Validation of the Lithuanian Version of the BNSS, CDSS, and the SCoRS

February 19, 2024 updated by: Virginija Adomaitienė, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Validation of the Lithuanian Version of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale

This study aims to validate the Lithuanian version of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale in a Lithuanian sample. This will be done by comparing results obtained from the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale with results obtained from the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale, the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This scale validation study aims to validate the Lithuanian version of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale in the Lithuanian sample. The main aim of this study is:

• to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of Lithuanian versions of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale.

Participants will be evaluated using the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS), Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test, Brief Negative Symptoms Scale, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale.

To discern the discriminant validity of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale for negative symptoms, results from the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale will be compared to results from the positive and general subscale of the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale and the Montgomery Asperger Depression Rating Scale. To discern the convergent validity of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale for negative symptoms, results from the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale will be compared to the results from the negative subscale of the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale and the Self-evaluation of Negative Symptoms scale.

To discern the discriminant validity of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia for depressive symptoms of schizophrenia, results obtained from the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia will be compared to results obtained from the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale and the Self-evaluation of Negative Symptoms scale. To check the convergent validity of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, results obtained from the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia will be compared to results obtained from the Montgomery Asperger Depression Rating Scale.

Finally, to check the discriminant validity of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale, results obtained from the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale will be compared to results obtained from the Montgomery Asperger Depression Rating Scale and the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale. In contrast, to prevent convergent validity, results obtained from the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale will be compared to results obtained from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Inpatients between 18 and 65 years old with a diagnosis of F20, F25, or F21, according to ICD-10, who sign the informed consent form and do not have any exclusion criteria, will be included in the study. We will not devide patients who have active psychotic symptoms and those who do not.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18 - 65 years old;
  • Diagnosis of F20, F25 or F21 according to ICD-10;
  • Signed informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age younger than 18 or older than 65 years old;
  • Did not sign the informed consent form;
  • Legally inactive person
  • Patients with a comorbid or primary diagnosis of mental retardation according to ICD-10 (F70 - F79);
  • Patients with a comorbid or primary diagnosis of mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use (F10 - F19)
  • Patients with a comorbid of primary diagnosis of organic, including symptomatic, mental disorders (F00 - F09)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validated Lithuanian version of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale.
Time Frame: Day 1
Patients will be evaluated using the Lithuanian version of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale (score 0 - 78; a greater score means more pronounced negative symptoms) once during the inpatient treatment. The results will be compared with the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale score (0 - 210; a greater score means more pronounced symptoms of schizophrenia), Montgomery Asperger Depression Scale (Score 0 - 60; a greater score means greater symptoms of depression), Self-evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale (score 0 - 40; greater score means more pronounced negative symptoms), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (score 0 - 31; a greater score means better cognitive functions). Convergent and divergent validities will be calculated for each validated instrument by calculating correlations.
Day 1
Validated Lithuanian version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia.
Time Frame: Day 1
Patients will be evaluated using the Lithuanian version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (score 0 - 27; a greater score means greater depression) once during the inpatient treatment, and the results will be compared with results from the Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (score 0 - 210, greater score means more pronounced symptoms of schizophrenia), Montgomery Asperger Depression Scale (Score 0 - 60; greater score means greater symptoms of depression), and Self-evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale (score 0 - 40; greater score means more pronounced negative symptoms). Convergent and divergent validities will be calculated for each validated instrument by calculating correlations.
Day 1
Validated Lithuanian version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale.
Time Frame: Day 1
Patients will be evaluated using the Lithuanian version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (score 0 - 80; a greater score means worse cognitive functions; global functioning score 1 - 10 with a greater score meaning worse functioning) once during the inpatient treatment, and the results will be compared with results from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (score 0 - 31; a greater score means better cognitive functions). Convergent and divergent validities will be calculated for each validated instrument by calculating correlations.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between negative symptoms and cognitive deficits of schizophrenia
Time Frame: Day 1
Correlation between negative symptoms evaluated with second-generation negative symptoms assessment tools (Brief Negative Symptoms Scale (score 0 - 78; a greater score means more pronounced negative symptoms) and Self-evaluation of Negative Symptoms scale (score 0 - 40; greater score means more pronounced negative symptoms) and Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (score 0 - 80; a greater score means worse cognitive functions; global functioning score 1 - 10 with a greater score meaning worse functioning). Correlations between specific subscales of the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale, the Self-evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale, and the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale will be calculated. We will check for differences in correlation between different ages, education, duration of disease groups, and sexes.
Day 1
Correlation between depressive symptoms and cognitive deficits of schizophrenia
Time Frame: Day 1
Correlation between depressive symptoms evaluated with the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (score 0 - 27; a greater score means greater depression) and Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (score 0 - 80; a greater score means worse cognitive functions; global functioning score 1 - 10 with a greater score meaning worse functioning). Correlations between specific items of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale will be calculated. We will check for differences in correlation between different ages, education, duration of disease groups, and sexes.
Day 1
Correlation between negative symptoms, cognitive deficits, depressive symptoms of schizophrenia and health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Day 1
Correlation between results obtained from the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale score 0 - 78; a greater score means more pronounced negative symptoms), Self-evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale (score 0 - 40; a greater score means more pronounced negative symptoms), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (score 0 - 27; a greater score means greater depression), and the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (score 0 - 80; a greater score means worse cognitive functions; global functioning score 1 - 10 with a greater score meaning worse functioning) with results about the health-related quality of life of patients with schizophrenia evaluated with the 36-Item Short Form Survey (8 subscores scored from 0 percent to 100 percent, with more percents meaning better health-related quality of life) will be calculated. We will check for differences in correlation between different ages, education, duration of disease groups, and sexes.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Virginija Adomaitienė, Prof., Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 11, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 11, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Brief Negative Symptoms Scale

3
Subscribe