential complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

89

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503
        • Esther L Peariso

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients ≥ 18 years of age
  • Total mastectomy or partial mastectomy with or without reconstruction OR planned lumpectomy.
  • Patient determined by their surgeon as medically able to receive a regional block for post-operative analgesia
  • Patient agrees to participate in the study and signs informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neoadjuvant radiation therapy
  • Stage IV cancer
  • Previous breast surgery (excluding percutaneous biopsies of all types)
  • History of either PVB or PEC procedures
  • Planned general anesthesia use during surgery
  • Allergies to ropivacaine, midazolam, fentanyl, or propofol
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoners
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Non-English-speaking patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Paravertebral Block
The Paravertebral Block is performed along the spine utilizing ultrasound guided technique (20-30 mL 0.5% Ropivacaine)
20-30 mL 0.5% Ropivacaine
Other Names:
  • PVB
Active Comparator: Pectoral Nerve Block
The Pectoral Nerve Block is performed anteriorly, at the level of the axillary line, also utilizing ultrasound guided technique (20-30 mL 0.5% Ropivacaine)
20-30 mL 0.5% Ropivacaine
Other Names:
  • PEC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative Narcotic Use
Time Frame: intraoperatively, average of about 1 hour
Participants for whom Narcotics were used for pain during surgery
intraoperatively, average of about 1 hour
Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Narcotic Use
Time Frame: in PACU, generally 1-3 hours
Participants for whom Narcotics were used in PACU
in PACU, generally 1-3 hours
Postoperative Narcotic Use
Time Frame: First 24 hours post-PACU (or until discharge)
Participants for whom Narcotics were used postoperatively
First 24 hours post-PACU (or until discharge)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Control Measured by Length of Operation
Time Frame: intraoperative
Measuring pain control by how long (in minutes) patient is in surgery
intraoperative
Pain Control Measured by Estimated Blood Loss
Time Frame: intraoperative
Measuring blood loss (in ml) during surgery
intraoperative
Participants With Postoperative Nausea
Time Frame: 2 weeks postoperative
count of participants who reported nausea after surgery
2 weeks postoperative
Pain Control Measured by Pain Scale
Time Frame: 2 weeks postoperative
Pain measured on scale of one to ten, one being least amount of pain and ten the greatest.
2 weeks postoperative
Pain Control Measured by the Use of Pain Pills Postoperatively
Time Frame: 2 weeks postoperative
Participants who used narcotic pain pills postoperatively
2 weeks postoperative
Pain Control Measured by Calls to Physicians Office Relating to Pain
Time Frame: 2 weeks postoperative
Number of phone calls made to physician office regarding pain
2 weeks postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marianne Melink, MD, Spectrum Health Hospitals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-306

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Paravertebral Block

3
Subscribe