A Smart Digital Workflow Towards High Precision and Through-Put Production for Removable Partial Dentures

February 15, 2024 updated by: National Dental Centre, Singapore
Tooth loss is a major chronic problem in dentistry and edentulous elderly endures poorer quality of life worldwide. Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are the most widely accepted and cost-effective treatment for patients to restore oral functions. RPDs contain three components including the metal framework, denture base and acrylic teeth. Conventionally, RPD fabrication involves tedious clinical and dental laboratory procedures and is time consuming, labour-intensive, and often imprecise, therefore incapable of meeting the growing demands of RPD by an ageing population. The challenges to achieve a high quality and high-throughput RPD service lie in three aspects: 1) accuracy in capturing oral profile; 2) immediate oral information analysis and device design, and 3) automation in production.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Tooth loss is a major chronic problem in dentistry and edentulous elderly endures poorer quality of life worldwide. Removable partial dentures (RPDs) are the most widely accepted and cost-effective treatment for patients to restore oral functions. RPDs contain three components including the metal framework, denture base and acrylic teeth. Conventionally, RPD fabrication involves tedious clinical and dental laboratory procedures and is time consuming, labour-intensive, and often imprecise, therefore incapable of meeting the growing demands of RPD by an ageing population. The challenges to achieve a high quality and high-throughput RPD service lie in three aspects: 1) accuracy in capturing oral profile; 2) immediate oral information analysis and device design, and 3) automation in production.

Towards this goal, we have developed an intelligent RPD design software prototype, SmartRPD, to generate RPD metal framework design using digital scans from patients. SmartRPD processes patient-specific scanned geometry instantly, provide diagnosis analysis and generate the first draft of metal framework design automatically, powered by a teeth geometry segmentation system, knowledge-based design algorithm and 3D geometry engines. Dentists make the final clinical changes and confirmation before sending the 3D digital files for 3D printing. Thereafter, an altered digital scan technique is used to register a precise digital scan of soft tissues under functioning, using the metal framework as a loading impression tray and digitally align to the initial oral scan. This resulted modified master scan file leads to a more accurate setting for the denture base in the subsequent procedures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

141

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 168938
        • Recruiting
        • National Dental Centre Singapore
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zi Ying Phang
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Khim Hean Teoh
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Janice Tan Zhi Hui

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • above the age of 21 years' old
  • medically fit
  • with prior denture experience
  • either maxillary or mandible partial dentate
  • partial edentulism with stable occlusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of maladaptation to denture use
  • With maxillofacial or mandible bone defect(s)
  • Known allergic reaction to cobalt chromium metal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Group 1

Conventional:

The Standard of Care (SOC) workflow, which will act as a baseline compared to the other 2 groups.

Teeth Profile Capture Method: Physical impression RPD Design Method: Based on stone model, using wax pattern RPD Fabrication Method: Lost wax casting

Experimental: Group 2

Partial Digital:

Similar to the SOC, Group 2 adopts the same teeth profile capture method, where a physical impression of teeth profile is taken from the subject. However, instead of using physical wax pattern on the stone model for design, the stone model is scanned and, on the scan, the design is performed digitally. For fabrication of RPD in Group 2, instead of using lost wax casting as per the SOC, the digital design is used for additive manufacturing.

Teeth Profile Capture Method: Physical impression RPD Design Method: Based on stone model, using design software RPD Fabrication Method: Additive manufacturing
Experimental: Group 3

SmartRPD Digital:

Group 3 adopts a different teeth profile capture method by using the intraoral scanner to digitally scan and save the subject's teeth profile. From the intraoral scan, a digital model of the subject's teeth profile is created. Similar to Group 2, but on the digital model instead, the design of RPD is digitally performed. The digital design, as per Group 2, is used for additive manufacturing.

Teeth Profile Capture Method: Intraoral scan RPD Design Method: Based on intraoral scan, using design software RPD Fabrication Method: Additive manufacturing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of Precision in Fabricated Metal Frameworks Across Three Workflows
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of the study period, up to 14 months

The precision of fabricated RPD metal frameworks will be assessed by measuring the gaps between occlusal rests and corresponding rest seats of abutment teeth during the clinical try-in stage. Clinical parameters including support, retention, and stability will be evaluated by calibrated clinical evaluators to compare framework quality among three patient groups.

Measurement: Gap measurements between occlusal rest and corresponding rest seat

Assessed at the end of the study period, up to 14 months
Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with RPD Prostheses Fabricated Using Three Workflows
Time Frame: From date of randomization during first visit till 3rd follow up visit, assessed up to 14 months

Patient satisfaction with final RPD prostheses will be compared among three workflows. Assessment of patient satisfaction with various oral functions will be conducted using validated denture and oral health impact (OHIP) questionnaires.

Measurement: Patient-reported satisfaction scores on denture and oral health impact questionnaires.

From date of randomization during first visit till 3rd follow up visit, assessed up to 14 months
Comparison of Fabrication Cost and Time Across Three Workflows
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of the study period, up to 14 months

he study aims to compare fabrication cost and time spent on three workflows. Direct and indirect costs, clinical chair time, and laboratory work time will be measured based on an operational model in a dental clinic. Additionally, exploratory analysis will be conducted to assess changes in quality-adjusted life years attributable to different dental workflows.

Measurement: Direct and indirect costs, clinical chair time, laboratory work time, and potential changes in quality-adjusted life years.

Assessed at the end of the study period, up to 14 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 385/2023

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Partial-edentulism

Clinical Trials on Group 2 - 3D Printed Removable Partial Denture

3
Subscribe