Arthroscopic Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction

January 23, 2024 updated by: Goorens Chul Ki, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Tienen

Arthroscopic Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction, Volar and Dorsal Reconstruction, as Treatment for Dysfunction of the Scapholunate Joint With Insufficiency of the Scapholunate Ligament and Secondary Stabilizers

Arthroscopical reconstruction of the volar and dorsal part of the scapholunate ligament as treatment for complete scapholunate ligament injury, but reducible carpal malalignment.

This prospective study aims to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome of this technique on the short and middle term

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Classical arthroscopic techniques for scapholunate instability consist of debridement, thermal shrinkage, and percutaneous pinning. Good results are obtained in acute lesions or in chronic partial tears, but they are less predictable when the lesion is complete, because of the poor healing capacity of the scapholunate ligament and because it is not possible to perform an anatomic ligamentous reconstruction with these techniques. Open techniques are thus required for reconstruction, but they damage the soft tissues. Corella et al. published a description and cadaver study of an arthroscopic ligamentoplasty, trying to combine the advantages of arthroscopic techniques (minimally invasive surgery) and open techniques (reconstruction of the ligament). With this approach, it is possible to reconstruct the dorsal scapholunate ligament and the secondary stabilizers while causing minimal damage to the soft tissues and avoiding injury to the posterior interosseous nerve and detachment of the dorsal intercarpal ligament. Arthroscopic scapholunate volar and dorsal ligament reconstruction achieves an anatomic reconstruction to provide a strong construct for early mobilization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tienen, Belgium, 3300
        • Department of orthopaedics RZ Tienen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scapholunate dysfunction, complete irrepairable lesion of the SL ligament and the secondary stabilizers (RSC-LRL-SRL) EWAS stage 4-5, no arthritis, with reducible malalignment
  • 18 - 65 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - associated lesions, fractures
  • neurological disorder affecting the upper limb, history of wrist lesion involving the same wrist, dementia, substance abuse, severe psychiatric disorder and previous injured contralateral wrist

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arthroscopic Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction
Experimental: patients with dynamic scapholunate instability wrist arthroscopy: bone-tendon reconstruction of the volar and dorsal part of the scapholunate complex
reconstruction of the SL ligament with palmaris tendon graft tunneled through the scaphoid and lunate as described by Corella et al.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
passive and active range of motion (degrees) operated and contralateral side
Time Frame: preop
flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation
preop
passive and active range of motion (degrees) operated and contralateral side
Time Frame: postoperative 3 months
flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation
postoperative 3 months
passive and active range of motion (degrees) operated and contralateral side
Time Frame: postoperative 6 months
flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation
postoperative 6 months
passive and active range of motion (degrees) operated and contralateral side
Time Frame: postoperative 12 months
flexion, extension, ulnar and radial deviation
postoperative 12 months
grip strength (kg) operated and contralateral side
Time Frame: preop
dynamometer (kg)
preop
grip strength (kg) operated and contralateral side
Time Frame: postoperative 3 months
dynamometer (kg)
postoperative 3 months
grip strength (kg) operated and contralateral side
Time Frame: postoperative 6 months
dynamometer (kg)
postoperative 6 months
grip strength (kg) operated and contralateral side
Time Frame: postoperative 12 months
dynamometer (kg)
postoperative 12 months
pain (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: preop
Visual analogue Scale (0 no pain -10 cm worst pain)
preop
pain (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: postoperative 3 months
Visual analogue Scale Scale (0 no pain -10 cm worst pain)
postoperative 3 months
pain (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: postoperative 6 months
Visual analogue Scale Scale (0 no pain -10 cm worst pain)
postoperative 6 months
pain (visual analogue scale)
Time Frame: postoperative 12 months
Visual analogue Scale (0 no pain -10 cm worst pain)
postoperative 12 months
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score
Time Frame: preop
function score (0 is best -100 is worst)
preop
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score
Time Frame: postoperative 3 months
function score (0 is best -100 is worst)
postoperative 3 months
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score
Time Frame: postoperative 6 months
function score (0 is best -100 is worst)
postoperative 6 months
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score
Time Frame: postoperative 12 months
function score (0 is best -100 is worst)
postoperative 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction after treatment
Time Frame: postoperative 12 months
visual analogue scale (0 is worst -10 cm is best)
postoperative 12 months
complications
Time Frame: postoperative 12 months
descriptive
postoperative 12 months
arthroscopical assessment of the scapholunate stability
Time Frame: intraoperative
according to European Wrist Arthroscopy Society classification (EWAS1 best -5 worst)
intraoperative
scapholunate distance, carpal angles
Time Frame: preop
radiological follow-up (distance in mm or angles in degrees)
preop
scapholunate distance, carpal angles
Time Frame: postoperative 12 months
radiological follow-up (distance in mm or angles in degrees)
postoperative 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kjell Van Royen, MD, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RZ Tienen EC 109

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scapholunate Dissociation

Clinical Trials on Arthroscopic Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction

3
Subscribe