A Comparison of Diagnostic Testing Modalities in the Assessment of Asthma (MODELS)

April 2, 2024 updated by: Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
This study aims to assess the concordance of international asthma guidelines in the diagnosis of asthma and explore the presence of airways disease using additional non-guideline physiologic criteria, such as IOS (impulse osciollometry), not included in the guidelines, but available in the Portsmouth lung function service.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Asthma is a widespread condition that affects millions of people worldwide. It is characterized by symptoms such as difficulty breathing, coughing, and wheezing. Diagnosing asthma involves identifying certain indicators like airflow obstruction, airway sensitivity, and inflammation. However, different international guidelines, including those from organizations such as NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence), GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma), and BTS (British Thoracic Society)/SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network), have varying criteria for diagnosis. This can lead to inconsistencies in identifying patients with asthma.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different diagnostic approaches, including impulse oscillometry (IOS), in diagnosing asthma. IOS is a simple and non-invasive test that measures lung function. It has the potential to enhance the accuracy and ease of asthma diagnosis. Despite its promise, current research on the role of IOS in diagnosing asthma in adults is limited.

To address these gaps in knowledge, the study will examine the data of patients attending the severe asthma service at Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth. With an "opt-out" consent process, routine outpatient lung function data will be analysed, paying special attention to the usefulness of IOS compared to other lung function indices in diagnosing asthma.

By conducting this study, the aim is to contribute valuable insights to the field of asthma diagnosis. The study findings may help refine the methodology of diagnosing asthma and potentially expand the diagnostic toolkit to include IOS. This could improve the precision and ease of managing asthma, leading to better outcomes for patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

750

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of patients referred for specialist review from primary care and needing specialist review after emergency admission. This research will utilise historical and contemporary data from pulmonary function tests performed during the asthma workup at the Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth. The tests will include Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO), Skin prick tests, Impulse Oscillometry, Spirometry, Gas transfer, lung volumes and Bronchodilator reversibility.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient will meet all the following criteria to be considered eligible for the study:

    • Aged 18 years or over.
    • All patients who have attended full asthma workups from November 2021 till date
    • Willing and able to consent to use their data in this study (opt-out form or e-consent).
    • Patients referred to the Portsmouth asthma service for diagnosis and further management of presumed asthma. Comorbidities are common in asthma, thus patients with co-existing conditions such as obesity, bronchiectasis or COPD will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The participant may not enter the study if either of the following apply:

    • Unable to comprehend the study and provide informed consent, e.g., insufficient command of English in the absence of someone who can adequately interpret.
    • Patients with other primary respiratory conditions, such as ILD.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International asthma guidelines scores
Time Frame: during study analysis 4 weeks after recruitment
To assess the levels of concordance among international asthma guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in patients referred to a secondary/tertiary care asthma service.
during study analysis 4 weeks after recruitment
non-guideline physiologic criteria
Time Frame: during study analysis 4 weeks after recruitment
Assess the presence or absence of airway disease by the non-guideline physiologic criteria with those fulfilling (or not) the diagnostic criteria for asthma according to any of the selected guidelines.
during study analysis 4 weeks after recruitment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
non-guideline physiologic criteria for asthma.
Time Frame: during study analysis 4 weeks after recruitment
Compare the clinical characteristics of patients stratified by the presence or absence of guideline and non-guideline physiologic criteria for asthma.
during study analysis 4 weeks after recruitment
Comparison of the diagnostic outcomes of each guideline with a "reference standard".
Time Frame: during study analysis 4 weeks after recruitment
Assess the sensitivity of each guideline in the diagnosis of airway disease by comparing the diagnostic outcomes of each guideline with a "reference standard".
during study analysis 4 weeks after recruitment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anoop Chauhan, Portsmouth University Hospital Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 24, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No data will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Lung function tests

3
Subscribe